These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

315 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25239205)

  • 21. Automated measurement of volumetric mammographic density: a tool for widespread breast cancer risk assessment.
    Brand JS; Czene K; Shepherd JA; Leifland K; Heddson B; Sundbom A; Eriksson M; Li J; Humphreys K; Hall P
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2014 Sep; 23(9):1764-72. PubMed ID: 25012995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Mammographic density defined by higher than conventional brightness threshold better predicts breast cancer risk for full-field digital mammograms.
    Nguyen TL; Aung YK; Evans CF; Yoon-Ho C; Jenkins MA; Sung J; Hopper JL; Song YM
    Breast Cancer Res; 2015 Nov; 17():142. PubMed ID: 26581435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Enhancement of mammographic density measures in breast cancer risk prediction.
    Cheddad A; Czene K; Shepherd JA; Li J; Hall P; Humphreys K
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2014 Jul; 23(7):1314-23. PubMed ID: 24722754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Examination of fully automated mammographic density measures using LIBRA and breast cancer risk in a cohort of 21,000 non-Hispanic white women.
    Habel LA; Alexeeff SE; Achacoso N; Arasu VA; Gastounioti A; Gerstley L; Klein RJ; Liang RY; Lipson JA; Mankowski W; Margolies LR; Rothstein JH; Rubin DL; Shen L; Sistig A; Song X; Villaseñor MA; Westley M; Whittemore AS; Yaffe MJ; Wang P; Kontos D; Sieh W
    Breast Cancer Res; 2023 Aug; 25(1):92. PubMed ID: 37544983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Mammographic texture resemblance generalizes as an independent risk factor for breast cancer.
    Nielsen M; Vachon CM; Scott CG; Chernoff K; Karemore G; Karssemeijer N; Lillholm M; Karsdal MA
    Breast Cancer Res; 2014 Apr; 16(2):R37. PubMed ID: 24713478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of mammographic density estimation by Volpara software with radiologists' visual assessment: analysis of clinical-radiologic factors affecting discrepancy between them.
    Lee HN; Sohn YM; Han KH
    Acta Radiol; 2015 Sep; 56(9):1061-8. PubMed ID: 25338836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Association of area- and volumetric-mammographic density and breast cancer risk in women of Asian descent: a case control study.
    Mariapun S; Ho WK; Eriksson M; Mohd Taib NA; Yip CH; Rahmat K; Hall P; Teo SH
    Breast Cancer Res; 2024 May; 26(1):79. PubMed ID: 38750574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Automated and Clinical Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Density Measures Predict Risk for Screen-Detected and Interval Cancers: A Case-Control Study.
    Kerlikowske K; Scott CG; Mahmoudzadeh AP; Ma L; Winham S; Jensen MR; Wu FF; Malkov S; Pankratz VS; Cummings SR; Shepherd JA; Brandt KR; Miglioretti DL; Vachon CM
    Ann Intern Med; 2018 Jun; 168(11):757-765. PubMed ID: 29710124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Automated Percentage of Breast Density Measurements for Full-field Digital Mammography Applications.
    Fowler EE; Vachon CM; Scott CG; Sellers TA; Heine JJ
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Aug; 21(8):958-70. PubMed ID: 25018067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A novel and fully automated mammographic texture analysis for risk prediction: results from two case-control studies.
    Wang C; Brentnall AR; Cuzick J; Harkness EF; Evans DG; Astley S
    Breast Cancer Res; 2017 Oct; 19(1):114. PubMed ID: 29047382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Inter-observer agreement according to three methods of evaluating mammographic density and parenchymal pattern in a case control study: impact on relative risk of breast cancer.
    Winkel RR; von Euler-Chelpin M; Nielsen M; Diao P; Nielsen MB; Uldall WY; Vejborg I
    BMC Cancer; 2015 Apr; 15():274. PubMed ID: 25884160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. High-throughput mammographic-density measurement: a tool for risk prediction of breast cancer.
    Li J; Szekely L; Eriksson L; Heddson B; Sundbom A; Czene K; Hall P; Humphreys K
    Breast Cancer Res; 2012 Jul; 14(4):R114. PubMed ID: 22846386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Pectoral muscle attenuation as a marker for breast cancer risk in full-field digital mammography.
    Cheddad A; Czene K; Hall P; Humphreys K
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2015 Jun; 24(6):985-91. PubMed ID: 25870223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Mammographic density and structural features can individually and jointly contribute to breast cancer risk assessment in mammography screening: a case-control study.
    Winkel RR; von Euler-Chelpin M; Nielsen M; Petersen K; Lillholm M; Nielsen MB; Lynge E; Uldall WY; Vejborg I
    BMC Cancer; 2016 Jul; 16():414. PubMed ID: 27387546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of the association between mammographic density and the risk of breast cancer using Quantra software and the BI-RADS classification.
    Wang JM; Zhao HG; Liu TT; Wang FY
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Nov; 99(46):e23112. PubMed ID: 33181680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Reproductive factors and mammographic density within the International Consortium of Mammographic Density: A cross-sectional study.
    O'Driscoll J; Burton A; Maskarinec G; Perez-Gomez B; Vachon C; Miao H; Lajous M; López-Ridaura R; Eliassen AH; Pereira A; Garmendia ML; Tamimi RM; Bertrand K; Kwong A; Ursin G; Lee E; Qureshi SA; Ma H; Vinnicombe S; Moss S; Allen S; Ndumia R; Vinayak S; Teo SH; Mariapun S; Fadzli F; Peplonska B; Nagata C; Stone J; Hopper JL; Giles G; Ozmen V; Aribal ME; Schüz J; Van Gils CH; Wanders JOP; Sirous R; Sirous M; Hipwell J; Kim J; Lee JW; Hartman M; Li J; Scott C; Chiarelli AM; Linton L; Pollan M; Flugelman AA; Salem D; Kamal R; Boyd N; Dos-Santos-Silva I; McCormack V; Mullooly M
    Breast Cancer Res; 2024 Sep; 26(1):139. PubMed ID: 39350230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Mammographic density and breast cancer risk in breast screening assessment cases and women with a family history of breast cancer.
    Duffy SW; Morrish OWE; Allgood PC; Black R; Gillan MGC; Willsher P; Cooke J; Duncan KA; Michell MJ; Dobson HM; Maroni R; Lim YY; Purushothaman HN; Suaris T; Astley SM; Young KC; Tucker L; Gilbert FJ
    Eur J Cancer; 2018 Jan; 88():48-56. PubMed ID: 29190506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Quantra™ should be considered a tool for two-grade scale mammographic breast density classification.
    Ekpo EU; McEntee MF; Rickard M; Brennan PC; Kunduri J; Demchig D; Mello-Thoms C
    Br J Radiol; 2016; 89(1060):20151057. PubMed ID: 26882045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. An automated approach for estimation of breast density.
    Heine JJ; Carston MJ; Scott CG; Brandt KR; Wu FF; Pankratz VS; Sellers TA; Vachon CM
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2008 Nov; 17(11):3090-7. PubMed ID: 18990749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of Visual Assessment of Breast Density in BI-RADS 4th and 5th Editions With Automated Volumetric Measurement.
    Youk JH; Kim SJ; Son EJ; Gweon HM; Kim JA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Sep; 209(3):703-708. PubMed ID: 28657850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.