These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25231698)

  • 1. [Development and use of an APHAB database].
    Löhler J; Akcicek B; Kappe T; Schlattmann P; Wollenberg B; Schönweiler R
    HNO; 2014 Oct; 62(10):735-45. PubMed ID: 25231698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Implementation of the new quality assurance agreement for the fitting of hearing aids in daily practice. Part 2: New diagnostic aspects of speech audiometry].
    Löhler J; Akcicek B; Wollenberg B; Schönweiler R
    HNO; 2014 Sep; 62(9):667-81; quiz 682. PubMed ID: 25185973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of frequency-dependent hearing loss to unaided APHAB scores.
    Löhler J; Akcicek B; Wollenberg B; Kappe T; Schlattmann P; Schönweiler R
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Nov; 273(11):3587-3593. PubMed ID: 26975446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Results of clinical use of the German version of the APHAB].
    Löhler J; Moser L; Heinrich D; Hörmann K; Walther LE
    HNO; 2012 Jul; 60(7):626-36. PubMed ID: 22763767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sensitivity and specificity of the abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit (APHAB).
    Löhler J; Gräbner F; Wollenberg B; Schlattmann P; Schönweiler R
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Oct; 274(10):3593-3598. PubMed ID: 28756570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of Hearing Aid Benefit Using Patient-Reported Outcomes and Audiologic Measures.
    Dornhoffer JR; Meyer TA; Dubno JR; McRackan TR
    Audiol Neurootol; 2020; 25(4):215-223. PubMed ID: 32241007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Extended wear hearing aids: a comparative, pilot study.
    Gazia F; Portelli D; Lo Vano M; Ciodaro F; Galletti B; Bruno R; Freni F; Alberti G; Galletti F
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2022 Nov; 279(11):5415-5422. PubMed ID: 35767065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Management of quality in rehabilitation with hearing aids].
    Hauser R; Kollmeier B; Steffens T; Weihmann HP; Westhofen M; Probst R
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2004 Nov; 83(11):777-9. PubMed ID: 15538676
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of a BICROS System with a Directional Microphone in the Receiver and Transmitter.
    Valente M; Oeding K
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015; 26(10):856-71. PubMed ID: 26554490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The Influence of Hearing Loss Represented by Standard Audiogram Types to Unaided APHAB Scores].
    Löhler J; Akcicek B; Kappe T; Wollenberg B; Schlattmann P; Schönweiler R
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2016 Aug; 95(8):540-5. PubMed ID: 27064271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Correlation between the APHAB questionnaire and the Freiburg monosyllabic test without + with noise].
    Löhler J; Sippel M; Walther LE; Schönweiler R
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2022 Apr; 101(4):304-309. PubMed ID: 34157776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The benefit method: fitting hearing aids in noise.
    Svard I; Spens KE; Back L; Ahlner BH; Barrenas ML
    Noise Health; 2005; 7(29):12-23. PubMed ID: 17478965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Directivity and noise reduction in hearing aids: speech perception and benefit.
    Quintino CA; Mondelli MF; Ferrari DV
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2010; 76(5):630-8. PubMed ID: 20963348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Audiological and subjective benefit results in bone-anchored hearing device users.
    Boleas-Aguirre MS; Bulnes Plano MD; de Erenchun Lasa IR; Ibáñez Beroiz B
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jun; 33(4):494-503. PubMed ID: 22472615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Speech understanding in noise with an eyeglass hearing aid: asymmetric fitting and the head shadow benefit of anterior microphones.
    Mens LH
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 21047292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bone-anchored hearing aids in unilateral inner ear deafness.
    Bosman AJ; Hol MK; Snik AF; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2003 Jan; 123(2):258-60. PubMed ID: 12701753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Check of hearing aid fitting].
    Schorn K
    HNO; 2004 Oct; 52(10):875-85. PubMed ID: 15316629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Audiometric correlates of the unaided APHAB.
    Cox RM; Alexander GC; Gray GA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2003 Sep; 14(7):361-71. PubMed ID: 14620610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Influence of hearing aids on monosyllabic test score and subjective everyday hearing].
    Thümmler R; Liebscher T; Hoppe U
    HNO; 2016 Aug; 64(8):595-600. PubMed ID: 27126291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Associations between the probabilities of frequency-specific hearing loss and unaided APHAB scores.
    Löhler J; Wollenberg B; Schlattmann P; Hoang N; Schönweiler R
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Mar; 274(3):1345-1349. PubMed ID: 27858146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.