These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25234527)

  • 21. Effect of drilling dimension on implant placement torque and early osseointegration stages: an experimental study in dogs.
    Campos FE; Gomes JB; Marin C; Teixeira HS; Suzuki M; Witek L; Zanetta-Barbosa D; Coelho PG
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jan; 70(1):e43-50. PubMed ID: 22182660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. How does the rate of dentoalveolar distraction affect the bone regenerate produced?
    Spencer AC; Campbell PM; Dechow P; Ellis ML; Buschang PH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):e211-21. PubMed ID: 22051499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of dehiscences to the bone response of implants with an Acid-etched surface: an experimental study in miniature pigs.
    Ruehe B; Heberer S; Bayreuther K; Nelson K
    J Oral Implantol; 2011; 37(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 20557147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Implant placement for periosteal expansion osteogenesis using beta-tricalcium phosphate block: an experimental study in dogs.
    Yamauchi K; Takahashi T; Funaki K; Miyamoto I; Yamashita Y
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Dec; 108(6):861-6. PubMed ID: 19766024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Alveolar width distraction osteogenesis for early implant placement.
    Laster Z; Rachmiel A; Jensen OT
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Dec; 63(12):1724-30. PubMed ID: 16297692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of cranial bone transport distraction with and without adipose grafting.
    Koch FP; Yuhasz MM; Travieso R; Wong K; Clune J; Zhuang ZW; Van Houten J; Steinbacher DM
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 May; 25(3):766-71. PubMed ID: 24820707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Osteogenic potential of effective bone engineering using dental pulp stem cells, bone marrow stem cells, and periosteal cells for osseointegration of dental implants.
    Ito K; Yamada Y; Nakamura S; Ueda M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):947-54. PubMed ID: 22010075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [The effect of HA mixed with adenovirus mediated rhBMP-2 transferred BMSCs of goats on distraction osteogenesis].
    Lin Z; Zhu Z; Tang T; Dai K; Lou J; Meng F
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Feb; 22(2):134-8. PubMed ID: 18365605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Osteogenic capacities of tibial and cranial periosteum: a biochemical and histologic study.
    Bilkay U; Tokat C; Helvaci E; Ozek C; Zekioglu O; Onat T; Songur E
    J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Mar; 19(2):453-8. PubMed ID: 18362726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Analysis of new bone formation induced by periosteal distraction in a rat calvarium model.
    Saulacic N; Schaller B; Iizuka T; Buser D; Hug C; Bosshardt DD
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Apr; 15(2):283-91. PubMed ID: 21554531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Induced osteogenesis by periosteal distraction.
    Schmidt BL; Kung L; Jones C; Casap N
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2002 Oct; 60(10):1170-5. PubMed ID: 12378493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Early cortical bone healing around loaded titanium implants: a histological study in the rabbit.
    Slaets E; Naert I; Carmeliet G; Duyck J
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Feb; 20(2):126-34. PubMed ID: 19191791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Callotasis in nonvascularized periosteal bone grafts and the role of periosteum: a new contribution to the concept of distraction osteogenesis.
    Ozerdem OR; Kivanç O; Tuncer I; Acartürk S; Göcenler L; Gümürdülü D
    Ann Plast Surg; 1998 Aug; 41(2):148-55. PubMed ID: 9718147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. VEGF facilitates periosteal distraction-induced osteogenesis in rabbits: a micro-computerized tomography study.
    Casap N; Venezia NB; Wilensky A; Samuni Y
    Tissue Eng Part A; 2008 Feb; 14(2):247-53. PubMed ID: 18333777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Periosteum-Induced Bone Formation by Distraction Osteogenesis: Histologic and Microcomputed Tomography Analysis.
    Nakahara K; Haga-Tsujimura M; Iizuka T; Saulacic N
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(4):785-92. PubMed ID: 27447143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Vascular proliferation and blood supply during distraction osteogenesis: a scanning electron microscopic observation.
    Choi IH; Ahn JH; Chung CY; Cho TJ
    J Orthop Res; 2000 Sep; 18(5):698-705. PubMed ID: 11117289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effect of distraction upon bone, muscle, and periosteum.
    Yasui N; Kojimoto H; Shimizu H; Shimomura Y
    Orthop Clin North Am; 1991 Oct; 22(4):563-7. PubMed ID: 1945334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of the effects of guided bone regeneration and periosteum on newly formed bone in a distraction gap.
    Kilic E; Alkan A; Demetoglu U; Ozturk M
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Sep; 22(5):1871-4. PubMed ID: 21959452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Possible problems of moulding the regenerate in mandibular distraction osteogenesis -- experimental aspects in a canine model.
    Kunz C; Adolphs N; Buescher P; Hammer B; Rahn B
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2005 Dec; 33(6):377-85. PubMed ID: 16253512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Experimental studies on the effect of osteotomy technique on the bone regeneration in distraction osteogenesis.
    Krawczyk A; Kuropka P; Kuryszko J; Wall A; Dragan S; Kulej M
    Bone; 2007 Mar; 40(3):781-91. PubMed ID: 17140872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.