These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25242699)

  • 1. Electrophysiological evidence for altered visual, but not auditory, selective attention in adolescent cochlear implant users.
    Harris J; Kamke MR
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Nov; 78(11):1908-16. PubMed ID: 25242699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Enhanced audio-visual interactions in the auditory cortex of elderly cochlear-implant users.
    Schierholz I; Finke M; Schulte S; Hauthal N; Kantzke C; Rach S; Büchner A; Dengler R; Sandmann P
    Hear Res; 2015 Oct; 328():133-47. PubMed ID: 26302946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contingent capture of involuntary visual spatial attention does not differ between normally hearing children and proficient cochlear implant users.
    Kamke MR; Van Luyn J; Constantinescu G; Harris J
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2014; 32(6):799-811. PubMed ID: 25201816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of evoked potentials to dyadic tones after cochlear implantation.
    Sandmann P; Eichele T; Buechler M; Debener S; Jäncke L; Dillier N; Hugdahl K; Meyer M
    Brain; 2009 Jul; 132(Pt 7):1967-79. PubMed ID: 19293240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Minimization of cochlear implant artifact in cortical auditory evoked potentials in children.
    Bakhos D; Roux S; Robier A; Bonnet-Brilhault F; Lescanne E; Bruneau N
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Nov; 76(11):1627-32. PubMed ID: 22910837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visual stimuli can impair auditory processing in cochlear implant users.
    Champoux F; Lepore F; Gagné JP; Théoret H
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jan; 47(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 18824184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Degradation of labial information modifies audiovisual speech perception in cochlear-implanted children.
    Huyse A; Berthommier F; Leybaert J
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):110-21. PubMed ID: 23059850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visual activation of auditory cortex reflects maladaptive plasticity in cochlear implant users.
    Sandmann P; Dillier N; Eichele T; Meyer M; Kegel A; Pascual-Marqui RD; Marcar VL; Jäncke L; Debener S
    Brain; 2012 Feb; 135(Pt 2):555-68. PubMed ID: 22232592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Characterizing responses from auditory cortex in young people with several years of cochlear implant experience.
    Gordon KA; Tanaka S; Wong DD; Papsin BC
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Oct; 119(10):2347-62. PubMed ID: 18752993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using Neural Response Telemetry to Monitor Physiological Responses to Acoustic Stimulation in Hybrid Cochlear Implant Users.
    Abbas PJ; Tejani VD; Scheperle RA; Brown CJ
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):409-425. PubMed ID: 28085738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual cortex activation decrement following cochlear implantation in prelingual deafened children.
    Liu J; Liang M; Chen Y; Wang Y; Cai Y; Chen S; Chen L; Li X; Qiu Z; Jiang J; Wang J; Zheng Y
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Aug; 99():85-89. PubMed ID: 28688572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electrophysiological and speech perception measures of auditory processing in experienced adult cochlear implant users.
    Kelly AS; Purdy SC; Thorne PR
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 116(6):1235-46. PubMed ID: 15978485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An event-related brain potential study of auditory attention in cochlear implant users.
    Schierholz I; Schönermark C; Ruigendijk E; Kral A; Kopp B; Büchner A
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2021 Sep; 132(9):2290-2305. PubMed ID: 34120838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Event-related potentials for better speech perception in noise by cochlear implant users.
    Soshi T; Hisanaga S; Kodama N; Kanekama Y; Samejima Y; Yumoto E; Sekiyama K
    Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 316():110-21. PubMed ID: 25158303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Auditory Selective Attention Hindered by Visual Stimulus in Prelingually Deaf Children With Cochlear Implants.
    Chen Y; Yue Z; Liang M; Liu J; Li S; Liu J; Zheng Y
    Otol Neurotol; 2019 Jun; 40(5):e542-e547. PubMed ID: 31083094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is there a change in P300 evoked potential after 6 months in cochlear implant users?
    Amaral MSAD; Calderaro VG; Pauna HF; Massuda ET; Reis ACMB; Hyppolito MA
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2022; 88 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S50-S58. PubMed ID: 34799269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A potential neurophysiological correlate of electric-acoustic pitch matching in adult cochlear implant users: Pilot data.
    Tan CT; Martin BA; Svirsky MA
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2018 Jul; 19(4):198-209. PubMed ID: 29508662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual Processing Recruits the Auditory Cortices in Prelingually Deaf Children and Influences Cochlear Implant Outcomes.
    Liang M; Chen Y; Zhao F; Zhang J; Liu J; Zhang X; Cai Y; Chen S; Li X; Chen L; Zheng Y
    Otol Neurotol; 2017 Sep; 38(8):1104-1111. PubMed ID: 28727651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cognitive evoked potentials to speech and tonal stimuli in children with implants.
    Kileny PR; Boerst A; Zwolan T
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1997 Sep; 117(3 Pt 1):161-9. PubMed ID: 9334760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Central auditory development after long-term cochlear implant use.
    Jiwani S; Papsin BC; Gordon KA
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2013 Sep; 124(9):1868-80. PubMed ID: 23680008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.