These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Degree of preservation of the neurovascular bundles during radical prostatectomy and urinary continence 1 year after surgery. Steineck G; Bjartell A; Hugosson J; Axén E; Carlsson S; Stranne J; Wallerstedt A; Persson J; Wilderäng U; Thorsteinsdottir T; Gustafsson O; Lagerkvist M; Jiborn T; Haglind E; Wiklund P; Eur Urol; 2015 Mar; 67(3):559-68. PubMed ID: 25457018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Tension and energy-free robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with interfascial dissection of the neurovascular bundles. Mattei A; Naspro R; Annino F; Burke D; Guida R; Gaston R Eur Urol; 2007 Sep; 52(3):687-94. PubMed ID: 17587488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Functional and oncologic outcomes comparing interfascial and intrafascial nerve sparing in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomies. Potdevin L; Ercolani M; Jeong J; Kim IY J Endourol; 2009 Sep; 23(9):1479-84. PubMed ID: 19694530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Urinary Incontinence and Erectile Dysfunction After Robotic Versus Open Radical Prostatectomy: A Prospective, Controlled, Nonrandomised Trial. Haglind E; Carlsson S; Stranne J; Wallerstedt A; Wilderäng U; Thorsteinsdottir T; Lagerkvist M; Damber JE; Bjartell A; Hugosson J; Wiklund P; Steineck G; Eur Urol; 2015 Aug; 68(2):216-25. PubMed ID: 25770484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-term oncological and continence outcomes after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single-centre experience. Busch J; Stephan C; Herold A; Erber B; Kempkensteffen C; Hinz S; Lein M; Weikert S; Miller K; Magheli A BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt C):E985-90. PubMed ID: 22672442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Functional and Oncological Outcomes After Open Versus Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy for Localised Prostate Cancer: 8-Year Follow-up. Lantz A; Bock D; Akre O; Angenete E; Bjartell A; Carlsson S; Modig KK; Nyberg M; Kollberg KS; Steineck G; Stranne J; Wiklund P; Haglind E Eur Urol; 2021 Nov; 80(5):650-660. PubMed ID: 34538508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Endopelvic fascia preservation during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: does it affect urinary incontinence? Kwon SY; Lee JN; Kim HT; Kim TH; Kim BW; Choi GS; Kwon TG Scand J Urol; 2014 Dec; 48(6):506-12. PubMed ID: 25008957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A matched-pair comparison between bilateral intrafascial and interfascial nerve-sparing techniques in extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Zheng T; Zhang X; Ma X; Li HZ; Gao JP; Cai W; Dong J; Chen GF; Wang BJ; Shi TP; Song EL; Chen WH; Huang QB Asian J Androl; 2013 Jul; 15(4):513-7. PubMed ID: 23708458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radical prostatectomy: initial experience with robot-assisted laparoscopic procedures at a large university hospital. Fode M; Sønksen J; Jakobsen H Scand J Urol; 2014 Jun; 48(3):252-8. PubMed ID: 24341725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Laparoscopic surgery experience does not influence oncological and functional results of robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Cetin T; Yalcin MY; Karaca E; Ozbilen MH; Ergani B; Koc G; Boyacioglu H; Ilbey YO Urologia; 2022 May; 89(2):240-243. PubMed ID: 33764234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Do we need the nerve sparing radical prostatectomy techniques (intrafascial vs. interfascial) in men with erectile dysfunction? Results of a single-centre study. Khoder WY; Waidelich R; Seitz M; Becker AJ; Buchner A; Trittschler S; Stief CG World J Urol; 2015 Mar; 33(3):301-7. PubMed ID: 24752607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Retzius-Sparing Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: A Safe Surgical Technique with Superior Continence Outcomes. Sayyid RK; Simpson WG; Lu C; Terris MK; Klaassen Z; Madi R J Endourol; 2017 Dec; 31(12):1244-1250. PubMed ID: 28859492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Modified Apical Dissection and Lateral Prostatic Fascia Preservation Improves Early Postoperative Functional Recovery in Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Results from a Propensity Score-matched Analysis. Covas Moschovas M; Bhat S; Onol FF; Rogers T; Roof S; Mazzone E; Mottrie A; Patel V Eur Urol; 2020 Dec; 78(6):875-884. PubMed ID: 32593529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparing High-Intensity Focal Ultrasound Hemiablation to Robotic Radical Prostatectomy in the Management of Unilateral Prostate Cancer: A Matched-Pair Analysis. Albisinni S; Aoun F; Bellucci S; Biaou I; Limani K; Hawaux E; Peltier A; van Velthoven R J Endourol; 2017 Jan; 31(1):14-19. PubMed ID: 27799004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Outcome of Robotic Radical Prostatectomy in Men Over 74. Ubrig B; Boy A; Heiland M; Roosen A J Endourol; 2018 Feb; 32(2):106-110. PubMed ID: 29232985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Early biochemical recurrence, urinary continence and potency outcomes following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Berg KD; Thomsen FB; Hvarness H; Christensen IJ; Iversen P Scand J Urol; 2014 Aug; 48(4):356-66. PubMed ID: 24579803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]