These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2523968)

  • 1. The retention of threaded pins in composite resin.
    Podshadley AG
    J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Feb; 61(2):169-73. PubMed ID: 2523968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Retention of threaded pins in amalgam.
    Podshadley AG
    J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Jan; 63(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 2404107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fracture resistance of pin-retained amalgam, composite resin, and alloy-reinforced glass ionomer core materials.
    Kao EC
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Oct; 66(4):463-71. PubMed ID: 1838771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The retention of amalgam and composite resin by a smooth, reverse-tapered pin.
    Brackett WW; Bailey JH
    Oper Dent; 1992; 17(4):152-5. PubMed ID: 1287596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retention of composite restorations. A comparison between a threaded pin and a dentine bonding agent.
    Butchart DG; Grieve AR; Kamel JH
    Br Dent J; 1988 Sep; 165(6):217-9. PubMed ID: 3066386
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fracture resistance of composite and amalgam cores retained by pins coated with new adhesive resins.
    Tjan AH; Dunn JR; Grant BE
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Jun; 67(6):752-60. PubMed ID: 1403855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of pin-retained amalgam and composite resin cores.
    Fujimoto J; Norman RD; Dykema RW; Phillips RW
    J Prosthet Dent; 1978 May; 39(5):512-9. PubMed ID: 349141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The use of resin composite pins to improve retention of Class IV resin composite restorations.
    Roberts HW; Hermesch CB; Charlton DG
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):270-3. PubMed ID: 11203830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interface strength of incremental placement of visible light-cured composites.
    Podshadley AG; Gullett CE; Binkley TK
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1985 Jun; 110(6):932-4. PubMed ID: 3160754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A clinical comparison of three anterior restorative resins at 3 years.
    Davis RD; Mayhew RB
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1986 May; 112(5):659-63. PubMed ID: 2940280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bonding amalgam to dentin by different methods.
    Hadavi F; Hey JH; Strasdin RB; McMeekin GP
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Sep; 72(3):250-4. PubMed ID: 7965897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Retentiveness of enamel-resin bonds using unfilled and filled resins.
    Hormati AA; Denehy GE; Fuller JL
    J Prosthet Dent; 1982 May; 47(5):502-4. PubMed ID: 6211542
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Retention of prefabricated posts with dental adhesive and composite.
    Ben-Amar A; Gontar G; Fitzig S; Urstein M; Liberman R
    J Prosthet Dent; 1986 Dec; 56(6):681-4. PubMed ID: 3534237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of resin composite pins on the retention of class IV restorations.
    Muhlbauer JA; Dunn WJ; Roberts HW; Murchison DF
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(3):284-8. PubMed ID: 12022461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of surface treatments on microtensile bond strength of repaired aged silorane resin composite.
    Palasuk J; Platt JA; Cho SD; Levon JA; Brown DT; Hovijitra ST
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(1):91-9. PubMed ID: 22830537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of an air-powder abrasive instrument on composite resin.
    Cooley RL; Lubow RM; Patrissi GA
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1986 Mar; 112(3):362-4. PubMed ID: 2937824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Resistance of composite and amalgam core foundations retained with and without pins and bonding agents.
    Imbery TA; Swigert R; Richman B; Sawicki V; Pace L; Moon PC
    Gen Dent; 2010; 58(2):130-7; quiz 138-9. PubMed ID: 20236921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tensile bond force of glass ionomer cements in direct bonding of orthodontic brackets: an in vitro comparative study.
    Rezk-Lega F; Ogaard B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1991 Oct; 100(4):357-61. PubMed ID: 1833971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of surface treatment of titanium posts on the tensile bond strength.
    Schmage P; Sohn J; Ozcan M; Nergiz I
    Dent Mater; 2006 Feb; 22(2):189-94. PubMed ID: 16039707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Marginal leakage of a microfilled composite resin.
    Hembree JH
    Ark Dent J; 1982 Sep; 53(3):18-9. PubMed ID: 6218797
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.