159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25234995)
1. On the near non-existence of "pure" energetic masking release for speech.
Stone MA; Moore BC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Apr; 135(4):1967-77. PubMed ID: 25234995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Notionally steady background noise acts primarily as a modulation masker of speech.
Stone MA; Füllgrabe C; Moore BC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jul; 132(1):317-26. PubMed ID: 22779480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of fluctuating maskers for speech recognition tests.
Francart T; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):2-13. PubMed ID: 21091261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
Bernstein JG; Grant KW
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3358-72. PubMed ID: 19425676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Set-size procedures for controlling variations in speech-reception performance with a fluctuating masker.
Bernstein JG; Summers V; Iyer N; Brungart DS
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2676-89. PubMed ID: 23039460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pupil dilation uncovers extra listening effort in the presence of a single-talker masker.
Koelewijn T; Zekveld AA; Festen JM; Kramer SE
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 21921797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of masker modulation depth on speech masking release.
Gnansia D; Jourdes V; Lorenzi C
Hear Res; 2008 May; 239(1-2):60-8. PubMed ID: 18434049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predicting speech intelligibility based on the signal-to-noise envelope power ratio after modulation-frequency selective processing.
Jørgensen S; Dau T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1475-87. PubMed ID: 21895088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Relationship between masking release in fluctuating maskers and speech reception thresholds in stationary noise.
Christiansen C; Dau T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1655-66. PubMed ID: 22978894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Masking release for consonant features in temporally fluctuating background noise.
Füllgrabe C; Berthommier F; Lorenzi C
Hear Res; 2006 Jan; 211(1-2):74-84. PubMed ID: 16289579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech.
Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Speech recognition in fluctuating and continuous maskers: effects of hearing loss and presentation level.
Summers V; Molis MR
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Apr; 47(2):245-56. PubMed ID: 15157127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The combined effects of reverberation and nonstationary noise on sentence intelligibility.
George EL; Festen JM; Houtgast T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Aug; 124(2):1269-77. PubMed ID: 18681613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Recovery from prior stimulation: masking of speech by interrupted noise for younger and older adults with normal hearing.
Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Apr; 113(4 Pt 1):2084-94. PubMed ID: 12703719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The influence of masker type on early reflection processing and speech intelligibility (L).
Arweiler I; Buchholz JM; Dau T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jan; 133(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 23297878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of periodic masker interruption on the intelligibility of interrupted speech.
Iyer N; Brungart DS; Simpson BD
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1693. PubMed ID: 17927429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Benefit of temporal fine structure to speech perception in noise measured with controlled temporal envelopes.
Eaves JM; Summerfield AQ; Kitterick PT
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):501-7. PubMed ID: 21786915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of simulated cochlear-implant processing on speech reception in fluctuating maskers.
Qin MK; Oxenham AJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jul; 114(1):446-54. PubMed ID: 12880055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of spectral smearing and temporal fine-structure distortion on the fluctuating-masker benefit for speech at a fixed signal-to-noise ratio.
Bernstein JG; Brungart DS
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):473-88. PubMed ID: 21786913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
