587 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25234528)
1. Hydroxyapatite and silk combination-coated dental implants result in superior bone formation in the peri-implant area compared with hydroxyapatite and collagen combination-coated implants.
Kweon H; Lee SW; Hahn BD; Lee YC; Kim SG
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 72(10):1928-36. PubMed ID: 25234528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hydroxyapatite and collagen combination-coated dental implants display better bone formation in the peri-implant area than the same combination plus bone morphogenetic protein-2-coated implants, hydroxyapatite only coated implants, and uncoated implants.
Lee SW; Hahn BD; Kang TY; Lee MJ; Choi JY; Kim MK; Kim SG
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Jan; 72(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 24331565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Aerosol deposition of hydroxyapatite and 4-hexylresorcinol coatings on titanium alloys for dental implants.
Kim SG; Hahn BD; Park DS; Lee YC; Choi EJ; Chae WS; Baek DH; Choi JY
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 69(11):e354-63. PubMed ID: 21821331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vivo comparison of bone formation on titanium implant surfaces coated with biomimetically deposited calcium phosphate or electrochemically deposited hydroxyapatite.
Yang GL; He FM; Song E; Hu JA; Wang XX; Zhao SF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):669-80. PubMed ID: 20657861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Early bone healing around 2 different experimental, HA grit-blasted, and dual acid-etched titanium implant surfaces. A pilot study in rabbits.
Gobbato L; Arguello E; Martin IS; Hawley CE; Griffin TJ
Implant Dent; 2012 Dec; 21(6):454-60. PubMed ID: 23149502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Osteogenic responses to zirconia with hydroxyapatite coating by aerosol deposition.
Cho Y; Hong J; Ryoo H; Kim D; Park J; Han J
J Dent Res; 2015 Mar; 94(3):491-9. PubMed ID: 25586588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bone response to machined and resorbable blast material titanium implants: an experimental study in rabbits.
Piattelli M; Scarano A; Paolantonio M; Iezzi G; Petrone G; Piattelli A
J Oral Implantol; 2002; 28(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 12498456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of hydroxyapatite nanocrystals on early bone formation surrounding dental implants.
Svanborg LM; Hoffman M; Andersson M; Currie F; Kjellin P; Wennerberg A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 40(3):308-15. PubMed ID: 21111575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The role of surface implant treatments on the biological behavior of SaOS-2 osteoblast-like cells. An in vitro comparative study.
Conserva E; Menini M; Ravera G; Pera P
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24(8):880-9. PubMed ID: 22251013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of a cell adhesion molecule coating on the blasted surface of titanium implants on bone healing in the rabbit femur.
Park JW; Lee SG; Choi BJ; Suh JY
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):533-41. PubMed ID: 17929513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Increased bone formation around coated implants.
Stadlinger B; Bierbaum S; Grimmer S; Schulz MC; Kuhlisch E; Scharnweber D; Eckelt U; Mai R
J Clin Periodontol; 2009 Aug; 36(8):698-704. PubMed ID: 19531092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of electrochemically deposited nanohydroxyapatite on bone bonding of sandblasted/dual acid-etched titanium implant.
He F; Yang G; Wang X; Zhao S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):790-9. PubMed ID: 19865618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The role of titanium implant surface modification with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles in progressive early bone-implant fixation in vivo.
Lin A; Wang CJ; Kelly J; Gubbi P; Nishimura I
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):808-16. PubMed ID: 19865620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. New bone formation between bare titanium surface and hydroxyapatite coating by the aerosol deposition technique in the nasal mucosal penetration model.
Park YJ; Choi KH; Hahn BD; Lee YC; Song JY; Park YT; Kim SG
J Craniofac Surg; 2013 Mar; 24(2):632-5. PubMed ID: 23524763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical comparison of different surface modifications for dental implants.
Ferguson SJ; Langhoff JD; Voelter K; von Rechenberg B; Scharnweber D; Bierbaum S; Schnabelrauch M; Kautz AR; Frauchiger VM; Mueller TL; van Lenthe GH; Schlottig F
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(6):1037-46. PubMed ID: 19216272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of H2O2/HCl heat treatment of implants on in vivo peri-implant bone formation.
Yang GL; He FM; Zhao SS; Wang XX; Zhao SF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(6):1020-8. PubMed ID: 19216270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Histomorphometric analyses of hydroxyapatite-coated and uncoated titanium implants. The importance of the implant design.
Gottlander M; Albrektsson T
Clin Oral Implants Res; 1992 Jun; 3(2):71-6. PubMed ID: 15900671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In vivo evaluation of cp Ti implants with modified surfaces by laser beam with and without hydroxyapatite chemical deposition and without and with thermal treatment: topographic characterization and histomorphometric analysis in rabbits.
Queiroz TP; de Molon RS; Souza FÁ; Margonar R; Thomazini AH; Guastaldi AC; Hochuli-Vieira E
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Mar; 21(2):685-699. PubMed ID: 27530186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bone response to the multilayer BMP-2 gene coated porous titanium implant surface.
Jiang QH; Liu L; Peel S; Yang GL; Zhao SF; He FM
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24(8):853-61. PubMed ID: 22168601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biological performance of chemical hydroxyapatite coating associated with implant surface modification by laser beam: biomechanical study in rabbit tibias.
Faeda RS; Tavares HS; Sartori R; Guastaldi AC; Marcantonio E
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1706-15. PubMed ID: 19615586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
