These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Wild, free-living rufous hummingbirds do not use geometric cues in a spatial task. Hornsby MA; Hurly TA; Hamilton CE; Pritchard DJ; Healy SD Behav Processes; 2014 Oct; 108():138-41. PubMed ID: 25452077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. From a sequential pattern, temporal adjustments emerge in hummingbird traplining. Tello-Ramos MC; Hurly AT; Healy SD Integr Zool; 2019 Mar; 14(2):182-192. PubMed ID: 30585437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Wild hummingbirds can use the geometry of a flower array. Hornsby MAW; Healy SD; Hurly TA Behav Processes; 2017 Jun; 139():33-37. PubMed ID: 28161360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Size is relative: use of relational concepts by wild hummingbirds. Brown T; Hurly TA; Healy SD; Tello-Ramos MC Proc Biol Sci; 2022 Mar; 289(1971):20212508. PubMed ID: 35317668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Do rufous hummingbirds (Selasphorus rufus) use visual beacons? Hurly TA; Franz S; Healy SD Anim Cogn; 2010 Mar; 13(2):377-83. PubMed ID: 19768647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Estimating on the fly: The approximate number system in rufous hummingbirds (Selasphorus rufus). Corliss M; Brown T; Hurly TA; Healy SD; Tello-Ramos MC Learn Behav; 2021 Mar; 49(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 33319341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Wild hummingbirds rely on landmarks not geometry when learning an array of flowers. Hurly TA; Fox TA; Zwueste DM; Healy SD Anim Cogn; 2014 Sep; 17(5):1157-65. PubMed ID: 24691650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Wild rufous hummingbirds use local landmarks to return to rewarded locations. Pritchard DJ; Scott RD; Healy SD; Hurly AT Behav Processes; 2016 Jan; 122():59-66. PubMed ID: 26551275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. One-trial spatial learning: wild hummingbirds relocate a reward after a single visit. Flores-Abreu IN; Hurly TA; Healy SD Anim Cogn; 2012 Jul; 15(4):631-7. PubMed ID: 22526688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Spatial association learning by rufous hummingbirds (Selasphorus rufus): effects of relative spacing among stimuli. Brown GS J Comp Psychol; 1994 Mar; 108(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 8174343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A configural dominant account of contextual cueing: Configural cues are stronger than colour cues. Kunar MA; John R; Sweetman H Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(7):1366-82. PubMed ID: 24199842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Individual differences in decision making by foraging hummingbirds. Morgan KV; Hurly TA; Healy SD Behav Processes; 2014 Nov; 109 Pt B():195-200. PubMed ID: 25181327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of landmark distance and stability on accuracy of reward relocation. Pritchard DJ; Hurly TA; Healy SD Anim Cogn; 2015 Nov; 18(6):1285-97. PubMed ID: 26198691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Colour cues or spatial cues? Context-dependent preferences in the European greenfinch (Carduelis chloris). Herborn K; Alexander L; Arnold KE Anim Cogn; 2011 Mar; 14(2):269-77. PubMed ID: 21170666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]