These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. [Obstetrical ultrasound: can the fetus hear the wave and feel the heat?]. Abramowicz JS; Kremkau FW; Merz E Ultraschall Med; 2012 Jun; 33(3):215-7. PubMed ID: 22700164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stable, inexpensive, low-frequency sine wave generator using digital techniques. Podolske J Rev Sci Instrum; 1979 Aug; 50(8):1010-2. PubMed ID: 18699654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Acoustic characteristics of an electrodynamic planar digital loudspeaker. Furihata K; Hayama A; Asano DK; Yanagisawa T J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jul; 114(1):174-84. PubMed ID: 12880031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of loudspeaker nonlinear distortion on personal sound zones. Ma X; Hegarty PJ; Pedersen JA; Larsen JJ J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Jan; 143(1):51. PubMed ID: 29390765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of negative middle ear pressure on distortion product otoacoustic emissions and application of a compensation procedure in humans. Sun XM; Shaver MD Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):191-202. PubMed ID: 19194291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Standard parameters of distortion products]. Martínez Ibargüen A; Santaolalla Montoya F; Sánchez del Rey A; Macías Fernández A Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 1995; 46(4):247-52. PubMed ID: 7546848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Compact and Low-Cost MEMS Loudspeaker for Digital Hearing Aids. Sang-Soo Je ; Rivas F; Diaz RE; Jiuk Kwon ; Jeonghwan Kim ; Bakkaloglu B; Kiaei S; Junseok Chae IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst; 2009 Oct; 3(5):348-58. PubMed ID: 23853273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Post-photoreceptoral activity dominates primate photopic 32-Hz ERG for sine-, square-, and pulsed stimuli. Kondo M; Sieving PA Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Jul; 43(7):2500-7. PubMed ID: 12091456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A method for the generation of complex vibrotactile stimuli. Morley JW; Crawford EN; Ferrington DG; Archer JS; Turman AB; Rowe MJ J Neurosci Methods; 1991 Jun; 38(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 1921468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of sound and light on heart rate variability. Hori K; Yamakawa M; Tanaka N; Murakami H; Kaya M; Hori S J Hum Ergol (Tokyo); 2005 Dec; 34(1-2):25-34. PubMed ID: 17393762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the frequency selectivity of contralateral acoustic stimulation on the active mechanisms of the organ of corti by analyzing the changes in the amplitude of transitory evoked otoacoustic emissions and distortion products. Ibargüen AM; Santaolalla Montoya F; del Rey AS; Fernandez JM J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Aug; 37(4):457-62. PubMed ID: 19128576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Harmonic Error Cancellation for Accurate Square-wave-based Bio-Impedance Measurements. Subhan S; Ha S Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2018 Jul; 2018():4273-4276. PubMed ID: 30441298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Second harmonic inversion for ultrasound contrast harmonic imaging. Pasovic M; Danilouchkine M; Faez T; van Neer PL; Cachard C; van der Steen AF; Basset O; de Jong N Phys Med Biol; 2011 Jun; 56(11):3163-80. PubMed ID: 21540492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Harmonic GHz surface-acoustic-wave filters with unidirectional transducers. Huegli R IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 1993; 40(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 18263172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Frequency difference limens of pure tones and harmonics within complex stimuli in Mongolian gerbils and humans. Klinge A; Klump GM J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jan; 125(1):304-14. PubMed ID: 19173417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Nonlinear crosstalk in broadband multi-channel echosounders. Khodabandeloo B; Ona E; Macaulay GJ; Korneliussen R J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Jan; 149(1):87. PubMed ID: 33514135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ear canal pressure variations versus negative middle ear pressure: comparison using distortion product otoacoustic emission measurement in humans. Sun XM Ear Hear; 2012; 33(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 21747284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Distortion product emissions in humans. I. Basic properties in normally hearing subjects. Lonsbury-Martin BL; Harris FP; Stagner BB; Hawkins MD; Martin GK Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1990 May; 147():3-14. PubMed ID: 2110797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]