117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25231568)
1. Fragrance patch tests prepared in advance may give false-negative reactions.
Mowitz M; Svedman C; Zimerson E; Bruze M
Contact Dermatitis; 2014 Nov; 71(5):289-94. PubMed ID: 25231568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Stability of fragrance patch test preparations applied in test chambers.
Mowitz M; Zimerson E; Svedman C; Bruze M
Br J Dermatol; 2012 Oct; 167(4):822-7. PubMed ID: 22803625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Patch testing with a new fragrance mix - reactivity to the individual constituents and chemical detection in relevant cosmetic products.
Frosch PJ; Rastogi SC; Pirker C; Brinkmeier T; Andersen KE; Bruze M; Svedman C; Goossens A; White IR; Uter W; Arnau EG; Lepoittevin JP; Johansen JD; Menne T
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Apr; 52(4):216-25. PubMed ID: 15859994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Patch testing with a new fragrance mix detects additional patients sensitive to perfumes and missed by the current fragrance mix.
Frosch PJ; Pirker C; Rastogi SC; Andersen KE; Bruze M; Svedman C; Goossens A; White IR; Uter W; Arnau EG; Lepoittevin JP; Menné T; Johansen JD
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Apr; 52(4):207-15. PubMed ID: 15859993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relevance of positive patch-test reactions to fragrance mix.
Devos SA; Constandt L; Tupker RA; Noz KC; Lucker GP; Bruynzeel DP; Schuttelaar ML; Kruyswijk MR; van Zuuren EJ; Vink J; Coenraads PJ; Kiemeney LA; van der Valk PG
Dermatitis; 2008; 19(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 18346396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Results of patch testing with fragrance mix 1, fragrance mix 2, and their ingredients, and Myroxylon pereirae and colophonium, over a 21-year period.
Nardelli A; Carbonez A; Drieghe J; Goossens A
Contact Dermatitis; 2013 May; 68(5):307-13. PubMed ID: 23601065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Simultaneous patch testing with fragrance mix I, fragrance mix II and their ingredients in southern Sweden between 2009 and 2015.
Mowitz M; Svedman C; Zimerson E; Isaksson M; Pontén A; Bruze M
Contact Dermatitis; 2017 Nov; 77(5):280-287. PubMed ID: 28685882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A study of new fragrance mixtures.
Larsen W; Nakayama H; Fischer T; Elsner P; Frosch P; Burrows D; Jordan W; Shaw S; Wilkinson J; Marks J; Sugawara M; Nethercott M; Nethercottdagger J
Am J Contact Dermat; 1998 Dec; 9(4):202-6. PubMed ID: 9810019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fragrance mix I patch test reactions in 5006 consecutive dermatitis patients tested simultaneously with TRUE Test® and Trolab® test material.
Mortz CG; Andersen KE
Contact Dermatitis; 2010 Nov; 63(5):248-53. PubMed ID: 20946453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Patch test concentrations (doses in mg/cm2 ) for the 12 non-mix fragrance substances regulated by European legislation.
Bruze M; Svedman C; Andersen KE; Bruynzeel D; Goossens A; Johansen JD; Matura M; Orton D; Vigan M;
Contact Dermatitis; 2012 Mar; 66(3):131-6. PubMed ID: 22320667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Recommendation to include fragrance mix 2 and hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde (Lyral) in the European baseline patch test series.
Bruze M; Andersen KE; Goossens A; ;
Contact Dermatitis; 2008 Mar; 58(3):129-33. PubMed ID: 18279149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Baseline series fragrance markers fail to predict contact allergy.
Mann J; McFadden JP; White JM; White IR; Banerjee P
Contact Dermatitis; 2014 May; 70(5):276-81. PubMed ID: 24731084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical relevance of positive patch test reactions to the 26 EU-labelled fragrances.
van Oosten EJ; Schuttelaar ML; Coenraads PJ
Contact Dermatitis; 2009 Oct; 61(4):217-23. PubMed ID: 19825093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Patch tests with fragrance mix II and its components.
Pónyai G; Németh I; Altmayer A; Nagy G; Irinyi B; Battyáni Z; Temesvári E;
Dermatitis; 2012; 23(2):71-4. PubMed ID: 22653122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reactivity to patch tests with nickel sulfate and fragrance mix in infants.
Jøhnke H; Norberg LA; Vach W; Bindslev-Jensen C; Høst A; Andersen KE
Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Sep; 51(3):141-7. PubMed ID: 15479203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Patch testing with hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde (HICC) - a multicentre study of the Swedish Contact Dermatitis Research Group.
Engfeldt M; Hagvall L; Isaksson M; Matura M; Mowitz M; Ryberg K; Stenberg B; Svedman C; Bruze M
Contact Dermatitis; 2017 Jan; 76(1):34-39. PubMed ID: 27767215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The significance of batch and patch test method in establishing contact allergy to fragrance mix I-EDEN Fragrance Study Group.
Bruze M; Mowitz M; Ofenloch R; Coenraads PJ; Diepgen TL; Elsner P; Gonçalo M; Naldi L; Svensson Å
Contact Dermatitis; 2019 Aug; 81(2):104-109. PubMed ID: 30810228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Association between positive patch tests to epoxy resin and fragrance mix I ingredients.
Andersen KE; Christensen LP; Vølund A; Johansen JD; Paulsen E
Contact Dermatitis; 2009 Mar; 60(3):155-7. PubMed ID: 19260913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A clinical and patch test study of patients with positive patch test reactions to fragrance mix in China.
Lu X; Li LF; Wang W; Wang J
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Apr; 52(4):188-91. PubMed ID: 15859990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reactivity to sorbitan sesquioleate affects reactivity to fragrance mix I.
Geier J; Schnuch A; Lessmann H; Uter W
Contact Dermatitis; 2015 Nov; 73(5):296-304. PubMed ID: 26329727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
