These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25237083)

  • 1. Science policy. Play it again, Uncle Sam.
    Mervis J
    Science; 2014 Sep; 345(6203):1442. PubMed ID: 25237083
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Budget numbers for US science looking up.
    Hand E; Wadman M
    Nature; 2009 Mar; 458(7234):18. PubMed ID: 19262638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. U.S. election. Old challenges, new faces await science community in 2013.
    Mervis J
    Science; 2012 Nov; 338(6109):874-5. PubMed ID: 23161966
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. U.S. Policy. Election stakes go beyond control of the Senate.
    Mervis J
    Science; 2014 Oct; 346(6208):408-9. PubMed ID: 25342779
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Double trouble? To throw cash at science is a mistake.
    Sarewitz D
    Nature; 2010 Nov; 468(7321):135. PubMed ID: 21068785
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Science policy. Group raises hackles as well as funds.
    Lawler A
    Science; 2001 Sep; 293(5536):1747-9. PubMed ID: 11546847
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. US science faces a squeeze.
    Monastersky R; Tollefson J; Wadman M; Samuel Reich E
    Nature; 2010 Nov; 468(7321):146-7. PubMed ID: 21068799
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Budget instructions.
    Goldston D
    Nature; 2009 Sep; 461(7260):25. PubMed ID: 19727178
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Republican spending plan casts shadow on science.
    Maxmen A
    Nature; 2012 Aug; 488(7412):441. PubMed ID: 22914144
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A vote for science.
    Nature; 2012 Oct; 490(7421):445. PubMed ID: 23099362
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Science should be ready to jump off 'the cliff'.
    Macilwain C
    Nature; 2012 Nov; 491(7426):639. PubMed ID: 23192107
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Science feels the pinch as Bush budget targets defence.
    Check E
    Nature; 2003 Feb; 421(6923):565. PubMed ID: 12571560
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Power shift stymies US science budget.
    Brumfiel G
    Nature; 2007 Jan; 445(7124):130-1. PubMed ID: 17215810
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. 2014 U.S. budget. Request would let science rebound from sequester.
    Mervis J
    Science; 2013 Apr; 340(6130):257. PubMed ID: 23599450
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. US science agencies dodge deep cuts.
    Semeniuk I
    Nature; 2011 Nov; 479(7374):455-6. PubMed ID: 22113668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A two-year plan for US science.
    Greenberg DS
    Nature; 2010 Oct; 467(7317):781-2. PubMed ID: 20944714
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Science's rightful place is in service of society.
    Sarewitz D
    Nature; 2013 Oct; 502(7473):595. PubMed ID: 24172942
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bush's belt-tightening budget offers science slim pickings.
    Brumfiel G
    Nature; 2004 Feb; 427(6974):475. PubMed ID: 14765158
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lean budget leaves scientists wanting more.
    Brumfiel G; Reichhardt T
    Nature; 2004 Nov; 432(7016):424. PubMed ID: 15565115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Budget blow to US science.
    Hand E
    Nature; 2008 Jan; 451(7174):2-3. PubMed ID: 18172462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.