These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25240209)

  • 1. Familiarity and categorization processes in memory search.
    Nosofsky RM; Cao R; Cox GE; Shiffrin RM
    Cogn Psychol; 2014 Dec; 75():97-129. PubMed ID: 25240209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An exemplar-familiarity model predicts short-term and long-term probe recognition across diverse forms of memory search.
    Nosofsky RM; Cox GE; Cao R; Shiffrin RM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Nov; 40(6):1524-39. PubMed ID: 24749963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Item frequency in probe-recognition memory search: Converging evidence for a role of item-response learning.
    Cao R; Shiffrin RM; Nosofsky RM
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Apr; 46(3):450-463. PubMed ID: 29264863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. You look familiar, but I don't care: Lure rejection in hybrid visual and memory search is not based on familiarity.
    Wolfe JM; Boettcher SE; Josephs EL; Cunningham CA; Drew T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Dec; 41(6):1576-87. PubMed ID: 26191615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The development of automaticity in short-term memory search: Item-response learning and category learning.
    Cao R; Nosofsky RM; Shiffrin RM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 May; 43(5):669-679. PubMed ID: 27929327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A power-law model of psychological memory strength in short- and long-term recognition.
    Donkin C; Nosofsky RM
    Psychol Sci; 2012 Jun; 23(6):625-34. PubMed ID: 22527527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. ERP evidence for flexible adjustment of retrieval orientation and its influence on familiarity.
    Ecker UK; Zimmer HD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Oct; 21(10):1907-19. PubMed ID: 18823244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Speeded old-new recognition of multidimensional perceptual stimuli: modeling performance at the individual-participant and individual-item levels.
    Nosofsky RM; Stanton RD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Apr; 32(2):314-34. PubMed ID: 16634673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modeling short- and long-term memory contributions to recent event recognition.
    Nosofsky RM; Cao R; Harding SM; Shiffrin RM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Feb; 47(2):316-342. PubMed ID: 32105142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Remembered but unused: the accessory items in working memory that do not guide attention.
    Peters JC; Goebel R; Roelfsema PR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 21(6):1081-91. PubMed ID: 18702589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Conceptual priming and familiarity: different expressions of memory during recognition testing with distinct neurophysiological correlates.
    Voss JL; Lucas HD; Paller KA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Nov; 22(11):2638-51. PubMed ID: 19702474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Short-term memory scanning viewed as exemplar-based categorization.
    Nosofsky RM; Little DR; Donkin C; Fific M
    Psychol Rev; 2011 Apr; 118(2):280-315. PubMed ID: 21355662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cognitive mechanisms of false facial recognition in older adults.
    Edmonds EC; Glisky EL; Bartlett JC; Rapcsak SZ
    Psychol Aging; 2012 Mar; 27(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 21787088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recall-to-reject: The effect of category cues on false recognition.
    Schmid J; Herholz SC; Brandt M; Buchner A
    Memory; 2010 Nov; 18(8):863-82. PubMed ID: 21108106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Categorization and recognition performance of a memory-impaired group: evidence for single-system models.
    Zaki SR; Nosofsky RM; Jessup NM; Unverzagt FW
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2003 Mar; 9(3):394-406. PubMed ID: 12666764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automatization and training in visual search.
    Czerwinski M; Lightfoot N; Shiffrin RM
    Am J Psychol; 1992; 105(2):271-315. PubMed ID: 1621883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual-memory search: an integrative perspective.
    Cousineau D; Larochelle S
    Psychol Res; 2004 Dec; 69(1-2):77-105. PubMed ID: 14986138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Memory storage and retrieval processes in category learning.
    Estes WK
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1986 Jun; 115(2):155-74. PubMed ID: 2940314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Response-time evidence for mixed memory states in a sequential-presentation change-detection task.
    Nosofsky RM; Donkin C
    Cogn Psychol; 2016 Feb; 84():31-62. PubMed ID: 26706291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of familiarity in item recognition, associative recognition, and plurality recognition on self-paced and speeded tests.
    Westerman DL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 May; 27(3):723-32. PubMed ID: 11394676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.