257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25238882)
1. Minithoracotomy for mitral valve repair improves inpatient and postdischarge economic savings.
Grossi EA; Goldman S; Wolfe JA; Mehall J; Smith JM; Ailawadi G; Salemi A; Moore M; Ward A; Gunnarsson C;
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Dec; 148(6):2818-22.e1-3. PubMed ID: 25238882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive versus traditional sternotomy mitral valve surgery in elderly patients.
Iribarne A; Easterwood R; Russo MJ; Chan EY; Smith CR; Argenziano M
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Apr; 143(4 Suppl):S86-90. PubMed ID: 22423605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Right anterior thoracotomy aortic valve replacement is associated with less cost than sternotomy-based approaches: a multi-institution analysis of 'real world' data.
Rodriguez E; Malaisrie SC; Mehall JR; Moore M; Salemi A; Ailawadi G; Gunnarsson C; Ward AF; Grossi EA;
J Med Econ; 2014 Dec; 17(12):846-52. PubMed ID: 25111633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery is associated with equivalent cost and shorter hospital stay when compared with traditional sternotomy.
Atluri P; Stetson RL; Hung G; Gaffey AC; Szeto WY; Acker MA; Hargrove WC
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2016 Feb; 151(2):385-8. PubMed ID: 26432722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Replacement: Cost-Benefit Analysis of Ministernotomy Versus Minithoracotomy Approach.
Hassan M; Miao Y; Maraey A; Lincoln J; Brown S; Windsor J; Ricci M
J Heart Valve Dis; 2015 Sep; 24(5):531-9. PubMed ID: 26897831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantifying the incremental cost of complications associated with mitral valve surgery in the United States.
Iribarne A; Burgener JD; Hong K; Raman J; Akhter S; Easterwood R; Jeevanandam V; Russo MJ
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Apr; 143(4):864-72. PubMed ID: 22424521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Less invasive versus conventional heart valve surgery in patients with severe heart failure.
Mihaljevic T; Planinc M; Williams SJ; Gillinov AM; Sabik JF; Svensson LG; Starling RC; Smedira NG; Blackstone EH
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Jul; 148(1):161-167.e6. PubMed ID: 24120125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement provides equivalent outcomes at reduced cost compared with conventional aortic valve replacement: A real-world multi-institutional analysis.
Ghanta RK; Lapar DJ; Kern JA; Kron IL; Speir AM; Fonner E; Quader M; Ailawadi G
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Apr; 149(4):1060-5. PubMed ID: 25680751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fifteen-year experience with minimally invasive approach for reoperations involving the mitral valve.
Arcidi JM; Rodriguez E; Elbeery JR; Nifong LW; Efird JT; Chitwood WR
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 May; 143(5):1062-8. PubMed ID: 21821266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mini-thoracotomy vs. conventional sternotomy mitral valve surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Al Otaibi A; Gupta S; Belley-Cote EP; Alsagheir A; Spence J; Parry D; Whitlock RP
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2017 Jun; 58(3):489-496. PubMed ID: 27588617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The minithoracotomy approach: a safe and effective alternative for heart valve surgery.
Mariscalco G; Musumeci F
Ann Thorac Surg; 2014 Jan; 97(1):356-64. PubMed ID: 24263013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Echocardiographic assessment of mitral durability in the late period following mitral valve repair: minithoracotomy versus conventional sternotomy.
Yoo JS; Kim JB; Jung SH; Choo SJ; Chung CH; Lee JW
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 May; 147(5):1547-52. PubMed ID: 23856209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Trends, clinical outcomes, and cost implications of mitral valve repair versus replacement, concomitant with aortic valve replacement.
Kilic A; Grimm JC; Magruder JT; Sciortino CM; Whitman GJ; Baumgartner WA; Conte JV
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Jun; 149(6):1614-9. PubMed ID: 26060006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Right anterior minithoracotomy versus conventional aortic valve replacement: a propensity score matched study.
Glauber M; Miceli A; Gilmanov D; Ferrarini M; Bevilacqua S; Farneti PA; Solinas M
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2013 May; 145(5):1222-6. PubMed ID: 22516391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost analysis of minimally invasive compared to conventional mitral valve surgery.
Verbrugghe P; De Praetere H; Meuris B; Rega F; Meyns B; Goodall G; Herijgers P
Acta Cardiol; 2016; 71(5):527-535. PubMed ID: 27695009
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Right anterior minithoracotomy versus median sternotomy surgery for native mitral valve infective endocarditis.
Mihos CG; Santana O; Pineda AM; Lamas GA; Lamelas J
J Heart Valve Dis; 2014 May; 23(3):343-9. PubMed ID: 25296460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mitral valve surgery: right lateral minithoracotomy or sternotomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Sündermann SH; Sromicki J; Rodriguez Cetina Biefer H; Seifert B; Holubec T; Falk V; Jacobs S
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Nov; 148(5):1989-1995.e4. PubMed ID: 24589199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quality of mitral valve repair: median sternotomy versus port-access approach.
Raanani E; Spiegelstein D; Sternik L; Preisman S; Moshkovitz Y; Smolinsky AK; Shinfeld A
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2010 Jul; 140(1):86-90. PubMed ID: 19969315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the PaO2/FiO2 ratio in sternotomy vs. thoracotomy in mitral valve repair: a randomised controlled trial.
Kang WS; Yoon TG; Kim TY; Kim SH
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2011 Nov; 28(11):807-12. PubMed ID: 21897262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Minimally invasive mitral repair: The cost is the same, but what is the price?
Vassileva CM
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2016 Feb; 151(2):389-90. PubMed ID: 26541832
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
