78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25244909)
1. How should the health benefits of food safety programs be measured?
Smith VK; Mansfield C; Strong A
Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res; 2014; 24():161-202. PubMed ID: 25244909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Attitudes and beliefs on the establishment of a national food safety authority in Cyprus. A population-based survey.
Hadjigeorgiou A; Talias MA; Soteriades ES; Philalithis A; Psaroulaki A; Gikas A; Tselentis Y
Appetite; 2014 Apr; 75():90-6. PubMed ID: 24378621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Awakening consumer stewardship of health benefits: prevalence and differentiation of new health plan models.
Rosenthal M; Milstein A
Health Serv Res; 2004 Aug; 39(4 Pt 2):1055-70. PubMed ID: 15230911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clients' safe food-handling knowledge and risk behavior in a home-delivered meal program.
Almanza BA; Namkung Y; Ismail JA; Nelson DC
J Am Diet Assoc; 2007 May; 107(5):816-21. PubMed ID: 17467379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Toward a sustainability label for food products: an analysis of experts' and consumers' acceptance.
Engels SV; Hansmann R; Scholz RW
Ecol Food Nutr; 2010; 49(1):30-60. PubMed ID: 21883088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Food safety and consumer willingness to pay for certified traceable food in China.
Xu L; Wu L
J Sci Food Agric; 2010 Jun; 90(8):1368-73. PubMed ID: 20474057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Who regulates food? Australians' perceptions of responsibility for food safety.
Henderson J; Coveney J; Ward P
Aust J Prim Health; 2010; 16(4):344-51. PubMed ID: 21138703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Consumer-perceived quality in 'traditional' food chains: the case of the Greek meat supply chain.
Krystallis A; Chryssochoidis G; Scholderer J
Appetite; 2007 Jan; 48(1):54-68. PubMed ID: 16965836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Keeping up appearances: perceptions of street food safety in urban Kumasi, Ghana.
Rheinländer T; Olsen M; Bakang JA; Takyi H; Konradsen F; Samuelsen H
J Urban Health; 2008 Nov; 85(6):952-64. PubMed ID: 18821020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Willingness to pay for private and public road safety in stated preference studies: why the difference?
Svensson M; Vredin Johansson M
Accid Anal Prev; 2010 Jul; 42(4):1205-12. PubMed ID: 20441833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Consumer preferences and willingness to pay for value-added chicken product attributes.
Martínez Michel L; Anders S; Wismer WV
J Food Sci; 2011 Oct; 76(8):S469-77. PubMed ID: 22417604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Economic approaches to measuring the significance of food safety in international trade.
Caswell JA
Int J Food Microbiol; 2000 Dec; 62(3):261-6. PubMed ID: 11156270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Consumers' preferences for the communication of risk information in drug advertising.
Davis JJ
Health Aff (Millwood); 2007; 26(3):863-70. PubMed ID: 17485767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Public risk perception of food additives and food scares. The case in Suzhou, China.
Wu L; Zhong Y; Shan L; Qin W
Appetite; 2013 Nov; 70():90-8. PubMed ID: 23831014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Toward improving food safety in the domestic environment: a multi-item Rasch scale for the measurement of the safety efficacy of domestic food-handling practices.
Fischer AR; Frewer LJ; Nauta MJ
Risk Anal; 2006 Oct; 26(5):1323-38. PubMed ID: 17054534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Understanding consumers' preferences and decision to enrol in community-based health insurance in rural West Africa.
De Allegri M; Sanon M; Bridges J; Sauerborn R
Health Policy; 2006 Mar; 76(1):58-71. PubMed ID: 15946762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Do consumer reports of health plan quality affect health plan selection?
Spranca M; Kanouse DE; Elliott M; Short PF; Farley DO; Hays RD
Health Serv Res; 2000 Dec; 35(5 Pt 1):933-47. PubMed ID: 11130805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. European consumer response to packaging technologies for improved beef safety.
Van Wezemael L; Ueland Ø; Verbeke W
Meat Sci; 2011 Sep; 89(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 21543160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of risk information exposure on consumers' responses to foods with insect contamination.
Kimura A; Magariyama Y; Miyanoshita A; Imamura T; Shichiri K; Masuda T; Wada Y
J Food Sci; 2014 Feb; 79(2):S246-50. PubMed ID: 24446825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. U.S. consumers attitudes toward farm animal cloning.
Brooks KR; Lusk JL
Appetite; 2011 Oct; 57(2):483-92. PubMed ID: 21736907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
