These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

290 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25239205)

  • 1. Digital mammographic density and breast cancer risk: a case-control study of six alternative density assessment methods.
    Eng A; Gallant Z; Shepherd J; McCormack V; Li J; Dowsett M; Vinnicombe S; Allen S; dos-Santos-Silva I
    Breast Cancer Res; 2014 Sep; 16(5):439. PubMed ID: 25239205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Breast Cancer Risk and Mammographic Density Assessed with Semiautomated and Fully Automated Methods and BI-RADS.
    Jeffers AM; Sieh W; Lipson JA; Rothstein JH; McGuire V; Whittemore AS; Rubin DL
    Radiology; 2017 Feb; 282(2):348-355. PubMed ID: 27598536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of fully and semi-automated area-based methods for measuring mammographic density and predicting breast cancer risk.
    Sovio U; Li J; Aitken Z; Humphreys K; Czene K; Moss S; Hall P; McCormack V; dos-Santos-Silva I
    Br J Cancer; 2014 Apr; 110(7):1908-16. PubMed ID: 24556624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of type of full-field digital image on mammographic density assessment and breast cancer risk estimation: a case-control study.
    Busana MC; Eng A; Denholm R; Dowsett M; Vinnicombe S; Allen S; Dos-Santos-Silva I
    Breast Cancer Res; 2016 Sep; 18(1):96. PubMed ID: 27670914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of a fully automated, high-throughput mammographic density measurement tool for use with processed digital mammograms.
    Couwenberg AM; Verkooijen HM; Li J; Pijnappel RM; Charaghvandi KR; Hartman M; van Gils CH
    Cancer Causes Control; 2014 Aug; 25(8):1037-43. PubMed ID: 24962023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of percent density from raw and processed full-field digital mammography data.
    Vachon CM; Fowler EE; Tiffenberg G; Scott CG; Pankratz VS; Sellers TA; Heine JJ
    Breast Cancer Res; 2013 Jan; 15(1):R1. PubMed ID: 23289950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automated Volumetric Breast Density Measurements in the Era of the BI-RADS Fifth Edition: A Comparison With Visual Assessment.
    Youk JH; Gweon HM; Son EJ; Kim JA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 May; 206(5):1056-62. PubMed ID: 26934689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of Clinical and Automated Breast Density Measurements: Implications for Risk Prediction and Supplemental Screening.
    Brandt KR; Scott CG; Ma L; Mahmoudzadeh AP; Jensen MR; Whaley DH; Wu FF; Malkov S; Hruska CB; Norman AD; Heine J; Shepherd J; Pankratz VS; Kerlikowske K; Vachon CM
    Radiology; 2016 Jun; 279(3):710-9. PubMed ID: 26694052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of LIBRA Software for Fully Automated Mammographic Density Assessment in Breast Cancer Risk Prediction.
    Gastounioti A; Kasi CD; Scott CG; Brandt KR; Jensen MR; Hruska CB; Wu FF; Norman AD; Conant EF; Winham SJ; Kerlikowske K; Kontos D; Vachon CM
    Radiology; 2020 Jul; 296(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 32396041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of five methods of measuring mammographic density: a case-control study.
    Astley SM; Harkness EF; Sergeant JC; Warwick J; Stavrinos P; Warren R; Wilson M; Beetles U; Gadde S; Lim Y; Jain A; Bundred S; Barr N; Reece V; Brentnall AR; Cuzick J; Howell T; Evans DG
    Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Feb; 20(1):10. PubMed ID: 29402289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing within-woman changes in mammographic density: a comparison of fully versus semi-automated area-based approaches.
    Busana MC; De Stavola BL; Sovio U; Li J; Moss S; Humphreys K; dos-Santos-Silva I
    Cancer Causes Control; 2016 Apr; 27(4):481-91. PubMed ID: 26847236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of mammogram acquisition on the mammographic density and breast cancer association in the Mayo Mammography Health Study cohort.
    Olson JE; Sellers TA; Scott CG; Schueler BA; Brandt KR; Serie DJ; Jensen MR; Wu FF; Morton MJ; Heine JJ; Couch FJ; Pankratz VS; Vachon CM
    Breast Cancer Res; 2012 Nov; 14(6):R147. PubMed ID: 23152984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing Visually Assessed BI-RADS Breast Density and Automated Volumetric Breast Density Software: A Cross-Sectional Study in a Breast Cancer Screening Setting.
    van der Waal D; den Heeten GJ; Pijnappel RM; Schuur KH; Timmers JM; Verbeek AL; Broeders MJ
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0136667. PubMed ID: 26335569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Agreement of mammographic measures of volumetric breast density to MRI.
    Wang J; Azziz A; Fan B; Malkov S; Klifa C; Newitt D; Yitta S; Hylton N; Kerlikowske K; Shepherd JA
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(12):e81653. PubMed ID: 24324712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fully automated measurements of volumetric breast density adapted for BIRADS 5th edition: a comparison with visual assessment.
    Youk JH; Gweon HM; Son EJ; Eun NL; Kim JA
    Acta Radiol; 2021 Sep; 62(9):1148-1154. PubMed ID: 32910685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Preliminary evaluation of the publicly available Laboratory for Breast Radiodensity Assessment (LIBRA) software tool: comparison of fully automated area and volumetric density measures in a case-control study with digital mammography.
    Keller BM; Chen J; Daye D; Conant EF; Kontos D
    Breast Cancer Res; 2015 Aug; 17():117. PubMed ID: 26303303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Radiological assessment of breast density by visual classification (BI-RADS) compared to automated volumetric digital software (Quantra): implications for clinical practice.
    Regini E; Mariscotti G; Durando M; Ghione G; Luparia A; Campanino PP; Bianchi CC; Bergamasco L; Fonio P; Gandini G
    Radiol Med; 2014 Oct; 119(10):741-9. PubMed ID: 24610166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) breast composition descriptors: automated measurement development for full field digital mammography.
    Fowler EE; Sellers TA; Lu B; Heine JJ
    Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):113502. PubMed ID: 24320473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Case-control study of mammographic density and breast cancer risk using processed digital mammograms.
    Habel LA; Lipson JA; Achacoso N; Rothstein JH; Yaffe MJ; Liang RY; Acton L; McGuire V; Whittemore AS; Rubin DL; Sieh W
    Breast Cancer Res; 2016 May; 18(1):53. PubMed ID: 27209070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. AutoDensity: an automated method to measure mammographic breast density that predicts breast cancer risk and screening outcomes.
    Nickson C; Arzhaeva Y; Aitken Z; Elgindy T; Buckley M; Li M; English DR; Kavanagh AM
    Breast Cancer Res; 2013; 15(5):R80. PubMed ID: 24020331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.