These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Set-shifting and the on-line processing of relative clauses in Parkinson's disease: results from a novel eye-tracking method. Hochstadt J Cortex; 2009 Sep; 45(8):991-1011. PubMed ID: 19473654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rapid Linguistic Ambiguity Resolution in Young Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: Eye Tracking Evidence for the Limits of Weak Central Coherence. Hahn N; Snedeker J; Rabagliati H Autism Res; 2015 Dec; 8(6):717-26. PubMed ID: 25820816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The time course of anticipatory constraint integration. Kukona A; Fang SY; Aicher KA; Chen H; Magnuson JS Cognition; 2011 Apr; 119(1):23-42. PubMed ID: 21237450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Losing track of time? Processing of time reference inflection in agrammatic and healthy speakers of German. Bos LS; Hanne S; Wartenburger I; Bastiaanse R Neuropsychologia; 2014 Dec; 65():180-90. PubMed ID: 25447377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Discourse coherence modulates use of predictive processing during sentence comprehension. Carter GA; Hoffman P Cognition; 2024 Jan; 242():105637. PubMed ID: 37857052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. How statistical correlations influence discourse-level processing: Clause type as a cue for discourse relations. Marchal M; Scholman MCJ; Demberg V J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2024 May; 50(5):796-807. PubMed ID: 37561516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Phonological typicality influences on-line sentence comprehension. Farmer TA; Christiansen MH; Monaghan P Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2006 Aug; 103(32):12203-8. PubMed ID: 16882728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sentence and text comprehension: roles of linguistic structure. Clifton C; Duffy SA Annu Rev Psychol; 2001; 52():167-96. PubMed ID: 11148303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Verbal and nonverbal predictors of language-mediated anticipatory eye movements. Rommers J; Meyer AS; Huettig F Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Apr; 77(3):720-30. PubMed ID: 25795276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Electrophysiological and behavioral evidence of syntactic priming in sentence comprehension. Tooley KM; Traxler MJ; Swaab TY J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):19-45. PubMed ID: 19210079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The influence of linguistic and cognitive factors on the time course of verb-based implicit causality. Koornneef A; Dotlačil J; van den Broek P; Sanders T Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(3):455-81. PubMed ID: 26031765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Spatial distance effects on incremental semantic interpretation of abstract sentences: evidence from eye tracking. Guerra E; Knoeferle P Cognition; 2014 Dec; 133(3):535-52. PubMed ID: 25215930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The role of discourse context in the processing of a flexible word-order language. Kaiser E; Trueswell JC Cognition; 2004 Dec; 94(2):113-47. PubMed ID: 15582623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of contrastive focus on lexical predictability during sentence reading: The case of Lowder MW; Ryan G; Opie J; Kaminsky E Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Jan; 74(1):179-186. PubMed ID: 32705949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Establishing reference in language comprehension: an electrophysiological perspective. Van Berkum JJ; Koornneef AW; Otten M; Nieuwland MS Brain Res; 2007 May; 1146():158-71. PubMed ID: 16916496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Context-driven expectations about focus alternatives. Kim CS; Gunlogson C; Tanenhaus MK; Runner JT Cognition; 2015 Jun; 139():28-49. PubMed ID: 25797456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Give and take: syntactic priming during spoken language comprehension. Thothathiri M; Snedeker J Cognition; 2008 Jul; 108(1):51-68. PubMed ID: 18258226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]