BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25242596)

  • 1. [Uncertainty of cross calibration-applied beam quality conversion factor for the Japan Society of Medical Physics 12].
    Kinoshita N; Kita A; Takemura A; Nishimoto Y; Adachi T
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2014 Sep; 70(9):877-82. PubMed ID: 25242596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Beam quality conversion factor].
    Kawachi T; Katayose T
    Igaku Butsuri; 2013; 33(4):186-91. PubMed ID: 24893494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [A comparison of absorbed doses to water in photon beams in Japan Society of Medical Physics 01 and 12].
    Kinoshita N; Takemura A; Nishimoto Y; Kita A; Toi A; Murai E; Shimada M; Sasamoto K; Adachi T
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2013 Mar; 69(3):284-7. PubMed ID: 23514857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Comparison of the absorbed dose at calibration depth of photon beams using the Japan Society of Medical Physics 12 beam quality conversion factor in the presence or absence of a waterproofing sleeve].
    Kinoshita N; Takemura A; Kita A; Murai E; Nishimoto Y; Toi A; Shimada M; Sasamoto K; Adachi T
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2013 Oct; 69(10):1161-4. PubMed ID: 24140905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Absorbed dose measurement of photon beam with Farmer-type ionization chambers in Japanese dosimetry protocols].
    Fujisaki T; Hiraoka T; Osawa A; Nakajima M; Kuwabara A; Yokoyama K; Saitoh H; Tomaru T; Inada T
    Igaku Butsuri; 2004; 24(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 15226645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measurement of ionization chamber absorbed dose k(Q) factors in megavoltage photon beams.
    McEwen MR
    Med Phys; 2010 May; 37(5):2179-93. PubMed ID: 20527552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Beam quality conversion factors for parallel-plate ionization chambers in MV photon beams.
    Muir BR; McEwen MR; Rogers DW
    Med Phys; 2012 Mar; 39(3):1618-31. PubMed ID: 22380394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Experimental determination of beam quality conversion factors k(Q) in clinical photon beams using ferrous sulphate (Fricke) dosimetry.
    Palm A; Mattsson O
    Med Phys; 2002 Dec; 29(12):2756-62. PubMed ID: 12512708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measured and Monte Carlo calculated K(Q) factors: accuracy and comparison.
    Muir BR; McEwen MR; Rogers DW
    Med Phys; 2011 Aug; 38(8):4600-9. PubMed ID: 21928633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electron beam quality k(Q,Q0) factors for various ionization chambers: a Monte Carlo investigation with PENELOPE.
    Erazo F; Brualla L; Lallena AM
    Phys Med Biol; 2014 Nov; 59(21):6673-91. PubMed ID: 25325343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Direct determination of k
    Osinga-Blättermann JM; Brons S; Greilich S; Jäkel O; Krauss A
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Mar; 62(6):2033-2054. PubMed ID: 28212111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electron beam water calorimetry measurements to obtain beam quality conversion factors.
    Muir BR; Cojocaru CD; McEwen MR; Ross CK
    Med Phys; 2017 Oct; 44(10):5433-5444. PubMed ID: 28688120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. kQ factors for ionization chamber dosimetry in clinical proton beams.
    Vatnitsky SM; Siebers JV; Miller DW
    Med Phys; 1996 Jan; 23(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 8700030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Determination of k
    Osinga-Blättermann JM; Krauss A
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Dec; 64(1):015009. PubMed ID: 30524008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ionization chamber dosimetry based on
    Araki F; Ohno T; Umeno S
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Sep; 63(18):185018. PubMed ID: 30101751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Changes in deviation of absorbed dose to water among users by chamber calibration shift.
    Katayose T; Saitoh H; Igari M; Chang W; Hashimoto S; Morioka M
    Jpn J Radiol; 2017 Jul; 35(7):389-397. PubMed ID: 28528467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Outline of standard dosimetry of absorbed dose to water in external beam radiotherapy].
    Saitoh H
    Igaku Butsuri; 2013; 33(4):171-8. PubMed ID: 24893492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison and uncertainty evaluation of different calibration protocols and ionization chambers for low-energy surface brachytherapy dosimetry.
    Candela-Juan C; Vijande J; García-Martínez T; Niatsetski Y; Nauta G; Schuurman J; Ouhib Z; Ballester F; Perez-Calatayud J
    Med Phys; 2015 Aug; 42(8):4954-64. PubMed ID: 26233221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reference dosimetry in clinical high-energy electron beams: comparison of the AAPM TG-51 and AAPM TG-21 dosimetry protocols.
    Saiful Huq M; Song H; Andreo P; Houser CJ
    Med Phys; 2001 Oct; 28(10):2077-87. PubMed ID: 11695769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Correction factors for A1SL ionization chamber dosimetry in TomoTherapy: machine-specific, plan-class, and clinical fields.
    Gago-Arias A; Rodriguez-Romero R; Sanchez-Rubio P; Miguel Gonzalez-Castano D; Gomez F; Nunez L; Palmans H; Sharpe P; Pardo-Montero J
    Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):1964-70. PubMed ID: 22482617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.