112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25247225)
21. Contamination of a toothbrush with antibacterial properties by oral microorganisms.
Efstratiou M; Papaioannou W; Nakou M; Ktenas E; Vrotsos IA; Panis V
J Dent; 2007 Apr; 35(4):331-7. PubMed ID: 17118507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Effect of sonic vibration of an ultrasonic toothbrush on the removal of Streptococcus mutans biofilm from enamel surface.
Hashizume LN; Dariva A
Am J Dent; 2015 Dec; 28(6):347-50. PubMed ID: 26846041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effect of bristle stiffness of manual toothbrushes on normal and demineralized human enamel-An in vitro profilometric study.
AlShehab AH; AlHazoom AA; Alowa MH; AlAli HA; Abdulmohsen AA; Farooq I
Int J Dent Hyg; 2018 May; 16(2):e128-e132. PubMed ID: 29457353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Antimicrobial efficacy of various disinfecting solutions in reducing the contamination of the toothbrush -- a comparative study.
Balappanavar AY; Nagesh L; Ankola AV; Tangade PS; Kakodkar P; Varun S
Oral Health Prev Dent; 2009; 7(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 19583039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparative efficacy of two battery-powered toothbrushes on dental plaque removal.
Ruhlman CD; Bartizek RD; Biesbrock AR
J Clin Dent; 2002; 13(3):95-9. PubMed ID: 11887517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Evaluation of alternative methods for the disinfection of toothbrushes.
Komiyama EY; Back-Brito GN; Balducci I; Koga-Ito CY
Braz Oral Res; 2010; 24(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 20339710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. In vitro assessment of the plaque-removing ability of hydrodynamic shear forces produced beyond the bristles by 2 electric toothbrushes.
Hope CK; Petrie A; Wilson M
J Periodontol; 2003 Jul; 74(7):1017-22. PubMed ID: 12931764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. In vitro evaluation of the retention of three species of pathogenic microorganisms by three different types of toothbrush.
Bunetel L; Tricot-Doleux S; Agnani G; Bonnaure-Mallet M
Oral Microbiol Immunol; 2000 Oct; 15(5):313-6. PubMed ID: 11154423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Plaque-removing efficacy of new and used manual toothbrushes--a professional brushing study.
Rosema NA; Hennequin-Hoenderdos NL; Versteeg PA; van Palenstein Helderman WH; van der Velden U; van der Weijden GA
Int J Dent Hyg; 2013 Nov; 11(4):237-43. PubMed ID: 23506005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. ADRF Trebitsch Scholarship. The microbial contamination of toothbrushes. A pilot study.
Taji SS; Rogers AH
Aust Dent J; 1998 Apr; 43(2):128-30. PubMed ID: 9612987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Plaque removal characteristics of electric toothbrushes using an in vitro plaque model.
Carter K; Landini G; Walmsley AD
J Clin Periodontol; 2001 Nov; 28(11):1045-9. PubMed ID: 11686826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The relative cleaning effectiveness of manual and powered toothbrushes.
Hunt SA
J Clin Dent; 2002; 13(5):211-4. PubMed ID: 12518492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Efficacy of microwaves and chlorhexidine for disinfection of pacifiers and toothbrushes: an in vitro study.
Chamele J; Bhat C; Saraf T; Jadhav A; Beg A; Jagtap C; Ubeja R; Patil P
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Sep; 13(5):690-4. PubMed ID: 23250176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Differences in abrasion capacity of four soft toothbrushes.
Teche FV; Paranhos HF; Motta MF; Zaniquelli O; Tirapelli C
Int J Dent Hyg; 2011 Nov; 9(4):274-8. PubMed ID: 21356032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Combined effect of end-rounded versus tapered bristles and a dentifrice on plaque removal and gingival abrasion.
Caporossi LS; Dutra DA; Martins MR; Prochnow EP; Moreira CH; Kantorski KZ
Braz Oral Res; 2016; 30():. PubMed ID: 26981758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effects of sonic energy on monospecific biofilms of cariogenic microorganisms.
Brambilla E; Cagetti MG; Belluomo G; Fadini L; García-Godoy F
Am J Dent; 2006 Feb; 19(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 16555648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparative efficacy of a specially engineered sonic powered toothbrush with unique sensing and control technologies to two commercially available power toothbrushes on established plaque and gingivitis.
Ayad F; Petrone DM; Wachs GN; Mateo LR; Chaknis P; Panagakos F
J Clin Dent; 2012; 23 Spec No A():A5-10. PubMed ID: 23448082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The relative effectiveness of six powered toothbrushes for dental plaque removal.
Biesbrock AR; Walters PA; Bartizek RD
J Clin Dent; 2002; 13(5):198-202. PubMed ID: 12518489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Is a new sonic toothbrush more effective in plaque removal than a manual toothbrush?
Re D; Augusti G; Battaglia D; Giannì AB; Augusti D
Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2015 Mar; 16(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 25793947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of Bacterial Contamination and Antibacterial Efficacy in Bristles of Charcoal Toothbrushes versus Noncharcoal Toothbrushes: A Microbiological Study.
Thamke MV; Beldar A; Thakkar P; Murkute S; Ranmare V; Hudwekar A
Contemp Clin Dent; 2018; 9(3):463-467. PubMed ID: 30166845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
