151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2524546)
1. Perceptual organization and precategorical acoustic storage.
Frankish C
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 May; 15(3):469-479. PubMed ID: 2524546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Children's suffix effects for verbal working memory reflect phonological coding and perceptual grouping.
Lowenstein JH; Cribb C; Shell P; Yuan Y; Nittrouer S
J Exp Child Psychol; 2019 Jul; 183():276-294. PubMed ID: 30933869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Status of spatial location in auditory sensory memory: evidence from rapidly presented lists.
Odgers RP; Colle HA
J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1980 Sep; 6(5):546-57. PubMed ID: 7430969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Immediate serial recall of mixed-modality lists.
Greene RL
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 Mar; 15(2):266-74. PubMed ID: 2522515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The modality effect and echoic persistence.
Watkins OC; Watkins MJ
J Exp Psychol Gen; 1980 Sep; 109(3):251-78. PubMed ID: 6447188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Modalities of memory: is reading lips like hearing voices?
Maidment DW; Macken B; Jones DM
Cognition; 2013 Dec; 129(3):471-93. PubMed ID: 24041834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Serial recall of two-voice lists: implications for theories of auditory recency and suffix effects.
Greene RL
Mem Cognit; 1991 Jan; 19(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 2017031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Auditory and temporal factors in the modality effect.
Crowder RG
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1986 Apr; 12(2):268-78. PubMed ID: 2939183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of talker variability on recall of spoken word lists.
Martin CS; Mullennix JW; Pisoni DB; Summers WV
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 Jul; 15(4):676-84. PubMed ID: 2526857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Capturing the suffix: cognitive streaming in immediate serial recall.
Nicholls AP; Jones DM
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jan; 28(1):12-28. PubMed ID: 11827075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Explanations of grouping in immediate ordered recall.
Frick RW
Mem Cognit; 1989 Sep; 17(5):551-62. PubMed ID: 2796740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Echoic and retrieval accounts of the long-term modality effect tested using the suffix procedure.
Huang ST; Glenberg AM
Am J Psychol; 1986; 99(4):453-70. PubMed ID: 3812815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Similarities between the irrelevant sound effect and the suffix effect.
Hanley JR; Bourgaize J
Mem Cognit; 2018 Aug; 46(6):841-848. PubMed ID: 29600481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Manipulations of irrelevant information: suffix effects with articulatory suppression and irrelevant speech.
Surprenant AM; LeCompte DC; Neath I
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 May; 53(2):325-48. PubMed ID: 10881609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Adapting to an irrelevant item in an immediate recall task.
Watkins MJ; Sechler ES
Mem Cognit; 1989 Nov; 17(6):682-92. PubMed ID: 2811665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Unusual modality effects in less-skilled readers.
Penney CG; Godsell A
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1999 Jan; 25(1):284-9. PubMed ID: 9949714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Inverting the modality effect in serial recall.
Beaman CP
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Apr; 55(2):371-89. PubMed ID: 12047050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Enhanced recency effects with changing-state and primary-linguistic stimuli.
Kallman HJ; Cameron P
Mem Cognit; 1989 May; 17(3):318-28. PubMed ID: 2725269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is there a modality effect? Evidence for visual recency and suffix effects.
Battacchi MW; Pelamatti GM; Umiltà C
Mem Cognit; 1990 Nov; 18(6):651-8. PubMed ID: 2266866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Perceptual-gestural (mis)mapping in serial short-term memory: the impact of talker variability.
Hughes RW; Marsh JE; Jones DM
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1411-25. PubMed ID: 19857013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
