These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
428 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25238804)
1. Does fluoroscopy improve acetabular component placement in total hip arthroplasty? Beamer BS; Morgan JH; Barr C; Weaver MJ; Vrahas MS Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Dec; 472(12):3953-62. PubMed ID: 25238804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Safe Zone Range for Cup Anteversion Is Narrower Than for Inclination in THA. Murphy WS; Yun HH; Hayden B; Kowal JH; Murphy SB Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Feb; 476(2):325-335. PubMed ID: 29529664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Does fluoroscopy with anterior hip arthroplasty decrease acetabular cup variability compared with a nonguided posterior approach? Rathod PA; Bhalla S; Deshmukh AJ; Rodriguez JA Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Jun; 472(6):1877-85. PubMed ID: 24549773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. What Safe Zone? The Vast Majority of Dislocated THAs Are Within the Lewinnek Safe Zone for Acetabular Component Position. Abdel MP; von Roth P; Jennings MT; Hanssen AD; Pagnano MW Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):386-91. PubMed ID: 26150264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intraoperative evaluation of acetabular cup position during anterior approach total hip arthroplasty: are we accurately interpreting? Delagrammaticas DE; Ochenjele G; Rosenthal BD; Assenmacher B; Manning DW; Stover MD Hip Int; 2020 Jan; 30(1):40-47. PubMed ID: 31387397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Acetabular component positioning using anatomic landmarks of the acetabulum. Ha YC; Yoo JJ; Lee YK; Kim JY; Koo KH Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2012 Dec; 470(12):3515-23. PubMed ID: 22777589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Acetabular Placement Accuracy With the Direct Anterior Approach Freehand Technique. Soderquist MC; Scully R; Unger AS J Arthroplasty; 2017 Sep; 32(9):2748-2754. PubMed ID: 28499624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of robotic-assisted and conventional acetabular cup placement in THA: a matched-pair controlled study. Domb BG; El Bitar YF; Sadik AY; Stake CE; Botser IB Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Jan; 472(1):329-36. PubMed ID: 23990446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Acetabular cup placement in navigated and non-navigated total hip arthroplasty (THA): results of two consecutive series using a cementless short stem. Suksathien Y; Suksathien R; Chaiwirattana P J Med Assoc Thai; 2014 Jun; 97(6):629-34. PubMed ID: 25137880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does Cup Position at the High Hip Center or Anatomic Hip Center in THA for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip Result in Better Harris Hip Scores and Revision Incidence? A Systematic Review. Stirling P; Viamont-Guerra MR; Strom L; Chen AF; Saffarini M; Nover L; Laude F Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 May; 479(5):1119-1130. PubMed ID: 33539054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Low Frequency of Early Complications With Dual-mobility Acetabular Cups in Cementless Primary THA. Chughtai M; Mistry JB; Diedrich AM; Jauregui JJ; Elmallah RK; Bonutti PM; Harwin SF; Malkani AL; Kolisek FR; Mont MA Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Oct; 474(10):2181-7. PubMed ID: 27106128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Adoption of Robotic vs Fluoroscopic Guidance in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Is Acetabular Positioning Improved in the Learning Curve? Kamara E; Robinson J; Bas MA; Rodriguez JA; Hepinstall MS J Arthroplasty; 2017 Jan; 32(1):125-130. PubMed ID: 27499519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. No Benefit After THA Performed With Computer-assisted Cup Placement: 10-year Results of a Randomized Controlled Study. Parratte S; Ollivier M; Lunebourg A; Flecher X; Argenson JN Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Oct; 474(10):2085-93. PubMed ID: 27150344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Comparison of Component Positioning Between Fluoroscopy-Assisted and Robotic-Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty. Stewart NJ; Stewart JL; Brisbin A J Arthroplasty; 2022 Aug; 37(8):1602-1605.e3. PubMed ID: 35314287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Three-Dimensional Planning-Assisted and Conventional Acetabular Cup Positioning in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Sariali E; Boukhelifa N; Catonne Y; Pascal Moussellard H J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Jan; 98(2):108-16. PubMed ID: 26791031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reconstruction of the Shallow Acetabulum With a Combination of Autologous Bulk and Impaction Bone Grafting Fixed by Cement. Maruyama M; Wakabayashi S; Ota H; Tensho K Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Feb; 475(2):387-395. PubMed ID: 27837399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Novel Acetabular Cup for Revision THA Improves Hip Center of Rotation: A Radiographic Evaluation. Khlopas A; Chughtai M; Elmallah RK; Hip-Flores D; Malkani AL; Harwin SF; Mont MA; Ries MD Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Feb; 476(2):315-322. PubMed ID: 29529662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does Intraoperative Fluoroscopy Optimize Limb Length and the Precision of Acetabular Positioning in Primary THA? Leucht P; Huddleston HG; Bellino MJ; Huddleston JI Orthopedics; 2015 May; 38(5):e380-6. PubMed ID: 25970364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does Intra-operative Fluoroscopy Significantly Improve Component Position in a Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty? Our Experience in a Tertiary Care Hospital. Shah M; Vieira A; Mahajan A; Agrawal L; Shah D; Surme S; Velankar A Indian J Orthop; 2023 Feb; 57(2):325-335. PubMed ID: 36777120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does a Commercially Available Augmented Reality-based Portable Hip Navigation System Improve Cup Positioning During THA Compared With the Conventional Technique? A Randomized Controlled Study. Tanino H; Mitsutake R; Takagi K; Ito H Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2024 Mar; 482(3):458-467. PubMed ID: 37650864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]