These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25239098)

  • 1. Labels affect both liking and preference: the better the stimuli, the bigger the preference.
    Zellner DA; Hoer K; Feldman J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Nov; 76(8):2189-92. PubMed ID: 25239098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Categorization reduces the effect of context on hedonic preference.
    Zellner DA; Mattingly MC; Parker S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Aug; 71(6):1228-32. PubMed ID: 19633338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Attractiveness difference magnitude affected by context, range, and categorization.
    Forsythe M; Zellner D; Cogan E; Parker S
    Perception; 2014; 43(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 24689132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hedonic contrast and condensation: good stimuli make mediocre stimuli less good and less different.
    Zellner DA; Allen D; Henley M; Parker S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Apr; 13(2):235-9. PubMed ID: 16892987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Increased hedonic differences despite increases in hedonic range.
    Zellner DA; Jones K; Morino J; Cogan ES; Jennings EM; Parker S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Jul; 72(5):1261-5. PubMed ID: 20601708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Still Eating Despite Decreased Olfactory Pleasure-The Influence of Odor Liking and Wanting on Food Intake.
    Sailer U; Triscoli C; Croy I
    Chem Senses; 2016 Jul; 41(6):497-504. PubMed ID: 26976121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Influence of Olfactory Contexts on the Sequential Rating of Odor Pleasantness.
    Nakano S; Ayabe-Kanamura S
    Perception; 2017; 46(3-4):393-405. PubMed ID: 27697912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What's that smell? An ecological approach to understanding preferences for familiar odors.
    Schloss KB; Goldberger CS; Palmer SE; Levitan CA
    Perception; 2015; 44(1):23-38. PubMed ID: 26489214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Differences in the central-nervous processing of olfactory stimuli according to their hedonic and arousal characteristics.
    Sorokowska A; Negoias S; Härtwig S; Gerber J; Iannilli E; Warr J; Hummel T
    Neuroscience; 2016 Jun; 324():62-8. PubMed ID: 26968764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Age differences in olfactory affective responses: evidence for a positivity effect and an emotional dedifferentiation.
    Vieillard S; Ronat L; Baccarani A; Schaal B; Baudouin JY; Brochard R
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2021 Jul; 28(4):570-583. PubMed ID: 32787505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Body odor attractiveness as a cue of impending ovulation in women: evidence from a study using hormone-confirmed ovulation.
    Gildersleeve KA; Haselton MG; Larson CM; Pillsworth EG
    Horm Behav; 2012 Feb; 61(2):157-66. PubMed ID: 22137971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Now you like me, now you don't: impact of labels on odor perception.
    Manescu S; Frasnelli J; Lepore F; Djordjevic J
    Chem Senses; 2014 Feb; 39(2):167-75. PubMed ID: 24336680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hedonic responses as predictors of food choice: flexibility and self-prediction.
    Mustonen S; Hissa I; Huotilainen A; Miettinen SM; Tuorila H
    Appetite; 2007 Jul; 49(1):159-68. PubMed ID: 17343956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Semantic context facilitates odor identification in children and adults.
    Goubet N; McCall DD; Ducz JK; Bingham ML
    Dev Psychobiol; 2014 Apr; 56(3):592-8. PubMed ID: 23775043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Olfactory modulation of affective touch processing - A neurophysiological investigation.
    Croy I; Drechsler E; Hamilton P; Hummel T; Olausson H
    Neuroimage; 2016 Jul; 135():135-41. PubMed ID: 27138206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Transitivity of odor preferences: constant and particularities in hedonic perception.
    Brand G; Haaz V; Jacquot L
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2012 Sep; 98(2):191-7. PubMed ID: 23008522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Auditory-olfactory integration: congruent or pleasant sounds amplify odor pleasantness.
    Seo HS; Hummel T
    Chem Senses; 2011 Mar; 36(3):301-9. PubMed ID: 21163913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Licking microstructure and hedonic changes after flavour preference learning in rats.
    Riordan JE; Dwyer DM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Dec; 72(12):2717-2725. PubMed ID: 31144575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Olfactory speed - Temporal odor processing of paired stimuli.
    Schriever VA; Frenzel C; Wernecke S; Croy I; Valder C; Hummel T
    Neuroscience; 2015 Jun; 295():72-9. PubMed ID: 25813706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the hedonic general Labeled Magnitude Scale with the hedonic 9-point scale.
    Kalva JJ; Sims CA; Puentes LA; Snyder DJ; Bartoshuk LM
    J Food Sci; 2014 Feb; 79(2):S238-45. PubMed ID: 24422940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.