These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25232670)

  • 21. The role of reading time complexity and reading speed in text comprehension.
    Wallot S; O'Brien BA; Haussmann A; Kloos H; Lyby MS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Nov; 40(6):1745-65. PubMed ID: 24999710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Baselines for the Pan-Canadian science curriculum framework.
    Liu X
    J Appl Meas; 2013; 14(3):249-61. PubMed ID: 23816613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Incremental and predictive utility of formative assessment methods of reading comprehension.
    Marcotte AM; Hintze JM
    J Sch Psychol; 2009 Oct; 47(5):315-35. PubMed ID: 19712779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The influence of language knowledge and test components on reading comprehension scores.
    Collins AA; Lindström ER; Sandbank M
    Ann Dyslexia; 2021 Jul; 71(2):238-259. PubMed ID: 33439433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Assessing the format of the presentation of text in developing a Reading Strategy Assessment Tool (R-SAT).
    Gilliam S; Magliano JP; Millis KK; Levinstein I; Boonthum C
    Behav Res Methods; 2007 May; 39(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 17695345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Passageless comprehension on the Nelson-Denny reading test: well above chance for university students.
    Coleman C; Lindstrom J; Nelson J; Lindstrom W; Gregg KN
    J Learn Disabil; 2010; 43(3):244-9. PubMed ID: 19933897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. An analysis of the reading strategies used by adult and student deaf readers.
    Banner A; Wang Y
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2011; 16(1):2-23. PubMed ID: 20591840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Textual complexity adjustments to the English reading comprehension test for undergraduate EFL students.
    Anggia H; Habók A
    Heliyon; 2023 Jan; 9(1):e12891. PubMed ID: 36699275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Assessing cognitively complex strategy use in an untrained domain.
    Jackson GT; Guess RH; McNamara DS
    Top Cogn Sci; 2010 Jan; 2(1):127-37. PubMed ID: 25163626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Assessing children's inference generation: what do tests of reading comprehension measure?
    Bowyer-Crane C; Snowling MJ
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2005 Jun; 75(Pt 2):189-201. PubMed ID: 16033662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Creating a brief rating scale for the assessment of learning disabilities using reliability and true score estimates of the scale's items based on the Rasch model.
    Sideridis G; Padeliadu S
    J Learn Disabil; 2013; 46(2):115-32. PubMed ID: 21685348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. QRAC-the-Code: a comprehension monitoring strategy for middle school social studies textbooks.
    Berkeley S; Riccomini PJ
    J Learn Disabil; 2013; 46(2):154-65. PubMed ID: 21757682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Assessing decoding ability: the role of speed and accuracy and a new composite indicator to measure decoding skill in elementary grades.
    Morlini I; Stella G; Scorza M
    J Learn Disabil; 2015; 48(2):176-95. PubMed ID: 23877769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Exploring dynamic assessment as a means of identifying children at risk of developing comprehension difficulties.
    Elleman AM; Compton DL; Fuchs D; Fuchs LS; Bouton B
    J Learn Disabil; 2011; 44(4):348-57. PubMed ID: 21685351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Curriculum-based measurement oral reading as an indicator of reading achievement: a meta-analysis of the correlational evidence.
    Reschly AL; Busch TW; Betts J; Deno SL; Long JD
    J Sch Psychol; 2009 Dec; 47(6):427-69. PubMed ID: 19808123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Harmful effects of preexisting inappropriate highlighting on reading comprehension and metacognitive accuracy.
    Gier VS; Kreiner DS; Natz-Gonzalez A
    J Gen Psychol; 2009 Jul; 136(3):287-300. PubMed ID: 19650523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An Interactive View of Reading Comprehension: Implications for Assessment.
    Wixson KK
    Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch; 2017 Apr; 48(2):77-83. PubMed ID: 28395296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Improving reading comprehension in reading and listening settings: the effect of two training programmes focusing on metacognition and working memory.
    Carretti B; Caldarola N; Tencati C; Cornoldi C
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2014 Jun; 84(Pt 2):194-210. PubMed ID: 24829118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The appropriateness of the NC state-mandated reading competency test for deaf students as a criterion for high school graduation.
    Lollis J; LaSasso C
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2009; 14(1):76-98. PubMed ID: 18535301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of reading performance in students from 3rd to 7th grade levels, with different text types.
    Dellisa PR; Navas AL
    Codas; 2013; 25(4):342-50. PubMed ID: 24408485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.