793 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25247253)
1. Long-term outcomes after revision neural decompression and fusion for same-level recurrent lumbar stenosis: defining the effectiveness of surgery.
Mendenhall SK; Parker SL; Adogwa O; Shau DN; Cheng J; Aaronson O; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2014 Oct; 27(7):353-7. PubMed ID: 25247253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Revision lumbar surgery in elderly patients with symptomatic pseudarthrosis, adjacent-segment disease, or same-level recurrent stenosis. Part 1. Two-year outcomes and clinical efficacy: clinical article.
Adogwa O; Carr RK; Kudyba K; Karikari I; Bagley CA; Gokaslan ZL; Theodore N; Cheng JS
J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Feb; 18(2):139-46. PubMed ID: 23231354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after neural decompression and fusion for same-level recurrent lumbar stenosis: understanding clinical versus statistical significance.
Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau DN; Adogwa O; Anderson WN; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 May; 16(5):471-8. PubMed ID: 22324801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Preoperative Zung depression scale predicts patient satisfaction independent of the extent of improvement after revision lumbar surgery.
Adogwa O; Parker SL; Shau DN; Mendenhall SK; Bydon A; Cheng JS; Asher AL; McGirt MJ
Spine J; 2013 May; 13(5):501-6. PubMed ID: 23422730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Laminectomy and extension of instrumented fusion improves 2-year pain, disability, and quality of life in patients with adjacent segment disease: defining the long-term effectiveness of surgery.
Adogwa O; Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau DN; Aaronson O; Cheng J; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
World Neurosurg; 2013 Dec; 80(6):893-6. PubMed ID: 22381277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Preoperative Zung Depression Scale predicts outcome after revision lumbar surgery for adjacent segment disease, recurrent stenosis, and pseudarthrosis.
Adogwa O; Parker SL; Shau DN; Mendenhall SK; Aaronson OS; Cheng JS; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
Spine J; 2012 Mar; 12(3):179-85. PubMed ID: 21937282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Affective disorders influence clinical outcomes after revision lumbar surgery in elderly patients with symptomatic adjacent-segment disease, recurrent stenosis, or pseudarthrosis: clinical article.
Adogwa O; Verla T; Thompson P; Penumaka A; Kudyba K; Johnson K; Fulchiero E; Miller T; Hoang KB; Cheng J; Bagley CA
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Aug; 21(2):153-9. PubMed ID: 24836659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Revision lumbar surgery in elderly patients with symptomatic pseudarthrosis, adjacent-segment disease, or same-level recurrent stenosis. Part 2. A cost-effectiveness analysis: clinical article.
Adogwa O; Owens R; Karikari I; Agarwal V; Gottfried ON; Bagley CA; Isaacs RE; Cheng JS
J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Feb; 18(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 23231358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Determination of minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after extension of fusion for adjacent-segment disease.
Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau D; Adogwa O; Cheng JS; Anderson WN; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Jan; 16(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 21962034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost per quality-adjusted life year gained of revision neural decompression and instrumented fusion for same-level recurrent lumbar stenosis: defining the value of surgical intervention.
Adogwa O; Parker SL; Shau DN; Mendenhall SK; Aaronson O; Cheng JS; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Feb; 16(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 22054639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long-term outcomes of revision fusion for lumbar pseudarthrosis: clinical article.
Adogwa O; Parker SL; Shau D; Mendelhall SK; Cheng J; Aaronson O; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Oct; 15(4):393-8. PubMed ID: 21699473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Revision lumbar fusions have higher rates of reoperation and result in worse clinical outcomes compared to primary lumbar fusions.
Lambrechts MJ; Toci GR; Siegel N; Karamian BA; Canseco JA; Hilibrand AS; Schroeder GD; Vaccaro AR; Kepler CK
Spine J; 2023 Jan; 23(1):105-115. PubMed ID: 36064090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Psychosocial factors and surgical outcomes: are elderly depressed patients less satisfied with surgery?
Adogwa O; Carr K; Fatemi P; Verla T; Gazcon G; Gottfried O; Bagley C; Cheng J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Sep; 39(19):1614-9. PubMed ID: 24921847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prospective analysis of clinical evaluation and self-assessment by patients after decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis.
Haro H; Maekawa S; Hamada Y
Spine J; 2008; 8(2):380-4. PubMed ID: 17433781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Short- and Long-Term Outcome of Microscopic Lumbar Spine Surgery in Patients with Predominant Back or Predominant Leg Pain.
Stienen MN; Joswig H; Smoll NR; Corniola MV; Schaller K; Hildebrandt G; Gautschi OP
World Neurosurg; 2016 Sep; 93():458-465.e1. PubMed ID: 27389938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long-term durability of minimal invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiographic follow-up.
Rouben D; Casnellie M; Ferguson M
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Jul; 24(5):288-96. PubMed ID: 20975594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The outcome of decompression alone for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis.
Ahmad S; Hamad A; Bhalla A; Turner S; Balain B; Jaffray D
Eur Spine J; 2017 Feb; 26(2):414-419. PubMed ID: 27272494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Back pain improvement after decompression without fusion or stabilization in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and clinically significant preoperative back pain.
Crawford CH; Glassman SD; Mummaneni PV; Knightly JJ; Asher AL
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Nov; 25(5):596-601. PubMed ID: 27285666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Do measures of surgical effectiveness at 1 year after lumbar spine surgery accurately predict 2-year outcomes?
Adogwa O; Elsamadicy AA; Han JL; Cheng J; Karikari I; Bagley CA
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Dec; 25(6):689-696. PubMed ID: 26722957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical and radiological outcomes after decompression and posterior fusion in patients with degenerative scoliosis.
Farrokhi MR; Jamali M; Gholami M; Farrokhi F; Hosseini K
Br J Neurosurg; 2017 Oct; 31(5):514-525. PubMed ID: 28420247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
