235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25240404)
1. Rethinking the therapeutic misconception: social justice, patient advocacy, and cancer clinical trial recruitment in the US safety net.
Burke NJ
BMC Med Ethics; 2014 Sep; 15():68. PubMed ID: 25240404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Procedures of recruiting, obtaining informed consent, and compensating research participants in Qatar: findings from a qualitative investigation.
Killawi A; Khidir A; Elnashar M; Abdelrahim H; Hammoud M; Elliott H; Thurston M; Asad H; Al-Khal AL; Fetters MD
BMC Med Ethics; 2014 Feb; 15():9. PubMed ID: 24495499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accessing health services through the back door: a qualitative interview study investigating reasons why people participate in health research in Canada.
Townsend A; Cox SM
BMC Med Ethics; 2013 Oct; 14():40. PubMed ID: 24119203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Phase 3 Oncology Clinical Trials in South Africa: Experimentation or Therapeutic Misconception?
Malan T; Moodley K
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2016 Feb; 11(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 27106890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Gatekeeping in cancer clinical trials in Canada: The ethics of recruiting the "ideal" patient.
Bell JAH; Kelly MT; Gelmon K; Chi K; Ho A; Rodney P; Balneaves LG
Cancer Med; 2020 Jun; 9(12):4107-4113. PubMed ID: 32314549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Informed Consent, Therapeutic Misconception, and Unrealistic Optimism.
Jansen LA
Perspect Biol Med; 2020; 63(2):359-373. PubMed ID: 33416658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. "I passed the test!" Evidence of diagnostic misconception in the recruitment of population controls for an H3Africa genomic study in Cape Town, South Africa.
Masiye F; Mayosi B; de Vries J
BMC Med Ethics; 2017 Feb; 18(1):12. PubMed ID: 28202021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Power Difference and Risk Perception: Mapping Vulnerability within the Decision Process of Pregnant Women towards Clinical Trial Participation in an Urban Middle-Income Setting.
Den Hollander GC; Browne JL; Arhinful D; van der Graaf R; Klipstein-Grobusch K
Dev World Bioeth; 2018 Jun; 18(2):68-75. PubMed ID: 27761986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Unrealistic optimism and the ethics of phase I cancer research.
Crites J; Kodish E
J Med Ethics; 2013 Jun; 39(6):403-6. PubMed ID: 23118468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Presuming patient autonomy in the face of therapeutic misconception.
McConville P
Bioethics; 2017 Nov; 31(9):711-715. PubMed ID: 28857220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Informed Consent in Two Alzheimer's Disease Research Centers: Insights From Research Coordinators.
Suver CM; Hamann JK; Chin EM; Goldstein FC; Blazel HM; Manzanares CM; Doerr MJ; Asthana SJ; Mangravite LM; Levey AI; Lah JJ; Edwards DF
AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2020; 11(2):114-124. PubMed ID: 32175821
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Ethical issues in research involving minority populations: the process and outcomes of protocol review by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Thailand.
Adams P; Wongwit W; Pengsaa K; Khusmith S; Fungladda W; Chaiyaphan W; Limphattharacharoen C; Prakobtham S; Kaewkungwal J
BMC Med Ethics; 2013 Sep; 14():33. PubMed ID: 24025591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Why take part in personalised cancer research? Patients' genetic misconception, genetic responsibility and incomprehension of stratification-an empirical-ethical examination.
Perry J; Wöhlke S; Heßling AC; Schicktanz S
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2017 Sep; 26(5):. PubMed ID: 27507437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dealing with Misconception in Biomedical Research.
Perry J; Wöhlke S
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2019 Dec; 14(5):428-432. PubMed ID: 31779559
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Therapeutic appropriation: a new concept in the ethics of clinical research.
McDougall R; Martin D; Gillam L; Hallowell N; Brookes A; Guillemin M
J Med Ethics; 2016 Dec; 42(12):805-808. PubMed ID: 27733438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reassessing the measurement and presence of therapeutic misconception in a phase 1 setting.
Abernethy ER; Campbell GP; Hianik RS; Thomson MC; Blee SM; Sibold HC; Dixon MD; Switchenko JM; Pentz RD
Cancer; 2021 Oct; 127(20):3794-3800. PubMed ID: 34161615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Why is therapeutic misconception so prevalent?
Lidz CW; Albert K; Appelbaum P; Dunn LB; Overton E; Pivovarova E
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2015 Apr; 24(2):231-41. PubMed ID: 25719358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Additional thoughts on rethinking research ethics.
Sharp RR; Yarborough M
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):40-2; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036657
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Therapeutic Misconception, Misestimation and COVID-19 Research.
Dehority W
Narrat Inq Bioeth; 2021; 11(1):61-63. PubMed ID: 34334470
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Application of the rapid ethical assessment approach to enhance the ethical conduct of longitudinal population based female cancer research in an urban setting in Ethiopia.
Gebremariam A; Yalew AW; Hirpa S; Wondimagegnehu A; Kaba M; Assefa M; Mitiku I; Kantelhardt EJ; Jemal A; Addissie A
BMC Med Ethics; 2018 Nov; 19(1):87. PubMed ID: 30428895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
