These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25234603)

  • 21. Ablation of typical atrial flutter: a prospective randomized study of cooled-tip versus 8-mm-tip catheters.
    Melo SL; Scanavacca MI; Darrieux FC; Hachul DT; Sosa EA
    Arq Bras Cardiol; 2007 Mar; 88(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 17533467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. First clinical experience of a dedicated irrigated-tip radiofrequency ablation catheter for the ablation of cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent atrial flutter.
    Knecht S; Burch F; Reichlin T; Spies F; Mühl A; Altmann D; Ammann P; Schaer B; Osswald S; Sticherling C; Kühne M
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2018 Apr; 107(4):281-286. PubMed ID: 29204691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A new methodology for atrial flutter ablation by direct visualization of cavotricuspid conduction with voltage gradient mapping: a comparison to standard techniques.
    Bailin SJ; Johnson WB; Jumrussirikul P; Sorentino D; West R
    Europace; 2013 Jul; 15(7):1013-8. PubMed ID: 23447574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Anatomic characterization of cavotricuspid isthmus by 3D transesophageal echocardiography in patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation of typical atrial flutter.
    Regoli F; Faletra F; Marcon S; Leo LA; Dequarti MC; Caputo ML; Conte G; Moccetti T; Auricchio A
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Jan; 19(1):84-91. PubMed ID: 28180237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Randomized comparison of cavotricuspid isthmus ablation for atrial flutter using an open irrigation-tip versus a large-tip radiofrequency ablation catheter.
    Ilg KJ; Kühne M; Crawford T; Chugh A; Jongnarangsin K; Good E; Pelosi F; Bogun F; Morady F; Oral H
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2011 Sep; 22(9):1007-12. PubMed ID: 21453368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Prospective randomized comparison of a steerable versus a non-steerable sheath for typical atrial flutter ablation.
    Matsuo S; Yamane T; Tokuda M; Date T; Hioki M; Narui R; Ito K; Yamashita S; Hama Y; Nakane T; Inada K; Shibayama K; Miyanaga S; Yoshida H; Miyazaki H; Abe K; Sugimoto K; Taniguchi I; Yoshimura M
    Europace; 2010 Mar; 12(3):402-9. PubMed ID: 20083483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. High Incidence of Low Catheter-Tissue Contact Force at the Cavotricuspid Isthmus During Catheter Ablation of Atrial Flutter: Implications for Achieving Isthmus Block.
    Kumar S; Morton JB; Lee G; Halloran K; Kistler PM; Kalman JM
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2015 Aug; 26(8):826-831. PubMed ID: 25952766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Safety, efficacy, and reproducibility of cavotricuspid isthmus ablation guided by the ablation index: acute results of the FLAI study.
    Viola G; Stabile G; Bandino S; Rossi L; Marrazzo N; Pecora D; Bottoni N; Solimene F; Schillaci V; Scaglione M; Ocello S; Baiocchi C; Santoro A; Donzelli S; De Ruvo E; Lavalle C; Sanchez-Gomez JM; Pastor JFA; Grandio PC; Ferraris F; Castro A; Rebellato L; Marchese P; Adao L; Primo J; Barra S; Casu G
    Europace; 2021 Feb; 23(2):264-270. PubMed ID: 33212484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of electroanatomically guided versus conventional catheter ablation of typical atrial flutter on the fluoroscopy time and resource use: a prospective randomized multicenter study.
    Hindricks G; Willems S; Kautzner J; De Chillou C; Wiedemann M; Schepel S; Piorkowski C; Risius T; Kottkamp H;
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2009 Jul; 20(7):734-40. PubMed ID: 19298568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cavotricuspid isthmus ablation by means of very high power, short-duration, temperature-controlled lesions.
    Schillaci V; Strisciuglio T; Stabile G; Salito A; Arestia A; Agresta A; Shopova G; De Simone A; Solimene F
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2022 Oct; 65(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 35378611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Characteristics of Cavotricuspid Isthmus Ablation for Atrial Flutter Guided by Novel Parameters Using a Contact Force Catheter.
    Gould PA; Booth C; Dauber K; Ng K; Claughton A; Kaye GC
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2016 Dec; 27(12):1429-1436. PubMed ID: 27569722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Six-month follow-up of isthmus-dependent right atrial flutter ablation using a remote magnetic catheter navigation system: a case-control study.
    Huo Y; Hindricks G; Piorkowski C; Bollmann A; Wetzel U; Sommer P; Gaspar T; Kottkamp H; Arya A
    Acta Cardiol; 2010 Jun; 65(3):279-83. PubMed ID: 20666264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Incremental pacing for the diagnosis of complete cavotricuspid isthmus block during radiofrequency ablation of atrial flutter.
    Bazan V; Martí-Almor J; Perez-Rodon J; Bruguera J; Gerstenfeld EP; Callans DJ; Marchlinski FE
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2010 Jan; 21(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 19656252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The influence of cavotricuspid isthmus length on total radiofrequency energy to cure right atrial flutter.
    Schernthaner C; Haidinger B; Brandt MC; Kraus J; Danmayr F; Hoppe UC; Strohmer B
    Kardiol Pol; 2016; 74(3):237-43. PubMed ID: 26305365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effectiveness and safety of high-power and short-duration ablation for cavotricuspid isthmus ablation in atrial flutter.
    Kwon HJ; Lee SS; Park YJ; Park SJ; Park KM; Kim JS; On YK
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2020 Sep; 43(9):941-946. PubMed ID: 32696467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison between the novel diamond temp and the classical 8-mm tip ablation catheters in the setting of typical atrial flutter.
    Ramak R; Lipartiti F; Mojica J; Monaco C; Bisignani A; Eltsov I; Sorgente A; Capulzini L; Paparella G; Deruyter B; Iacopino S; Motoc AI; Luchian ML; Osorio TG; Overeinder I; Bala G; Almorad A; Ströker E; Sieira J; Jordaens L; Brugada P; de Asmundis C; Chierchia GB
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2022 Sep; 64(3):751-757. PubMed ID: 35239069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Ablation index-guided high-power vs. moderate-power cavotricuspid isthmus ablation.
    Chikata A; Kato T; Usuda K; Fujita S; Maruyama M; Otowa K; Usuda K; Kusayama T; Tsuda T; Hayashi K; Takamura M
    Heart Vessels; 2023 Jan; 38(1):90-95. PubMed ID: 35852611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cavo-tricuspid isthmus radiofrequency ablation using a novel remote navigation catheter system in patients with typical atrial flutter.
    López-Gil M; Salgado R; Merino JL; Datino T; Figueroa J; Arenal A; Mejía E; Salguero R; Fontenla A; Arribas F
    Europace; 2014 Apr; 16(4):558-62. PubMed ID: 24058180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The non-fluoroscopic navigation reduces significantly not only the fluoroscopic exposure during catheter ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus but the total radiofrequency time as well.
    Shalganov T; Stoyanov M; Kunev B
    Acta Cardiol; 2017 Apr; 72(2):167-171. PubMed ID: 28597788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Tissue characterization of acute lesions during cardiac magnetic resonance-guided ablation of cavo-tricuspid isthmus-dependent atrial flutter: a feasibility study.
    Bijvoet GP; Nies HMJM; Holtackers RJ; Martens BM; Smink J; Linz D; Vernooy K; Wildberger JE; Nijveldt R; Chaldoupi SM; Mihl C
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2024 Apr; 25(5):635-644. PubMed ID: 38156446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.