154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25239789)
1. Intra-individual comparison of magnesium citrate and sodium phosphate for bowel preparation at CT colonography: automated volumetric analysis of residual fluid for quality assessment.
Bannas P; Bakke J; Munoz del Rio A; Pickhardt PJ
Clin Radiol; 2014 Nov; 69(11):1171-7. PubMed ID: 25239789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bowel preparation for CT colonography: blinded comparison of magnesium citrate and sodium phosphate for catharsis.
Borden ZS; Pickhardt PJ; Kim DH; Lubner MG; Agriantonis DJ; Hinshaw JL
Radiology; 2010 Jan; 254(1):138-44. PubMed ID: 20032148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Automated volumetric analysis for comparison of oral sulfate solution (SUPREP) with established cathartic agents at CT colonography.
Bannas P; Bakke J; Patrick JL; Pickhardt PJ
Abdom Imaging; 2015 Jan; 40(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 24965898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. CT colonography after incomplete optical colonoscopy: bowel preparation quality at same-day vs. deferred examination.
Theis J; Kim DH; Lubner MG; Muñoz del Rio A; Pickhardt PJ
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2016 Jan; 41(1):10-8. PubMed ID: 26830606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reduced cathartic bowel preparation for CT colonography: prospective comparison of 2-L polyethylene glycol and magnesium citrate.
Keedy AW; Yee J; Aslam R; Weinstein S; Landeras LA; Shah JN; McQuaid KR; Yeh BM
Radiology; 2011 Oct; 261(1):156-64. PubMed ID: 21873253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Objective and Subjective Intrapatient Comparison of Iohexol Versus Diatrizoate for Bowel Preparation Quality at CT Colonography.
Johnson B; Hinshaw JL; Robbins JB; Pickhardt PJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Jun; 206(6):1202-7. PubMed ID: 27010251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of MiraLAX and magnesium citrate for bowel preparation at CT colonography.
Zacharias N; Lubner MG; Kim DH; Pickhardt PJ
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2023 Nov; 48(11):3322-3331. PubMed ID: 37644134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison study of different bowel preparation regimens and different fecal-tagging agents on tagging efficacy, patients' compliance, and diagnostic performance of computed tomographic colonography: preliminary study.
Yoon SH; Kim SH; Kim SG; Kim SJ; Lee JM; Lee JY; Han JK; Choi BI
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(5):657-65. PubMed ID: 19820488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of routine and unprepped CT colonography augmented by low fiber diet and stool tagging: a pilot study.
Dachman AH; Dawson DO; Lefere P; Yoshida H; Khan NU; Cipriani N; Rubin DT
Abdom Imaging; 2007; 32(1):96-104. PubMed ID: 16969601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. National CT colonography trial (ACRIN 6664): comparison of three full-laxative bowel preparations in more than 2500 average-risk patients.
Hara AK; Kuo MD; Blevins M; Chen MH; Yee J; Dachman A; Menias CO; Siewert B; Cheema JI; Obregon RG; Fidler JL; Zimmerman P; Horton KM; Coakley K; Iyer RB; Halvorsen RA; Casola G; Johnson CD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 May; 196(5):1076-82. PubMed ID: 21512073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. CT colonography: optimisation, diagnostic performance and patient acceptability of reduced-laxative regimens using barium-based faecal tagging.
Taylor SA; Slater A; Burling DN; Tam E; Greenhalgh R; Gartner L; Scarth J; Pearce R; Bassett P; Halligan S
Eur Radiol; 2008 Jan; 18(1):32-42. PubMed ID: 17404739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Use of Mechanical Bowel Preparation in Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Adelowo AO; Hacker MR; Modest AM; Apostolis CA; Disciullo AJ; Hanaway KJ; Elkadry EE; Rosenblatt PL; Rogers KJ; Hota LS
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2017; 23(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 27782976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Low-volume oral colonoscopy bowel preparation: sodium phosphate and magnesium citrate.
Berkelhammer C; Ekambaram A; Silva RG
Gastrointest Endosc; 2002 Jul; 56(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 12085041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate: a review of its use as a colorectal cleanser.
Hoy SM; Scott LJ; Wagstaff AJ
Drugs; 2009; 69(1):123-36. PubMed ID: 19192941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Low-volume hybrid bowel preparation combining saline laxatives with oral contrast agents versus standard polyethylene glycol lavage for colonoscopy.
Lawrence EM; Pickhardt PJ
Dis Colon Rectum; 2010 Aug; 53(8):1176-81. PubMed ID: 20628282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An interview study analysing patients' experiences and perceptions of non-laxative or full-laxative preparation with faecal tagging prior to CT colonography.
Ghanouni A; Smith SG; Halligan S; Taylor SA; Plumb A; Boone D; von Wagner C
Clin Radiol; 2013 May; 68(5):472-8. PubMed ID: 23265916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fluid tagging for CT colonography: effectiveness of a 2-hour iodinated oral preparation after incomplete optical colonoscopy.
Chang KJ; Rekhi SS; Anderson SW; Soto JA
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2011; 35(1):91-5. PubMed ID: 21160430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Iohexol versus diatrizoate for fecal/fluid tagging during CT colonography performed with cathartic preparation: comparison of examination quality.
Kim B; Park SH; Hong GS; Lee JH; Lee JS; Kim HJ; Kim AY; Ha HK
Eur Radiol; 2015 Jun; 25(6):1561-9. PubMed ID: 25576229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A randomized controlled trial of four precolonoscopy bowel cleansing regimens.
Kao D; Lalor E; Sandha G; Fedorak RN; van der Knoop B; Doornweerd S; van Kooten H; Schreuders E; Midodzi W; Veldhuyzen van Zanten S
Can J Gastroenterol; 2011 Dec; 25(12):657-62. PubMed ID: 22175055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Phase II Randomized Controlled Trial of Combined Oral laxatives Medication for BOwel PREParation (COMBO-PREP study).
Kim MJ; Hong CW; Kim BC; Park SC; Han KS; Joo J; Oh JH; Sohn DK
Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Feb; 95(7):e2824. PubMed ID: 26886637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
