163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25240777)
21. Central corneal thickness evaluation in healthy eyes with three different optical devices.
Lanza M; Paolillo E; Gironi Carnevale UA; Lanza A; Irregolare C; Mele L; Bifani M
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2015 Dec; 38(6):409-13. PubMed ID: 26048662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Corneal thickness measurements in normal and keratoconic eyes: Pentacam comprehensive eye scanner versus noncontact specular microscopy and ultrasound pachymetry.
Uçakhan OO; Ozkan M; Kanpolat A
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Jun; 32(6):970-7. PubMed ID: 16814055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of central corneal thickness in healthy eyes using ultrasound pachymetry, non-contact specular microscopy and a high-resolution Scheimpflug camera.
Soulantzou K; Plakitsi A; Chalkiadaki E; Anastasopoulou M; Karmiris E
Int Ophthalmol; 2023 Feb; 43(2):363-370. PubMed ID: 35864284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effect of post crosslinking haze on the repeatability of Scheimpflug-based and slit-scanning imaging devices.
Shetty R; Agrawal A; Deshmukh R; Kaweri L; Rao HL; Nagaraja H; Jayadev C
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2017 Apr; 65(4):305-310. PubMed ID: 28513495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Central and peripheral corneal pachymetry--standard evaluation with the Pentacam system].
Rüfer F; Schröder A; Arvani MK; Erb C
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2005 Feb; 222(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 15719315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of Pentacam and Orbscan IIz on posterior curvature topography measurements in keratoconus eyes.
Quisling S; Sjoberg S; Zimmerman B; Goins K; Sutphin J
Ophthalmology; 2006 Sep; 113(9):1629-32. PubMed ID: 16949447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Normative Pentacam anterior and posterior corneal elevation measurements: effects of age, sex, axial length and white-to-white.
Almorín-Fernández-Vigo I; Sánchez-Guillén I; Fernández-Vigo JI; Macarro-Merino A; Kudsieh B; Fernández-Vigo C; Fernández-Vigo JA
Int Ophthalmol; 2019 Sep; 39(9):1955-1963. PubMed ID: 30276510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Evaluation of corneal deformation analyzed with a Scheimpflug based device.
Lanza M; Cennamo M; Iaccarino S; Romano V; Bifani M; Irregolare C; Lanza A
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2015 Apr; 38(2):89-93. PubMed ID: 25467289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Repeatability of corneal thickness measured using an Oculus Pentacam.
Miranda MA; Radhakrishnan H; O'Donnell C
Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Mar; 86(3):266-72. PubMed ID: 19214132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Precision of a new Scheimpflug and Placido-disk analyzer in measuring corneal thickness and agreement with ultrasound pachymetry.
Huang J; Savini G; Hu L; Hoffer KJ; Lu W; Feng Y; Yang F; Hu X; Wang Q
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Feb; 39(2):219-24. PubMed ID: 23218819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with a rotating scheimpflug camera, a specular microscope, optical low-coherence reflectometry, and ultrasound pachymetry in keratoconic eyes.
Cinar Y; Cingu AK; Turkcu FM; Cinar T; Sahin A; Yuksel H; Ari S
Semin Ophthalmol; 2015 Mar; 30(2):105-11. PubMed ID: 24171806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Intraocular lens power calculations using a Scheimpflug camera to measure corneal power.
Xu K; Hao Y; Qi H
Biotech Histochem; 2014 Jul; 89(5):348-54. PubMed ID: 24359337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Reproducibility and repeatability of central corneal thickness measurement in healthy eyes using four different optical devices.
Karadag R; Unluzeybek M; Cakici O; Kanra AY; Bayramlar H
Int Ophthalmol; 2017 Aug; 37(4):1039-1045. PubMed ID: 27723007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Central corneal thickness measurement with Pentacam, Orbscan II, and ultrasound devices before and after laser refractive surgery for myopia.
Hashemi H; Mehravaran S
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Oct; 33(10):1701-7. PubMed ID: 17889763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of corneal thickness in patients with dry eye disease using the Pentacam rotating Scheimpflug camera and anterior segment optical coherence tomography.
Fujimoto K; Inomata T; Okumura Y; Iwata N; Fujio K; Eguchi A; Nagino K; Shokirova H; Karasawa M; Murakami A
PLoS One; 2020; 15(2):e0228567. PubMed ID: 32012201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Repeatability and reproducibility of Galilei measurements in normal keratoconic and postrefractive corneas.
Güler E; Yağci R; Akyol M; Arslanyılmaz Z; Balci M; Hepşen IF
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2014 Oct; 37(5):331-6. PubMed ID: 24938125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of central corneal thickness measured with Orbscan and Pentacam.
Rosa N; Lanza M; Borrelli M; Polito B; Filosa ML; De Bernardo M
J Refract Surg; 2007 Nov; 23(9):895-9. PubMed ID: 18041242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Topographic paracentral corneal thickness with pentacam and orbscan: effect of acoustic factor.
González-Pérez J; González-Méijome JM; Rodríguez Ares MT; Parafita MA
Eye Contact Lens; 2011 Nov; 37(6):348-53. PubMed ID: 21983548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The relationship of Central Corneal Thickness (CCT) to Thinnest Central Cornea (TCC) in healthy adults.
Ashwin PT; Shah S; Pushpoth S; Wehbeh L; Ilango B
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2009 Apr; 32(2):64-7. PubMed ID: 19181565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Agreement of post-LASIK corneal power and corneal thickness measurements by pentacam and GALILEI corneal tomography systems.
Hsieh YH; Weng TH; Chou YC; Wu KL; Liang CM; Tai MC
J Chin Med Assoc; 2019 Jan; 82(1):72-77. PubMed ID: 30839408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
