These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25233839)

  • 1. Lord-Wingersky Algorithm Version 2.0 for Hierarchical Item Factor Models with Applications in Test Scoring, Scale Alignment, and Model Fit Testing.
    Cai L
    Psychometrika; 2015 Jun; 80(2):535-59. PubMed ID: 25233839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lord-Wingersky Algorithm Version 2.5 with Applications.
    Huang S; Cai L
    Psychometrika; 2021 Dec; 86(4):973-993. PubMed ID: 34313920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Note on the Poisson's Binomial Distribution in Item Response Theory.
    González J; Wiberg M; von Davier AA
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2016 Jun; 40(4):302-310. PubMed ID: 29881055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Limited-information goodness-of-fit testing of hierarchical item factor models.
    Cai L; Hansen M
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 May; 66(2):245-76. PubMed ID: 22642552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Identifying an appropriate measurement modeling approach for the Mini-Mental State Examination.
    Rubright JD; Nandakumar R; Karlawish J
    Psychol Assess; 2016 Feb; 28(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 26029945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing item fit for unidimensional item response theory models using residuals from estimated item response functions.
    Haberman SJ; Sinharay S; Chon KH
    Psychometrika; 2013 Jul; 78(3):417-40. PubMed ID: 25106393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Generalized full-information item bifactor analysis.
    Cai L; Yang JS; Hansen M
    Psychol Methods; 2011 Sep; 16(3):221-48. PubMed ID: 21534682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Hierarchical Multi-Unidimensional IRT Approach for Analyzing Sparse, Multi-Group Data for Integrative Data Analysis.
    Huo Y; de la Torre J; Mun EY; Kim SY; Ray AE; Jiao Y; White HR
    Psychometrika; 2015 Sep; 80(3):834-55. PubMed ID: 25265910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On the Complexity of Item Response Theory Models.
    Bonifay W; Cai L
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2017; 52(4):465-484. PubMed ID: 28426237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of the bifactor model in resolving dimensionality issues in health outcomes measures.
    Reise SP; Morizot J; Hays RD
    Qual Life Res; 2007; 16 Suppl 1():19-31. PubMed ID: 17479357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adaptive Testing With a Hierarchical Item Response Theory Model.
    Wang W; Kingston N
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Jan; 43(1):51-67. PubMed ID: 30573934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Motivational-Developmental Free Response Assessment Through a Bifactor Lens.
    Alpizar D; French BF
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():770327. PubMed ID: 34925171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Approximating Bifactor IRT True-Score Equating With a Projective Item Response Model.
    Kim KY; Cho UH
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2020 May; 44(3):215-218. PubMed ID: 32341608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Approximate Functional Relationship between IRT and CTT Item Discrimination Indices: A Simulation, Validation, and Practical Extension of Lord's (1980) Formula.
    Kulas JT; Smith JA; Xu H
    J Appl Meas; 2017; 18(4):393-407. PubMed ID: 29252208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Joint Maximum Likelihood Estimation for High-Dimensional Exploratory Item Factor Analysis.
    Chen Y; Li X; Zhang S
    Psychometrika; 2019 Mar; 84(1):124-146. PubMed ID: 30456747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Limited-information goodness-of-fit testing of diagnostic classification item response models.
    Hansen M; Cai L; Monroe S; Li Z
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2016 Nov; 69(3):225-252. PubMed ID: 27404336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Investigating psychometric properties and dimensional structure of an educational environment measure (DREEM) using Mokken scale analysis - a pragmatic approach.
    Palmgren PJ; Brodin U; Nilsson GH; Watson R; Stenfors T
    BMC Med Educ; 2018 Oct; 18(1):235. PubMed ID: 30305143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Power Analysis for the Wald, LR, Score, and Gradient Tests in a Marginal Maximum Likelihood Framework: Applications in IRT.
    Zimmer F; Draxler C; Debelak R
    Psychometrika; 2023 Dec; 88(4):1249-1298. PubMed ID: 36029390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Item Response Models for Forced-Choice Questionnaires: A Common Framework.
    Brown A
    Psychometrika; 2016 Mar; 81(1):135-60. PubMed ID: 25663304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Item-focussed Trees for the Identification of Items in Differential Item Functioning.
    Tutz G; Berger M
    Psychometrika; 2016 Sep; 81(3):727-50. PubMed ID: 26596721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.