These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2523216)

  • 1. Clinical evaluation of the bond between composite resin and etched glass ionomer cement.
    Tyas MJ; Toohey A; Clark J
    Aust Dent J; 1989 Feb; 34(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 2523216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical evaluation of direct esthetic restorations in cervical abrasion/erosion lesions: one-year results.
    Powell LV; Gordon GE; Johnson GH
    Quintessence Int; 1991 Sep; 22(9):687-92. PubMed ID: 1835107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Microleakage of glass ionomer/composite resin restorations: a laboratory study. 1. The influence of glass ionomer cement.
    Smith ED; Martin FE
    Aust Dent J; 1992 Feb; 37(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 1533112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
    Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H
    J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical performance of dentine bonding agents in the enamel-etched Class V abrasion lesion.
    Tyas MJ
    Aust Dent J; 1990 Oct; 35(5):459-62. PubMed ID: 2073194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Factors associated with clinical success of cervical abrasion/erosion restorations.
    Powell LV; Johnson GH; Gordon GE
    Oper Dent; 1995; 20(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 8700767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sensitivity restored of Class V abrasion/erosion lesions.
    Powell LV; Gordon GE; Johnson GH
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1990 Dec; 121(6):694-6. PubMed ID: 2148943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical comparison of Class V resin composite and glass ionomer restorations.
    Powell LV; Gordon GE; Johnson GH
    Am J Dent; 1992 Oct; 5(5):249-52. PubMed ID: 1299249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Two-year clinical performance of Class V resin-modified glass-lonomer and resin composite restorations.
    Brackett WW; Dib A; Brackett MG; Reyes AA; Estrada BE
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):477-81. PubMed ID: 14531590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical performance of two dentine adhesives: 2-year results.
    Tyas MJ
    Aust Dent J; 1996 Oct; 41(5):324-7. PubMed ID: 8961606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical evaluation of Scotchbond: three-year results.
    Tyas MJ; Burns GA; Byrne PF; Cunningham PJ; Dobson BC; Widdop FT
    Aust Dent J; 1989 Jun; 34(3):277-9. PubMed ID: 2527492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical evaluation of three dentine bonding agents.
    Tyas MJ
    Aust Dent J; 1989 Dec; 34(6):559-62. PubMed ID: 2533489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The glass-ionomer-lined cervical composite restoration: an in vitro investigation.
    Brown KB; Swartz ML; Cochran MA; Phillips RW
    Oper Dent; 1993; 18(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 8332536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A clinical evaluation of the restoration of root surface caries.
    Levy SM; Jensen ME
    Spec Care Dentist; 1990; 10(5):156-60. PubMed ID: 11100226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of etching time on surface morphology and adhesion of a posterior resin to glass-ionomer cement.
    Joynt RB; Williams D; Davis EL; Wieczkowski G
    J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Mar; 61(3):310-4. PubMed ID: 2646444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of cavity pretreatment procedures on dentin bonding: a four-year clinical evaluation.
    van Dijken JW
    J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Aug; 64(2):148-52. PubMed ID: 2202813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Acid etching of a glass ionomer cement base: SEM study.
    Smith ED; Martin FE
    Aust Dent J; 1990 Jun; 35(3):236-40. PubMed ID: 2203329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of etching glass-ionomer cements on bond strength to composite resin.
    Sheth JJ; Jensen ME; Sheth PJ; Versteeg J
    J Dent Res; 1989 Jun; 68(6):1082-7. PubMed ID: 2681306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Posterior resin composite restorations with or without resin-modified, glass-ionomer cement lining: a 1-year randomized, clinical trial.
    Banomyong D; Harnirattisai C; Burrow MF
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 Feb; 2(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 25427330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Laboratory evaluation of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding.
    Millett DT; Cattanach D; McFadzean R; Pattison J; McColl J
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):58-63; discussion 64. PubMed ID: 10022186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.