These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25244890)
1. A systematic evaluation of websites offering information on chronic kidney disease. Lutz ER; Costello KL; Jo M; Gilet CA; Hawley JM; Bridgman JC; Song MK Nephrol Nurs J; 2014; 41(4):355-63; 364. PubMed ID: 25244890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of the quality and variability of health information on chronic pain websites using the DISCERN instrument. Kaicker J; Borg Debono V; Dang W; Buckley N; Thabane L BMC Med; 2010 Oct; 8():59. PubMed ID: 20939875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Critical Analysis of the Information Available Online for Ménière's Disease. Bojrab DI; Fritz C; Babu S; Lin KF Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2020 Mar; 162(3):329-336. PubMed ID: 31986955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Structure and content of chronic kidney disease information on the World Wide Web: barriers to public understanding of a pandemic. Calderón JL; Zadshir A; Norris K Nephrol News Issues; 2004 Oct; 18(11):76, 78-9, 81-4. PubMed ID: 15551616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quality and Readability of English-Language Internet Information for Tinnitus. Manchaiah V; Dockens AL; Flagge A; Bellon-Harn M; Azios JH; Kelly-Campbell RJ; Andersson G J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Jan; 30(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 30461391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An Evaluation of Websites Offering Caregiver Education for Tracheostomy and Home Mechanical Ventilation. Misra AR; Oermann MH; Teague MS; Ledbetter LS J Pediatr Nurs; 2021; 56():64-69. PubMed ID: 33186865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing Readability and Reliability of Online Patient Information Regarding Vestibular Schwannoma. Spiers H; Amin N; Lakhani R; Martin AJ; Patel PM Otol Neurotol; 2017 Dec; 38(10):e470-e475. PubMed ID: 28885483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluating the Quality, Content, and Readability of Online Resources for Failed Back Spinal Surgery. Guo WJ; Wang WK; Xu D; Qiao Z; Shi YL; Luo P Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Apr; 44(7):494-502. PubMed ID: 30234809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Risks Associated With Computed Tomography Scans: An Assessment of the Readability and Reliability of Online Text Available for Patient Information and Guidance. Hemaya M; Hemaya M; Habeeb A Cureus; 2022 Oct; 14(10):e30758. PubMed ID: 36447695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analysis of the Patient Information Quality and Readability on Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) on the Internet. Priyanka P; Hadi YB; Reynolds GJ Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018; 2018():2849390. PubMed ID: 30510923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Readability and Quality of Online Patient Education Material on Websites of Breast Imaging Centers. Choudhery S; Xi Y; Chen H; Aboul-Fettouh N; Goldenmerry Y; Ho C; Viroslav H; Zhang C; Goudreau S J Am Coll Radiol; 2020 Oct; 17(10):1245-1251. PubMed ID: 32428435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A critical appraisal of web-based information on shoulder pain comparing biomedical vs. psychosocial information. Barrett DR; Boone JD; Butch JO; Cavender JA; Sole G; Wassinger CA J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2023 Jan; 32(1):e23-e32. PubMed ID: 36108880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Osteotomy around the knee: Assessment of quality, content and readability of online information. Broderick JM; McCarthy A; Hogan N Knee; 2021 Jan; 28():139-150. PubMed ID: 33360380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure: an assessment of the quality and readability of online information. Lim SJM; Kelly M; Selvarajah L; Murray M; Scanlon T BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 May; 21(1):149. PubMed ID: 33952225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Readability and Quality of Web-Based Patient Information on Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Quantitative Content Analysis. Tan DJY; Ko TK; Fan KS JMIR Form Res; 2023 Nov; 7():e47762. PubMed ID: 38010802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Internet-Based Resources Frequently Provide Inaccurate and Out-of-Date Recommendations on Preoperative Fasting: A Systematic Review. Roughead T; Sewell D; Ryerson CJ; Fisher JH; Flexman AM Anesth Analg; 2016 Dec; 123(6):1463-1468. PubMed ID: 27644057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quality and readability of online health information on menopausal hormone therapy in Canada: what are our patients reading? Murtaza F; Shirreff L; Huang LN; Jacobson M; Jarcevic R; Christakis MK Menopause; 2021 Dec; 29(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 34905747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Critical analysis of the quality of internet resources for patients with varicose veins. Yan Q; Field AR; Jensen KJ; Goei C; Jiang Z; Davies MG J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2021 Jul; 9(4):1017-1024.e7. PubMed ID: 33340728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluating the readability, quality and reliability of online patient education materials on transcutaneuous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS). Erkin Y; Hanci V; Ozduran E Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Apr; 102(16):e33529. PubMed ID: 37083809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. IVC filter - assessing the readability and quality of patient information on the Internet. Ko TK; Yun Tan DJ; Hadeed S J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2024 Mar; 12(2):101695. PubMed ID: 37898304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]