BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

549 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25244061)

  • 1. A systematic review and economic evaluation of diagnostic strategies for Lynch syndrome.
    Snowsill T; Huxley N; Hoyle M; Jones-Hughes T; Coelho H; Cooper C; Frayling I; Hyde C
    Health Technol Assess; 2014 Sep; 18(58):1-406. PubMed ID: 25244061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Molecular testing for Lynch syndrome in people with colorectal cancer: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.
    Snowsill T; Coelho H; Huxley N; Jones-Hughes T; Briscoe S; Frayling IM; Hyde C
    Health Technol Assess; 2017 Sep; 21(51):1-238. PubMed ID: 28895526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Testing strategies for Lynch syndrome in people with endometrial cancer: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.
    Stinton C; Jordan M; Fraser H; Auguste P; Court R; Al-Khudairy L; Madan J; Grammatopoulos D; Taylor-Phillips S
    Health Technol Assess; 2021 Jun; 25(42):1-216. PubMed ID: 34169821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A model-based assessment of the cost-utility of strategies to identify Lynch syndrome in early-onset colorectal cancer patients.
    Snowsill T; Huxley N; Hoyle M; Jones-Hughes T; Coelho H; Cooper C; Frayling I; Hyde C
    BMC Cancer; 2015 Apr; 15():313. PubMed ID: 25910169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The predicted impact and cost-effectiveness of systematic testing of people with incident colorectal cancer for Lynch syndrome.
    Kang YJ; Killen J; Caruana M; Simms K; Taylor N; Frayling IM; Snowsill T; Huxley N; Coupe VM; Hughes S; Freeman V; Boussioutas A; Trainer AH; Ward RL; Mitchell G; Macrae FA; Canfell K
    Med J Aust; 2020 Feb; 212(2):72-81. PubMed ID: 31595523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cost-effectiveness analysis of genetic diagnostic strategies for Lynch syndrome in Italy.
    Pastorino R; Basile M; Tognetto A; Di Marco M; Grossi A; Lucci-Cordisco E; Scaldaferri F; De Censi A; Federici A; Villari P; Genuardi M; Ricciardi W; Boccia S
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0235038. PubMed ID: 32609729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Strategies to identify the Lynch syndrome among patients with colorectal cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Ladabaum U; Wang G; Terdiman J; Blanco A; Kuppermann M; Boland CR; Ford J; Elkin E; Phillips KA
    Ann Intern Med; 2011 Jul; 155(2):69-79. PubMed ID: 21768580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Different Genetic Testing Strategies for Lynch Syndrome in Taiwan.
    Chen YE; Kao SS; Chung RH
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0160599. PubMed ID: 27482709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Elucigene FH20 and LIPOchip for the diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolaemia: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
    Sharma P; Boyers D; Boachie C; Stewart F; Miedzybrodzka Z; Simpson W; Kilonzo M; McNamee P; Mowatt G
    Health Technol Assess; 2012; 16(17):1-266. PubMed ID: 22469073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The proportion of endometrial tumours associated with Lynch syndrome (PETALS): A prospective cross-sectional study.
    Ryan NAJ; McMahon R; Tobi S; Snowsill T; Esquibel S; Wallace AJ; Bunstone S; Bowers N; Mosneag IE; Kitson SJ; O'Flynn H; Ramchander NC; Sivalingam VN; Frayling IM; Bolton J; McVey RJ; Evans DG; Crosbie EJ
    PLoS Med; 2020 Sep; 17(9):e1003263. PubMed ID: 32941469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost-effectiveness and diagnostic effectiveness analyses of multiple algorithms for the diagnosis of Lynch syndrome.
    Gould-Suarez M; El-Serag HB; Musher B; Franco LM; Chen GJ
    Dig Dis Sci; 2014 Dec; 59(12):2913-26. PubMed ID: 24957400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Systematic review and modelling of the cost-effectiveness of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging compared with current existing testing pathways in ischaemic cardiomyopathy.
    Campbell F; Thokala P; Uttley LC; Sutton A; Sutton AJ; Al-Mohammad A; Thomas SM
    Health Technol Assess; 2014 Sep; 18(59):1-120. PubMed ID: 25265259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Chemoprevention of colorectal cancer: systematic review and economic evaluation.
    Cooper K; Squires H; Carroll C; Papaioannou D; Booth A; Logan RF; Maguire C; Hind D; Tappenden P
    Health Technol Assess; 2010 Jun; 14(32):1-206. PubMed ID: 20594533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cost-effectiveness analysis of reflex testing for Lynch syndrome in women with endometrial cancer in the UK setting.
    Snowsill TM; Ryan NAJ; Crosbie EJ; Frayling IM; Evans DG; Hyde CJ
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(8):e0221419. PubMed ID: 31469860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cost-effectiveness of routine screening for Lynch syndrome in colorectal cancer patients up to 70 years of age.
    Leenen CH; Goverde A; de Bekker-Grob EW; Wagner A; van Lier MG; Spaander MC; Bruno MJ; Tops CM; van den Ouweland AM; Dubbink HJ; Kuipers EJ; Dinjens WN; van Leerdam ME; Steyerberg EW
    Genet Med; 2016 Oct; 18(10):966-73. PubMed ID: 26938782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: diagnostic strategies and their implications.
    Bonis PA; Trikalinos TA; Chung M; Chew P; Ip S; DeVine DA; Lau J
    Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep); 2007 May; (150):1-180. PubMed ID: 17764220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of Tumor Sequencing as a Replacement for Lynch Syndrome Screening and Current Molecular Tests for Patients With Colorectal Cancer.
    Hampel H; Pearlman R; Beightol M; Zhao W; Jones D; Frankel WL; Goodfellow PJ; Yilmaz A; Miller K; Bacher J; Jacobson A; Paskett E; Shields PG; Goldberg RM; de la Chapelle A; Shirts BH; Pritchard CC;
    JAMA Oncol; 2018 Jun; 4(6):806-813. PubMed ID: 29596542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lead-I ECG for detecting atrial fibrillation in patients with an irregular pulse using single time point testing: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
    Duarte R; Stainthorpe A; Greenhalgh J; Richardson M; Nevitt S; Mahon J; Kotas E; Boland A; Thom H; Marshall T; Hall M; Takwoingi Y
    Health Technol Assess; 2020 Jan; 24(3):1-164. PubMed ID: 31933471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measurement of exhaled nitric oxide concentration in asthma: a systematic review and economic evaluation of NIOX MINO, NIOX VERO and NObreath.
    Harnan SE; Tappenden P; Essat M; Gomersall T; Minton J; Wong R; Pavord I; Everard M; Lawson R
    Health Technol Assess; 2015 Oct; 19(82):1-330. PubMed ID: 26484874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of Universal Versus Age-Restricted Screening of Colorectal Tumors for Lynch Syndrome Using Mismatch Repair Immunohistochemistry: A Cohort Study.
    Li D; Hoodfar E; Jiang SF; Udaltsova N; Pham NP; Jodesty Y; Armstrong MA; Hung YY; Baker RJ; Postlethwaite D; Ladabaum U; Levin TR; Corley DA; Bergoffen J
    Ann Intern Med; 2019 Jul; 171(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 31181578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.