162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25240777)
1. Pentacam vs SP3000P specular microscopy in measuring corneal thickness.
De Bernardo M; Borrelli M; Mariniello M; Lanza M; Rosa N
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2015 Feb; 38(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 25240777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Measurement of corneal thickness using Pentacam HR versus Nidek CEM-530 specular microscopy.
De Bernardo M; Cornetta P; Marotta G; Salerno G; De Pascale I; Rosa N
J Int Med Res; 2020 Apr; 48(4):300060519892385. PubMed ID: 31878803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of central corneal thickness, thinnest corneal thickness, anterior chamber depth, and simulated keratometry using galilei, Pentacam, and Sirius devices.
Anayol MA; Güler E; Yağci R; Şekeroğlu MA; Ylmazoğlu M; Trhş H; Kulak AE; Ylmazbaş P
Cornea; 2014 Jun; 33(6):582-6. PubMed ID: 24763122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Agreement between Corneal Thickness Measurements Using Pentacam Scheimpflug Camera, Noncontact Specular Microscopy, and Ultrasonographic Pachymetry in Diabetic Patients.
Altay Y; Balta O; Demirok G; Burcu A; Balta OB; Ornek F
Curr Eye Res; 2017 Feb; 42(2):187-194. PubMed ID: 27348734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Investigation of the human anterior segment in normal Chinese subjects using a dual Scheimpflug analyzer.
Wang X; Wu Q
Ophthalmology; 2013 Apr; 120(4):703-8. PubMed ID: 23260258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Corneal thickness measurement using Orbscan, Pentacam, Galilei, and ultrasound in normal and post-femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis eyes.
Park SH; Choi SK; Lee D; Jun EJ; Kim JH
Cornea; 2012 Sep; 31(9):978-82. PubMed ID: 22699561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Corneal thickness evaluation in healthy eyes: Comparison between two different Scheimpflug devices.
Rosa N; De Bernardo M; Pepe A; Vitiello L; Marotta G; Imparato R; Capasso L
PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0243370. PubMed ID: 33270786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of corneal thickness measurements using Galilei, HR Pentacam, and ultrasound.
Jahadi Hosseini HR; Katbab A; Khalili MR; Abtahi MB
Cornea; 2010 Oct; 29(10):1091-5. PubMed ID: 20628301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Central corneal thickness measurements with different imaging devices and ultrasound pachymetry.
Tai LY; Khaw KW; Ng CM; Subrayan V
Cornea; 2013 Jun; 32(6):766-71. PubMed ID: 23095499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of corneal thickness measurement with the Pentacam, the PARK1 and an ultrasonic pachymeter.
Hashemi H; Jafarzadehpur E; Mehravaran S; Rezvan F; Bigdeli S
Clin Exp Optom; 2011 Sep; 94(5):433-7. PubMed ID: 21255079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison and repeatability of keratometric and corneal power measurements obtained by Orbscan II, Pentacam, and Galilei corneal tomography systems.
Crawford AZ; Patel DV; McGhee CN
Am J Ophthalmol; 2013 Jul; 156(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 23540708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Differential precision of corneal Pentacam HR measurements in early and advanced keratoconus.
Flynn TH; Sharma DP; Bunce C; Wilkins MR
Br J Ophthalmol; 2016 Sep; 100(9):1183-7. PubMed ID: 26659714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pentacam pachometry: comparison with non-contact specular microscopy on the central cornea and inter-session repeatability on the peripheral cornea.
Lam A; Chen D
Clin Exp Optom; 2007 Mar; 90(2):108-14. PubMed ID: 17311572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Measurement of central corneal thickness in myopic eyes with ultrasound and Pentacam scheimpflug system].
He YL; Li XX; Bao YZ; Liu GD; Hu YW
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Nov; 42(11):985-8. PubMed ID: 17386135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Reproducibility of Scheimpflug Tomography Measurements Regarding Corneal Front and Back Surface Power].
Stavridis E; Eppig T; Szentmáry N; Seitz B; Langenbucher A
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2015 Nov; 232(11):1297-303. PubMed ID: 26575536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Repeatability of Pentacam peripheral corneal thickness measurements.
Martin R; Jonuscheit S; Rio-Cristobal A; Doughty MJ
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2015 Dec; 38(6):424-9. PubMed ID: 26072988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Comparison between Scheimpflug imaging and optical coherence tomography in measuring corneal thickness.
Huang J; Ding X; Savini G; Pan C; Feng Y; Cheng D; Hua Y; Hu X; Wang Q
Ophthalmology; 2013 Oct; 120(10):1951-8. PubMed ID: 23672973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Correlation of central and peripheral corneal thickness in healthy corneas.
Fares U; Otri AM; Al-Aqaba MA; Dua HS
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2012 Feb; 35(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 21885326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Central and peripheral pachymetry measurements according to age using the Pentacam rotating Scheimpflug camera.
Khoramnia R; Rabsilber TM; Auffarth GU
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 May; 33(5):830-6. PubMed ID: 17466857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Repeatability of topographic corneal thickness in keratoconus comparing Visante™ OCT and Oculus Pentacam HR
Otchere H; Sorbara L
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2017 Aug; 40(4):217-223. PubMed ID: 28501441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
