These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25234888)

  • 1. A model that predicts the binaural advantage to speech intelligibility from the mixed target and interferer signals.
    Cosentino S; Marquardt T; McAlpine D; Culling JF; Falk TH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Feb; 135(2):796-807. PubMed ID: 25234888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Revision and validation of a binaural model for speech intelligibility in noise.
    Jelfs S; Culling JF; Lavandier M
    Hear Res; 2011 May; 275(1-2):96-104. PubMed ID: 21156201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Speech intelligibility prediction in reverberation: Towards an integrated model of speech transmission, spatial unmasking, and binaural de-reverberation.
    Leclère T; Lavandier M; Culling JF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3335-45. PubMed ID: 26093423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Microscopic prediction of speech intelligibility in spatially distributed speech-shaped noise for normal-hearing listeners.
    Geravanchizadeh M; Fallah A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):4004-15. PubMed ID: 26723354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Binaural prediction of speech intelligibility in reverberant rooms with multiple noise sources.
    Lavandier M; Jelfs S; Culling JF; Watkins AJ; Raimond AP; Makin SJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jan; 131(1):218-31. PubMed ID: 22280586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modeling the effects of a single reflection on binaural speech intelligibility.
    Rennies J; Warzybok A; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1556-67. PubMed ID: 24606290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Binaural speech intelligibility in rooms with variations in spatial location of sources and modulation depth of noise interferers.
    Collin B; Lavandier M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1146-59. PubMed ID: 23927114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The benefit of binaural hearing in a cocktail party: effect of location and type of interferer.
    Hawley ML; Litovsky RY; Culling JF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Feb; 115(2):833-43. PubMed ID: 15000195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Application of a short-time version of the Equalization-Cancellation model to speech intelligibility experiments with speech maskers.
    Wan R; Durlach NI; Colburn HS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):768-76. PubMed ID: 25096111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A dynamic binaural harmonic-cancellation model to predict speech intelligibility against a harmonic masker varying in intonation, temporal envelope, and location.
    Prud'homme L; Lavandier M; Best V
    Hear Res; 2022 Dec; 426():108535. PubMed ID: 35654633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modelling binaural unmasking and the intelligibility of speech in noise and reverberation for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Vicente T; Buchholz JM; Lavandier M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Nov; 150(5):3275. PubMed ID: 34852607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A joint framework for blind prediction of binaural speech intelligibility and perceived listening effort.
    Rennies J; Röttges S; Huber R; Hauth CF; Brand T
    Hear Res; 2022 Dec; 426():108598. PubMed ID: 35995688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prediction of the influence of reverberation on binaural speech intelligibility in noise and in quiet.
    Rennies J; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):2999-3012. PubMed ID: 22087928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Further validation of a binaural model predicting speech intelligibility against envelope-modulated noises.
    Vicente T; Lavandier M
    Hear Res; 2020 May; 390():107937. PubMed ID: 32192940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Application of an extended equalization-cancellation model to speech intelligibility with spatially distributed maskers.
    Wan R; Durlach NI; Colburn HS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Dec; 128(6):3678-90. PubMed ID: 21218900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Binaural Grouping Model for Predicting Speech Intelligibility in Multitalker Environments.
    Mi J; Colburn HS
    Trends Hear; 2016 Oct; 20():. PubMed ID: 27698261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modeling Binaural Unmasking of Speech Using a Blind Binaural Processing Stage.
    Hauth CF; Berning SC; Kollmeier B; Brand T
    Trends Hear; 2020; 24():2331216520975630. PubMed ID: 33305690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of reverberation and masker fluctuations on binaural unmasking of speech.
    George EL; Festen JM; Goverts ST
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1581-91. PubMed ID: 22978887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Revision, extension, and evaluation of a binaural speech intelligibility model.
    Beutelmann R; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Apr; 127(4):2479-97. PubMed ID: 20370031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speech reception with different bilateral directional processing schemes: Influence of binaural hearing, audiometric asymmetry, and acoustic scenario.
    Neher T; Wagener KC; Latzel M
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():36-48. PubMed ID: 28783570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.