These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25235005)

  • 21. Effects of periodic interruptions on the intelligibility of speech based on temporal fine-structure or envelope cues.
    Gilbert G; Bergeras I; Voillery D; Lorenzi C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1336. PubMed ID: 17927396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
    Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Bologna WJ; Dubno JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of contextual cues on speech recognition in simulated electric-acoustic stimulation.
    Kong YY; Donaldson G; Somarowthu A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 May; 137(5):2846-57. PubMed ID: 25994712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effects of the addition of low-level, low-noise noise on the intelligibility of sentences processed to remove temporal envelope information.
    Hopkins K; Moore BC; Stone MA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):2150-61. PubMed ID: 20968385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A correlational method to concurrently measure envelope and temporal fine structure weights: effects of age, cochlear pathology, and spectral shaping.
    Fogerty D; Humes LE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1679-89. PubMed ID: 22978896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Spatial hearing benefits demonstrated with presentation of acoustic temporal fine structure cues in bilateral cochlear implant listeners.
    Churchill TH; Kan A; Goupell MJ; Litovsky RY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Sep; 136(3):1246. PubMed ID: 25190398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Speech identification based on temporal fine structure cues.
    Sheft S; Ardoint M; Lorenzi C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jul; 124(1):562-75. PubMed ID: 18646999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The impact of temporal fine structure and signal envelope on auditory motion perception.
    Warnecke M; Peng ZE; Litovsky RY
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0238125. PubMed ID: 32822439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Temporal fine structure influences voicing confusions for consonant identification in multi-talker babble.
    Viswanathan V; Shinn-Cunningham BG; Heinz MG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Oct; 150(4):2664. PubMed ID: 34717498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Improved perception of speech in noise and Mandarin tones with acoustic simulations of harmonic coding for cochlear implants.
    Li X; Nie K; Imennov NS; Won JH; Drennan WR; Rubinstein JT; Atlas LE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Nov; 132(5):3387-98. PubMed ID: 23145619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of age and hearing loss on auditory stream segregation of speech sounds.
    David M; Tausend AN; Strelcyk O; Oxenham AJ
    Hear Res; 2018 Jul; 364():118-128. PubMed ID: 29602593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Distorting temporal fine structure by phase shifting and its effects on speech intelligibility and neural phase locking.
    Xu Y; Chen M; LaFaire P; Tan X; Richter CP
    Sci Rep; 2017 Oct; 7(1):13387. PubMed ID: 29042580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The relative importance of consonant and vowel segments to the recognition of words and sentences: effects of age and hearing loss.
    Fogerty D; Kewley-Port D; Humes LE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1667-78. PubMed ID: 22978895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The Importance of Acoustic Temporal Fine Structure Cues in Different Spectral Regions for Mandarin Sentence Recognition.
    Li B; Wang H; Yang G; Hou L; Su K; Feng Y; Yin S
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(1):e52-6. PubMed ID: 26317161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Perceptual integration of acoustic cues to laryngeal contrasts in Korean fricatives.
    Lee S; Katz J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Feb; 139(2):605-11. PubMed ID: 26936544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Spectrotemporal modulation sensitivity for hearing-impaired listeners: dependence on carrier center frequency and the relationship to speech intelligibility.
    Mehraei G; Gallun FJ; Leek MR; Bernstein JG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jul; 136(1):301-16. PubMed ID: 24993215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Acoustic and perceptual effects of amplitude and frequency compression on high-frequency speech.
    Alexander JM; Rallapalli V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Aug; 142(2):908. PubMed ID: 28863610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Suprathreshold auditory processing and speech perception in noise: hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.
    Summers V; Makashay MJ; Theodoroff SM; Leek MR
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):274-92. PubMed ID: 23636209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Voice emotion recognition by cochlear-implanted children and their normally-hearing peers.
    Chatterjee M; Zion DJ; Deroche ML; Burianek BA; Limb CJ; Goren AP; Kulkarni AM; Christensen JA
    Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():151-62. PubMed ID: 25448167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Perceptual weighting of individual and concurrent cues for sentence intelligibility: frequency, envelope, and fine structure.
    Fogerty D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Feb; 129(2):977-88. PubMed ID: 21361454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.