323 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25233049)
1. Microfluidic whole genome amplification device for single cell sequencing.
Yu Z; Lu S; Huang Y
Anal Chem; 2014 Oct; 86(19):9386-90. PubMed ID: 25233049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Performance of Whole Genome Amplification Methods and Next-Generation Sequencing for Pre-Implantation Genetic Diagnosis of Chromosomal Abnormalities.
Li N; Wang L; Wang H; Ma M; Wang X; Li Y; Zhang W; Zhang J; Cram DS; Yao Y
J Genet Genomics; 2015 Apr; 42(4):151-9. PubMed ID: 25953353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Uniform and accurate single-cell sequencing based on emulsion whole-genome amplification.
Fu Y; Li C; Lu S; Zhou W; Tang F; Xie XS; Huang Y
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Sep; 112(38):11923-8. PubMed ID: 26340991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of multiple displacement amplification (MDA) and multiple annealing and looping-based amplification cycles (MALBAC) in single-cell sequencing.
Chen M; Song P; Zou D; Hu X; Zhao S; Gao S; Ling F
PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e114520. PubMed ID: 25485707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robust high-performance nanoliter-volume single-cell multiple displacement amplification on planar substrates.
Leung K; Klaus A; Lin BK; Laks E; Biele J; Lai D; Bashashati A; Huang YF; Aniba R; Moksa M; Steif A; Mes-Masson AM; Hirst M; Shah SP; Aparicio S; Hansen CL
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Jul; 113(30):8484-9. PubMed ID: 27412862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Whole genome amplification with SurePlex results in better copy number alteration detection using sequencing data compared to the MALBAC method.
Deleye L; De Coninck D; Christodoulou C; Sante T; Dheedene A; Heindryckx B; Van den Abbeel E; De Sutter P; Menten B; Deforce D; Van Nieuwerburgh F
Sci Rep; 2015 Jun; 5():11711. PubMed ID: 26122179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of variations detection between whole-genome amplification methods used in single-cell resequencing.
Hou Y; Wu K; Shi X; Li F; Song L; Wu H; Dean M; Li G; Tsang S; Jiang R; Zhang X; Li B; Liu G; Bedekar N; Lu N; Xie G; Liang H; Chang L; Wang T; Chen J; Li Y; Zhang X; Yang H; Xu X; Wang L; Wang J
Gigascience; 2015; 4():37. PubMed ID: 26251698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Single-Cell Whole-Genome Amplification and Sequencing: Methodology and Applications.
Huang L; Ma F; Chapman A; Lu S; Xie XS
Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet; 2015; 16():79-102. PubMed ID: 26077818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Comparison of different single cell whole genome amplification methods and MALBAC applications in assisted reproduction].
Yao YX; La YF; Di R; Liu QY; Hu WP; Wang XY; Chu MX
Yi Chuan; 2018 Aug; 40(8):620-631. PubMed ID: 30117418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A new workflow for whole-genome sequencing of single human cells.
Binder V; Bartenhagen C; Okpanyi V; Gombert M; Moehlendick B; Behrens B; Klein HU; Rieder H; Ida Krell PF; Dugas M; Stoecklein NH; Borkhardt A
Hum Mutat; 2014 Oct; 35(10):1260-70. PubMed ID: 25066732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Genomic Analysis of Circulating Tumor Cells at the Single-Cell Level.
Lu S; Chang CJ; Guan Y; Szafer-Glusman E; Punnoose E; Do A; Suttmann B; Gagnon R; Rodriguez A; Landers M; Spoerke J; Lackner MR; Xiao W; Wang Y
J Mol Diagn; 2020 Jun; 22(6):770-781. PubMed ID: 32247862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of whole genome amplification techniques for human single cell exome sequencing.
Borgström E; Paterlini M; Mold JE; Frisen J; Lundeberg J
PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0171566. PubMed ID: 28207771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantitative assessment of single-cell whole genome amplification methods for detecting copy number variation using hippocampal neurons.
Ning L; Li Z; Wang G; Hu W; Hou Q; Tong Y; Zhang M; Chen Y; Qin L; Chen X; Man HY; Liu P; He J
Sci Rep; 2015 Jun; 5():11415. PubMed ID: 26091148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Massively parallel sequencing of micro-manipulated cells targeting a comprehensive panel of disease-causing genes: A comparative evaluation of upstream whole-genome amplification methods.
Deleye L; Gansemans Y; De Coninck D; Van Nieuwerburgh F; Deforce D
PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0196334. PubMed ID: 29698522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Precision oncology using a limited number of cells: optimization of whole genome amplification products for sequencing applications.
Sho S; Court CM; Winograd P; Lee S; Hou S; Graeber TG; Tseng HR; Tomlinson JS
BMC Cancer; 2017 Jul; 17(1):457. PubMed ID: 28666423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The comparison of the performance of four whole genome amplification kits on ion proton platform in copy number variation detection.
Zhang X; Liang B; Xu X; Zhou F; Kong L; Shen J; Xia Y; Xuan L; Mao Y; Xue Y; Liu C; Tan J
Biosci Rep; 2017 Aug; 37(4):. PubMed ID: 28572171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Genome-wide detection of single-nucleotide and copy-number variations of a single human cell.
Zong C; Lu S; Chapman AR; Xie XS
Science; 2012 Dec; 338(6114):1622-6. PubMed ID: 23258894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A quantitative comparison of single-cell whole genome amplification methods.
de Bourcy CF; De Vlaminck I; Kanbar JN; Wang J; Gawad C; Quake SR
PLoS One; 2014; 9(8):e105585. PubMed ID: 25136831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Microfluidic device for DNA amplification of single cancer cells isolated from whole blood by self-seeding microwells.
Yang Y; Rho HS; Stevens M; Tibbe AG; Gardeniers H; Terstappen LW
Lab Chip; 2015 Nov; 15(22):4331-7. PubMed ID: 26400672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of single cell sequencing data between two whole genome amplification methods on two sequencing platforms.
Chen D; Zhen H; Qiu Y; Liu P; Zeng P; Xia J; Shi Q; Xie L; Zhu Z; Gao Y; Huang G; Wang J; Yang H; Chen F
Sci Rep; 2018 Mar; 8(1):4963. PubMed ID: 29563514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
