These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25247181)

  • 1. Development of a test of suprathreshold acuity in noise in Brazilian Portuguese: a new method for hearing screening and surveillance.
    Vaez N; Desgualdo-Pereira L; Paglialonga A
    Biomed Res Int; 2014; 2014():652838. PubMed ID: 25247181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A user-operated test of suprathreshold acuity in noise for adult hearing screening: The SUN (Speech Understanding in Noise) test.
    Paglialonga A; Tognola G; Grandori F
    Comput Biol Med; 2014 Sep; 52():66-72. PubMed ID: 25016290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using the speech understanding in noise (SUN) test for adult hearing screening1.
    Paglialonga A; Grandori F; Tognola G
    Am J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 22(1):171-4. PubMed ID: 23800813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. SUN-test (Speech Understanding in Noise): A Method for Hearing Disability Screening.
    Paglialonga A; Tognola G; Grandori F
    Audiol Res; 2011 May; 1(1):e13. PubMed ID: 26557297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validation of a Computer-Administered Version of the Digits-in-Noise Test for Hearing Screening in the United States.
    Folmer RL; Vachhani J; McMillan GP; Watson C; Kidd GR; Feeney MP
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Feb; 28(2):161-169. PubMed ID: 28240983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Telephone screening tests for functionally impaired hearing: current use in seven countries and development of a US version.
    Watson CS; Kidd GR; Miller JD; Smits C; Humes LE
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(10):757-67. PubMed ID: 23169193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mild-Gain Hearing Aids as a Treatment for Adults with Self-Reported Hearing Difficulties.
    Roup CM; Post E; Lewis J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Jun; 29(6):477-494. PubMed ID: 29863462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. User-operated speech in noise test: implementation and comparison with a traditional test.
    Pedersen ER; Juhl PM
    Int J Audiol; 2014 May; 53(5):336-44. PubMed ID: 24329491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The relationship between high-frequency pure-tone hearing loss, hearing in noise test (HINT) thresholds, and the articulation index.
    Vermiglio AJ; Soli SD; Freed DJ; Fisher LM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(10):779-88. PubMed ID: 23169195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Understanding excessive SNR loss in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Grant KW; Walden TC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):258-73; quiz 337-8. PubMed ID: 23636208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Revised Speech Perception in Noise Test (R-SPIN) in a multiple signal-to-noise ratio paradigm.
    Wilson RH; McArdle R; Watts KL; Smith SL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Sep; 23(8):590-605. PubMed ID: 22967734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Acceptability, benefit and costs of early screening for hearing disability: a study of potential screening tests and models.
    Davis A; Smith P; Ferguson M; Stephens D; Gianopoulos I
    Health Technol Assess; 2007 Oct; 11(42):1-294. PubMed ID: 17927921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Hearing loss determination and assessment of the reduction in earning capacity taking speech discrimination tests in noise into account].
    Thiele C; Sukowski H; Wagener K; Kollmeier B; Lenarz T; Lesinski-Schiedat A
    HNO; 2011 Nov; 59(11):1111-7. PubMed ID: 21959774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of an internet-based speech-in-noise hearing screening test for high-frequency hearing loss: incorporating automatic conditional rescreening.
    Sheikh Rashid M; Dreschler WA
    Int Arch Occup Environ Health; 2018 Oct; 91(7):877-885. PubMed ID: 29959525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Performance-Perceptual Test (PPT) and its relationship to aided reported handicap and hearing aid satisfaction.
    Saunders GH; Forsline A
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):229-42. PubMed ID: 16672792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The performance-perceptual test and its relationship to unaided reported handicap.
    Saunders GH; Forsline A; Fausti SA
    Ear Hear; 2004 Apr; 25(2):117-26. PubMed ID: 15064656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Identification of conductive hearing loss using air conduction tests alone: reliability and validity of an automatic test battery.
    Convery E; Keidser G; Seeto M; Freeston K; Zhou D; Dillon H
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):e1-8. PubMed ID: 24080948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of coarticulation, prosody, and noise freshness on the intelligibility of digit triplets in noise.
    Lyzenga J; Smits C
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Apr; 22(4):215-21. PubMed ID: 21586256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Verbal task and motor responses (VTMR) in an adult hearing screening programme.
    Di Berardino F; Cortinovis I; Gasbarre A; Filipponi E; Milani S; Zanetti D
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2020 Feb; 40(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 30933172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Audiometric correlates of the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the elderly.
    Weinstein BE; Ventry IM
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1983 Nov; 48(4):379-84. PubMed ID: 6645432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.