These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25246238)

  • 1. Systematic assessment of imputation performance using the 1000 Genomes reference panels.
    Liu Q; Cirulli ET; Han Y; Yao S; Liu S; Zhu Q
    Brief Bioinform; 2015 Jul; 16(4):549-62. PubMed ID: 25246238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of genome-wide imputation of untyped markers and impacts on statistical power for association studies.
    Hao K; Chudin E; McElwee J; Schadt EE
    BMC Genet; 2009 Jun; 10():27. PubMed ID: 19531258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the accuracy of imputed sequence variant genotypes and their utility for causal variant detection in cattle.
    Pausch H; MacLeod IM; Fries R; Emmerling R; Bowman PJ; Daetwyler HD; Goddard ME
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Feb; 49(1):24. PubMed ID: 28222685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comprehensive evaluation of imputation performance in African Americans.
    Chanda P; Yuhki N; Li M; Bader JS; Hartz A; Boerwinkle E; Kao WH; Arking DE
    J Hum Genet; 2012 Jul; 57(7):411-21. PubMed ID: 22648186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rare variant genotype imputation with thousands of study-specific whole-genome sequences: implications for cost-effective study designs.
    Pistis G; Porcu E; Vrieze SI; Sidore C; Steri M; Danjou F; Busonero F; Mulas A; Zoledziewska M; Maschio A; Brennan C; Lai S; Miller MB; Marcelli M; Urru MF; Pitzalis M; Lyons RH; Kang HM; Jones CM; Angius A; Iacono WG; Schlessinger D; McGue M; Cucca F; Abecasis GR; Sanna S
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2015 Jul; 23(7):975-83. PubMed ID: 25293720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comprehensive Assessment of Genotype Imputation Performance.
    Shi S; Yuan N; Yang M; Du Z; Wang J; Sheng X; Wu J; Xiao J
    Hum Hered; 2018; 83(3):107-116. PubMed ID: 30669139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison among three variant callers and assessment of the accuracy of imputation from SNP array data to whole-genome sequence level in chicken.
    Ni G; Strom TM; Pausch H; Reimer C; Preisinger R; Simianer H; Erbe M
    BMC Genomics; 2015 Oct; 16():824. PubMed ID: 26486989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genotype Imputation from Large Reference Panels.
    Das S; Abecasis GR; Browning BL
    Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet; 2018 Aug; 19():73-96. PubMed ID: 29799802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance of genotype imputation for low frequency and rare variants from the 1000 genomes.
    Zheng HF; Rong JJ; Liu M; Han F; Zhang XW; Richards JB; Wang L
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(1):e0116487. PubMed ID: 25621886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Highly accurate sequence imputation enables precise QTL mapping in Brown Swiss cattle.
    Frischknecht M; Pausch H; Bapst B; Signer-Hasler H; Flury C; Garrick D; Stricker C; Fries R; Gredler-Grandl B
    BMC Genomics; 2017 Dec; 18(1):999. PubMed ID: 29284405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of genotype imputation performance using 1000 Genomes in African American studies.
    Hancock DB; Levy JL; Gaddis NC; Bierut LJ; Saccone NL; Page GP; Johnson EO
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(11):e50610. PubMed ID: 23226329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of reference panels and software tools on genotype imputation.
    Nho K; Shen L; Kim S; Swaminathan S; Risacher SL; Saykin AJ;
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2011; 2011():1013-8. PubMed ID: 22195161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Imputation-based assessment of next generation rare exome variant arrays.
    Martin AR; Tse G; Bustamante CD; Kenny EE
    Pac Symp Biocomput; 2014; ():241-52. PubMed ID: 24297551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genotype Imputation for Latinos Using the HapMap and 1000 Genomes Project Reference Panels.
    Gao X; Haritunians T; Marjoram P; McKean-Cowdin R; Torres M; Taylor KD; Rotter JI; Gauderman WJ; Varma R
    Front Genet; 2012; 3():117. PubMed ID: 22754564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of genotype imputation in sheep breeds.
    Hayes BJ; Bowman PJ; Daetwyler HD; Kijas JW; van der Werf JH
    Anim Genet; 2012 Feb; 43(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 22221027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the imputation performance of the program IMPUTE in an admixed sample from Mexico City using several model designs.
    Krithika S; Valladares-Salgado A; Peralta J; Escobedo-de La Peña J; Kumate-Rodríguez J; Cruz M; Parra EJ
    BMC Med Genomics; 2012 May; 5():12. PubMed ID: 22549150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analyzing the Korean reference genome with meta-imputation increased the imputation accuracy and spectrum of rare variants in the Korean population.
    Hwang MY; Choi NH; Won HH; Kim BJ; Kim YJ
    Front Genet; 2022; 13():1008646. PubMed ID: 36506321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comprehensive evaluation of polygenic score and genotype imputation performances of human SNP arrays in diverse populations.
    Nguyen DT; Tran TTH; Tran MH; Tran K; Pham D; Duong NT; Nguyen Q; Vo NS
    Sci Rep; 2022 Oct; 12(1):17556. PubMed ID: 36266455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of genome-wide genotyping and reference panels on rare variants imputation.
    Zheng HF; Ladouceur M; Greenwood CM; Richards JB
    J Genet Genomics; 2012 Oct; 39(10):545-50. PubMed ID: 23089364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of genetic similarity on imputation accuracy.
    Roshyara NR; Scholz M
    BMC Genet; 2015 Jul; 16():90. PubMed ID: 26193934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.