These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25245705)

  • 1. Hierarchy of evidence and appraisal of limitations (HEAL) grading system.
    Gugiu PC
    Eval Program Plann; 2015 Feb; 48():149-59. PubMed ID: 25245705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An application of a new evidence grading system to research on the chronic care model.
    Gugiu PC; Westine CD; Coryn CL; Hobson KA
    Eval Health Prof; 2013 Mar; 36(1):3-43. PubMed ID: 22473325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A critical appraisal of standard guidelines for grading levels of evidence.
    Gugiu PC; Gugiu MR
    Eval Health Prof; 2010 Sep; 33(3):233-55. PubMed ID: 20801972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Position: methods and designs of empirical research in the field of education - inventory and barriers for experimental research].
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2013; 107(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 23415339
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rigor: lost in the quest for evidence-based practice.
    Florczak KL
    Nurs Sci Q; 2011 Jul; 24(3):202-5. PubMed ID: 21742708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Making GRADE accessible: a proposal for graphic display of evidence quality assessments.
    Khan KS; Borowiack E; Roos C; Kowalska M; Zapalska A; Mol BW; Mignini L; Meads C; Walczak J;
    Evid Based Med; 2011 Jun; 16(3):65-9. PubMed ID: 21593102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. From randomized controlled trials to evidence grading schemes: current state of evidence-based practice in social sciences.
    Boruch R; Rui N
    J Evid Based Med; 2008 Nov; 1(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 21348975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating health promotion: a tale of three errors.
    Tones K
    Patient Educ Couns; 2000 Feb; 39(2-3):227-36. PubMed ID: 11040722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. "They just know": the epistemological politics of "evidence-based" non-formal education.
    Archibald T
    Eval Program Plann; 2015 Feb; 48():137-48. PubMed ID: 25204228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Critical appraisal. 5. Randomised controlled trials: questions for valid evidence.
    Nelson EA
    NT Learn Curve; 1999 Jul; 3(5):6-8. PubMed ID: 10795227
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Editorial: "Better by design" - why randomized controlled trials are the building blocks of evidence-based practice.
    J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 2013 Mar; 54(3):225-6. PubMed ID: 23397896
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing rating paradigms for evidence-based program registers in behavioral health: evidentiary criteria and implications for assessing programs.
    Means SN; Magura S; Burkhardt JT; Schröter DC; Coryn CL
    Eval Program Plann; 2015 Feb; 48():100-16. PubMed ID: 25450778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Randomized clinical trials and observational studies: guidelines for assessing respective strengths and limitations.
    Hannan EL
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2008 Jun; 1(3):211-7. PubMed ID: 19463302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validity of the MAGIC study: sufficient for recommendations?
    Bauer K; Porzsolt F; Henne-Bruns D
    Hepatogastroenterology; 2013 Oct; 60(127):1822-4. PubMed ID: 24624448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The importance of preservation of the ethical principle of equipoise in the design of clinical trials: relative impact of the methodological quality domains on the treatment effect in randomized controlled trials.
    Djulbegovic B; Cantor A; Clarke M
    Account Res; 2003; 10(4):301-15. PubMed ID: 14989285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Randomized controlled trials: methodological concepts and critique.
    Salmond SS
    Orthop Nurs; 2008; 27(2):116-22; quiz 123-4. PubMed ID: 18385595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A reporting guideline for clinical platelet transfusion studies from the BEST Collaborative.
    Meyer E; Delaney M; Lin Y; Morris A; Pavenski K; Tinmouth A; Murphy M; Slichter SJ; Heddle N; Dumont LJ
    Transfusion; 2013 Jun; 53(6):1328-34. PubMed ID: 23003345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines can improve wound care.
    Weller C; McNeil J
    J Wound Care; 2010 Aug; 19(8):347-53. PubMed ID: 20852507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A call for the reporting of effect sizes in research reports to enhance critical appraisal and evidence-based practice.
    Mays MZ; Melnyk BM
    Worldviews Evid Based Nurs; 2009; 6(3):125-9. PubMed ID: 19744052
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.