These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25241005)

  • 1. Validation of Microtox as a first screening tool for waste classification.
    Weltens R; Deprez K; Michiels L
    Waste Manag; 2014 Dec; 34(12):2427-33. PubMed ID: 25241005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. DISCRISET: a battery of tests for fast waste classification--application of tests on waste extracts.
    Deprez K; Robbens J; Nobels I; Vanparys C; Vanermen G; Tirez K; Michiels L; Weltens R
    Waste Manag; 2012 Dec; 32(12):2218-28. PubMed ID: 22770807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Screening tests for hazard classification of complex waste materials--selection of methods.
    Weltens R; Vanermen G; Tirez K; Robbens J; Deprez K; Michiels L
    Waste Manag; 2012 Dec; 32(12):2208-17. PubMed ID: 22917872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Use of a novel battery of bioassays for the biological characterisation of hazardous wastes.
    Pablos MV; Fernández C; del Mar Babín M; María Navas J; Carbonell G; Martini F; García-Hortigüela P; Vicente Tarazona J
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2009 Jul; 72(5):1594-600. PubMed ID: 19217160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hazard property classification of waste according to the recent propositions of the EC using different methods.
    Hennebert P; van der Sloot HA; Rebischung F; Weltens R; Geerts L; Hjelmar O
    Waste Manag; 2014 Oct; 34(10):1739-51. PubMed ID: 24994468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Phytotoxicity tests of solid wastes and contaminated soils in the Czech Republic.
    Kocí V; Mocová K; Kulovaná M; Vosáhlová S
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2010 Mar; 17(3):611-23. PubMed ID: 19557447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The environmental risks of industrial waste disposal: an experimental approach including acute and chronic toxicity studies.
    Lambolez L; Vasseur P; Ferard JF; Gisbert T
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 1994 Aug; 28(3):317-28. PubMed ID: 7525226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of biological methods for a future methodological implementation of the Hazard criterion H14 'ecotoxic' in the European waste list (2000/532/EC).
    Moser H; Roembke J; Donnevert G; Becker R
    Waste Manag Res; 2011 Feb; 29(2):180-7. PubMed ID: 20430803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of mobility and bioavailability of contaminants in MSW incineration ash with aquatic and terrestrial bioassays.
    Ribé V; Nehrenheim E; Odlare M
    Waste Manag; 2014 Oct; 34(10):1871-6. PubMed ID: 24502934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of chemical and ecotoxicological characteristics of biodegradable organic residues for application to agricultural land.
    Alvarenga P; Palma P; Gonçalves AP; Fernandes RM; Cunha-Queda AC; Duarte E; Vallini G
    Environ Int; 2007 May; 33(4):505-13. PubMed ID: 17188749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of acute toxicity and genotoxic concentrations of single compounds and waste elutriates using the Microtox/Mutatox test system.
    Hauser B; Schrader G; Bahadir M
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 1997 Dec; 38(3):227-31. PubMed ID: 9469873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Proposal of concentration limits for determining the hazard property HP 14 for waste using ecotoxicological tests.
    Hennebert P
    Waste Manag; 2018 Apr; 74():74-85. PubMed ID: 29221872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of frameworks for ecotoxicological hazard classification of waste.
    Stiernström S; Wik O; Bendz D
    Waste Manag; 2016 Dec; 58():14-24. PubMed ID: 27639283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An ecotoxicological approach for hazard identification of energy ash.
    Stiernström S; Hemström K; Wik O; Carlsson G; Bengtsson BE; Breitholtz M
    Waste Manag; 2011 Feb; 31(2):342-52. PubMed ID: 20584596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of sensitivity of spirotox biotest with standard toxicity tests.
    Nałecz-Jawecki G; Sawicki J
    Arch Environ Contam Toxicol; 2002 May; 42(4):389-95. PubMed ID: 11994778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Toxicity assessment of common xenobiotic compounds on municipal activated sludge: comparison between respirometry and Microtox.
    Ricco G; Tomei MC; Ramadori R; Laera G
    Water Res; 2004 Apr; 38(8):2103-10. PubMed ID: 15087191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ecotoxicological assessment and evaluation of a pine bark biosorbent treatment of five landfill leachates.
    Ribé V; Nehrenheim E; Odlare M; Gustavsson L; Berglind R; Forsberg A
    Waste Manag; 2012 Oct; 32(10):1886-94. PubMed ID: 22703999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An integrated approach to the toxicity assessment of Irish marine sediments: validation of established marine bioassays for the monitoring of Irish marine sediments.
    Macken A; Giltrap M; Foley B; McGovern E; McHugh B; Davoren M
    Environ Int; 2008 Oct; 34(7):1023-32. PubMed ID: 18456331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of bioluminescent dinoflagellate (QwikLite) and bacterial (Microtox) rapid bioassays for the detection of metal and ammonia toxicity.
    Rosen G; Osorio-Robayo A; Rivera-Duarte I; Lapota D
    Arch Environ Contam Toxicol; 2008 May; 54(4):606-11. PubMed ID: 18026774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Toxicity assessment strategies, data requirements, and risk assessment approaches to derive health based guidance values for non-relevant metabolites of plant protection products.
    Dekant W; Melching-Kollmuss S; Kalberlah F
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2010 Mar; 56(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 19883711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.