These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25238339)

  • 1. Witnessing genuine multipartite entanglement with positive maps.
    Huber M; Sengupta R
    Phys Rev Lett; 2014 Sep; 113(10):100501. PubMed ID: 25238339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Certification of Genuine Multipartite Entanglement with General and Robust Device-Independent Witnesses.
    Zhang C; Zhang WH; Sekatski P; Bancal JD; Zwerger M; Yin P; Li GC; Peng XX; Chen L; Han YJ; Xu JS; Huang YF; Chen G; Li CF; Guo GC
    Phys Rev Lett; 2022 Nov; 129(19):190503. PubMed ID: 36399745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detection of high-dimensional genuine multipartite entanglement of mixed states.
    Huber M; Mintert F; Gabriel A; Hiesmayr BC
    Phys Rev Lett; 2010 May; 104(21):210501. PubMed ID: 20867080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genuine Multipartite Nonlocality Is Intrinsic to Quantum Networks.
    Contreras-Tejada P; Palazuelos C; de Vicente JI
    Phys Rev Lett; 2021 Jan; 126(4):040501. PubMed ID: 33576673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genuine Network Multipartite Entanglement.
    Navascués M; Wolfe E; Rosset D; Pozas-Kerstjens A
    Phys Rev Lett; 2020 Dec; 125(24):240505. PubMed ID: 33412021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Asymptotic Survival of Genuine Multipartite Entanglement in Noisy Quantum Networks Depends on the Topology.
    Contreras-Tejada P; Palazuelos C; de Vicente JI
    Phys Rev Lett; 2022 Jun; 128(22):220501. PubMed ID: 35714237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detecting genuine multipartite entanglement with two local measurements.
    Tóth G; Gühne O
    Phys Rev Lett; 2005 Feb; 94(6):060501. PubMed ID: 15783712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Detection and measure of genuine tripartite entanglement with partial transposition and realignment of density matrices.
    Li M; Wang J; Shen S; Chen Z; Fei SM
    Sci Rep; 2017 Dec; 7(1):17274. PubMed ID: 29222440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Device-independent witnesses of genuine multipartite entanglement.
    Bancal JD; Gisin N; Liang YC; Pironio S
    Phys Rev Lett; 2011 Jun; 106(25):250404. PubMed ID: 21770616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Experimental detection of multipartite entanglement using witness operators.
    Bourennane M; Eibl M; Kurtsiefer C; Gaertner S; Weinfurter H; Gühne O; Hyllus P; Bruss D; Lewenstein M; Sanpera A
    Phys Rev Lett; 2004 Feb; 92(8):087902. PubMed ID: 14995816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multipartite entanglement witnesses.
    Sperling J; Vogel W
    Phys Rev Lett; 2013 Sep; 111(11):110503. PubMed ID: 24074063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Detecting Entanglement in Quantum Many-Body Systems via Permutation Moments.
    Liu Z; Tang Y; Dai H; Liu P; Chen S; Ma X
    Phys Rev Lett; 2022 Dec; 129(26):260501. PubMed ID: 36608179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Strong monogamy of bipartite and genuine multipartite entanglement: the Gaussian case.
    Adesso G; Illuminati F
    Phys Rev Lett; 2007 Oct; 99(15):150501. PubMed ID: 17995148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Experimental entanglement redistribution under decoherence channels.
    Aguilar GH; Valdés-Hernández A; Davidovich L; Walborn SP; Souto Ribeiro PH
    Phys Rev Lett; 2014 Dec; 113(24):240501. PubMed ID: 25541759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ultrafine Entanglement Witnessing.
    Shahandeh F; Ringbauer M; Loredo JC; Ralph TC
    Phys Rev Lett; 2017 Mar; 118(11):110502. PubMed ID: 28368625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Witnessing Nonequilibrium Entanglement Dynamics in a Strongly Correlated Fermionic Chain.
    Baykusheva DR; Kalthoff MH; Hofmann D; Claassen M; Kennes DM; Sentef MA; Mitrano M
    Phys Rev Lett; 2023 Mar; 130(10):106902. PubMed ID: 36962013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Characterization of multipartite entanglement for one photon shared among four optical modes.
    Papp SB; Choi KS; Deng H; Lougovski P; van Enk SJ; Kimble HJ
    Science; 2009 May; 324(5928):764-8. PubMed ID: 19423821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Measurement-Device-Independent Entanglement Witness of Tripartite Entangled States and Its Applications.
    Li ZD; Zhao Q; Zhang R; Liu LZ; Yin XF; Zhang X; Fei YY; Chen K; Liu NL; Xu F; Chen YA; Li L; Pan JW
    Phys Rev Lett; 2020 Apr; 124(16):160503. PubMed ID: 32383895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. When Is a Genuine Multipartite Entanglement Measure Monogamous?
    Guo Y
    Entropy (Basel); 2022 Feb; 24(3):. PubMed ID: 35327866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. General monogamy relation for the entanglement of formation in multiqubit systems.
    Bai YK; Xu YF; Wang ZD
    Phys Rev Lett; 2014 Sep; 113(10):100503. PubMed ID: 25238341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.