These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2524570)

  • 1. The effects of beam hardening on digital subtraction radiography.
    Webber RL; Tzukert A; Ruttimann U
    J Periodontal Res; 1989 Jan; 24(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 2524570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Calibration errors in digital subtraction radiography.
    Webber RL; Ruttimann UE; Heaven TJ
    J Periodontal Res; 1990 Sep; 25(5):268-75. PubMed ID: 2145412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The detection of in vitro produced periodontal bone lesions by conventional radiography and photographic subtraction radiography using observers and quantitative digital subtraction radiography.
    Janssen PT; van Palenstein Helderman WH; van Aken J
    J Clin Periodontol; 1989 Jul; 16(6):335-41. PubMed ID: 2668346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of projective aspects variations on estimates of changes in bone mass using digital subtraction radiography.
    Loftin R; Webber R; Horton R; Tyndall D; Moriarty J
    J Periodontal Res; 1998 Aug; 33(6):352-8. PubMed ID: 9777586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computer-assisted subtraction radiography in periodontal diagnosis.
    Gröndahl K
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1987; 50():1-44. PubMed ID: 3321498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Problems around the in vitro and in vivo application of quantitative digital subtraction radiography.
    Janssen PT; van Aken J
    J Clin Periodontol; 1989 May; 16(5):323-30. PubMed ID: 2656771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Frequent, low-dose, improved-contrast radiographic images with the use of narrow x-ray beams.
    Benn DK
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1992 Aug; 74(2):221-9. PubMed ID: 1508533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Digital subtraction radiography for detecting cortical and cancellous bone changes in the periapical region.
    Tyndall DA; Kapa SF; Bagnell CP
    J Endod; 1990 Apr; 16(4):173-8. PubMed ID: 2074408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantitative analysis of periodontal defects in a skull model by subtraction radiography using a digital imaging device.
    Young SJ; Chaibi MS; Graves DT; Majzoub Z; Boustany F; Cochran D; Nummikoski P
    J Periodontol; 1996 Aug; 67(8):763-9. PubMed ID: 8866315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Studies on the use of digital radiography for the assessment of periapical bone lesions.
    Kullendorff B
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1996; 118():1-40. PubMed ID: 8971996
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation by digital subtraction radiography of induced changes in the bone density of the female rat mandible.
    Mahl CR; Fontanella V
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Dec; 37(8):438-44. PubMed ID: 19033428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantitative measurement of periodontal bone changes by digital subtraction.
    Vos MH; Janssen PT; van Aken J; Heethaar RM
    J Periodontal Res; 1986 Nov; 21(6):583-91. PubMed ID: 2947992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Color conversion of alveolar bone density changes in digital subtraction images.
    Brägger U; Pasquali L
    J Clin Periodontol; 1989 Apr; 16(4):209-14. PubMed ID: 2654196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantitative analysis of apical root resorption by means of digital subtraction radiography.
    Heo MS; Lee SS; Lee KH; Choi HM; Choi SC; Park TW
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Mar; 91(3):369-73. PubMed ID: 11250638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of technical parameters on image perception using two types of dental radiographs.
    Nielsen PM; Weber HP; zen Ruffinen S; Brecx M; Joss A; Lang NP
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1989; 99(7):777-81. PubMed ID: 2692154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Digital subtraction radiography in artificial recurrent caries detection.
    Nummikoski PV; Martinez TS; Matteson SR; McDavid WD; Dove SB
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1992 May; 21(2):59-64. PubMed ID: 1397457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Observer evaluation of scatter subtraction for digital portable chest radiographs.
    Baker JA; Floyd CE; Lo JY; Ravin CE
    Invest Radiol; 1993 Aug; 28(8):667-70. PubMed ID: 8375997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detection and measurement of simulated early rheumatoid lesions of the hand using digital subtraction radiography.
    Bolander ME; Gardiner J; Coyle J; Joyce M; Himmel HH; Thornton BC; Ruttimann UE
    Invest Radiol; 1990 Jun; 25(6):708-13. PubMed ID: 2191935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy in detecting bone lesions in vitro with conventional and subtracted direct digital imaging.
    Stassinakis A; Brägger U; Stojanovic M; Bürgin W; Lussi A; Lang NP
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Nov; 24(4):232-7. PubMed ID: 9161167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An evaluation of the origin of trabecular bone patterns using visual and digital image analysis.
    Jett S; Shrout MK; Mailhot JM; Potter BJ; Borke JL
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2004 Nov; 98(5):598-604. PubMed ID: 15529133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.