BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25244150)

  • 21. The politics of gaydar: ideological differences in the use of gendered cues in categorizing sexual orientation.
    Stern C; West TV; Jost JT; Rule NO
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Mar; 104(3):520-41. PubMed ID: 23276275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. I like my voice better: self-enhancement bias in perceptions of voice attractiveness.
    Hughes SM; Harrison MA
    Perception; 2013; 42(9):941-9. PubMed ID: 24386714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Once more: is beauty in the eye of the beholder? Relative contributions of private and shared taste to judgments of facial attractiveness.
    Hönekopp J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Apr; 32(2):199-209. PubMed ID: 16634665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Dissociating averageness and attractiveness: attractive faces are not always average.
    DeBruine LM; Jones BC; Unger L; Little AC; Feinberg DR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Dec; 33(6):1420-30. PubMed ID: 18085954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Stereotyping based on voice in the presence of individuating information: vocal femininity affects perceived competence but not warmth.
    Sei Jin Ko ; Judd CM; Stapel DA
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2009 Feb; 35(2):198-211. PubMed ID: 19141624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Everything's Relative? Relative Differences in Processing Fluency and the Effects on Liking.
    Forster M; Gerger G; Leder H
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0135944. PubMed ID: 26288314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Simultaneous perceptual and response biases on sequential face attractiveness judgments.
    Pegors TK; Mattar MG; Bryan PB; Epstein RA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2015 Jun; 144(3):664-73. PubMed ID: 25867223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effects of partner beauty on opposite-sex attractiveness judgments.
    Little AC; Caldwell CA; Jones BC; DeBruine LM
    Arch Sex Behav; 2011 Dec; 40(6):1119-27. PubMed ID: 21901646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation.
    Alter AL; Oppenheimer DM
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2009 Aug; 13(3):219-35. PubMed ID: 19638628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The future is now: the impact of present fluency in judgments about the future.
    Palma TA; Santos AS; Garcia-Marques L
    Memory; 2018 Feb; 26(2):144-153. PubMed ID: 28594272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Facial attractiveness, applicants' qualifications, and judges' expertise about decisions in preselective recruitment.
    Dubois M; Pansu P
    Psychol Rep; 2004 Dec; 95(3 Pt 2):1129-34. PubMed ID: 15762393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Physical Attractiveness Biases Judgments Pertaining to the Moral Domain of Purity.
    Klebl C; Rhee JJ; Greenaway KH; Luo Y; Bastian B
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2023 Feb; 49(2):282-295. PubMed ID: 34964373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of the "beauty is good" stereotype on children's information processing.
    Ramsey JL; Langlois JH
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2002 Mar; 81(3):320-40. PubMed ID: 11884093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The Fluency Amplification Model: fluent stimuli show more intense but not evidently more positive evaluations.
    Albrecht S; Carbon CC
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 May; 148():195-203. PubMed ID: 24603044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The vocal clarity of female speech-language pathology students: an exploratory study.
    Warhurst S; Madill C; McCabe P; Heard R; Yiu E
    J Voice; 2012 Jan; 26(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 21439779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Facial attractiveness is appraised in a glance.
    Olson IR; Marshuetz C
    Emotion; 2005 Dec; 5(4):498-502. PubMed ID: 16366753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Consensus in personality judgments at zero acquaintance.
    Albright L; Kenny DA; Malloy TE
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1988 Sep; 55(3):387-95. PubMed ID: 3171912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Familiarity influences judgments of sex: the case of voice recognition.
    Burton AM; Bonner L
    Perception; 2004; 33(6):747-52. PubMed ID: 15330367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The primacy of beauty in judging the aesthetics of objects.
    Jacobsen T; Buchta K; Köhler M; Schröger E
    Psychol Rep; 2004 Jun; 94(3 Pt 2):1253-60. PubMed ID: 15362400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The role of experience on judgments of dysphonia.
    Eadie TL; Kapsner M; Rosenzweig J; Waugh P; Hillel A; Merati A
    J Voice; 2010 Sep; 24(5):564-73. PubMed ID: 19765949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.