These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25247812)

  • 1. A SUPER powerful method for genome wide association study.
    Wang Q; Tian F; Pan Y; Buckler ES; Zhang Z
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(9):e107684. PubMed ID: 25247812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. GAPIT Version 2: An Enhanced Integrated Tool for Genomic Association and Prediction.
    Tang Y; Liu X; Wang J; Li M; Wang Q; Tian F; Su Z; Pan Y; Liu D; Lipka AE; Buckler ES; Zhang Z
    Plant Genome; 2016 Jul; 9(2):. PubMed ID: 27898829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performing Genome-Wide Association Studies with Multiple Models Using GAPIT.
    Wang J; Tang Y; Zhang Z
    Methods Mol Biol; 2022; 2481():199-217. PubMed ID: 35641767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. GAPIT Version 3: Boosting Power and Accuracy for Genomic Association and Prediction.
    Wang J; Zhang Z
    Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics; 2021 Aug; 19(4):629-640. PubMed ID: 34492338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Enrichment of statistical power for genome-wide association studies.
    Li M; Liu X; Bradbury P; Yu J; Zhang YM; Todhunter RJ; Buckler ES; Zhang Z
    BMC Biol; 2014 Oct; 12():73. PubMed ID: 25322753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Simultaneous SNP selection and adjustment for population structure in high dimensional prediction models.
    Bhatnagar SR; Yang Y; Lu T; Schurr E; Loredo-Osti JC; Forest M; Oualkacha K; Greenwood CMT
    PLoS Genet; 2020 May; 16(5):e1008766. PubMed ID: 32365090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hybrid of Restricted and Penalized Maximum Likelihood Method for Efficient Genome-Wide Association Study.
    Ren W; Liang Z; He S; Xiao J
    Genes (Basel); 2020 Oct; 11(11):. PubMed ID: 33138126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genome-wide barebones regression scan for mixed-model association analysis.
    Gao J; Zhou X; Hao Z; Jiang L; Yang R
    Theor Appl Genet; 2020 Jan; 133(1):51-58. PubMed ID: 31552442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. BLINK: a package for the next level of genome-wide association studies with both individuals and markers in the millions.
    Huang M; Liu X; Zhou Y; Summers RM; Zhang Z
    Gigascience; 2019 Feb; 8(2):. PubMed ID: 30535326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Methodological implementation of mixed linear models in multi-locus genome-wide association studies.
    Wen YJ; Zhang H; Ni YL; Huang B; Zhang J; Feng JY; Wang SB; Dunwell JM; Zhang YM; Wu R
    Brief Bioinform; 2018 Jul; 19(4):700-712. PubMed ID: 28158525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A fast-linear mixed model for genome-wide haplotype association analysis: application to agronomic traits in maize.
    Chen H; Hao Z; Zhao Y; Yang R
    BMC Genomics; 2020 Feb; 21(1):151. PubMed ID: 32046650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of genome-wide imputation of untyped markers and impacts on statistical power for association studies.
    Hao K; Chudin E; McElwee J; Schadt EE
    BMC Genet; 2009 Jun; 10():27. PubMed ID: 19531258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of methods to account for relatedness in genome-wide association studies with family-based data.
    Eu-Ahsunthornwattana J; Miller EN; Fakiola M; ; Jeronimo SM; Blackwell JM; Cordell HJ
    PLoS Genet; 2014 Jul; 10(7):e1004445. PubMed ID: 25033443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. GWAS with longitudinal phenotypes: performance of approximate procedures.
    Sikorska K; Montazeri NM; Uitterlinden A; Rivadeneira F; Eilers PH; Lesaffre E
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2015 Oct; 23(10):1384-91. PubMed ID: 25712081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genome-wide algorithm for detecting CNV associations with diseases.
    Xu Y; Peng B; Fu Y; Amos CI
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2011 Aug; 12():331. PubMed ID: 21827692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Exploiting genome structure in association analysis.
    Kim S; Xing EP
    J Comput Biol; 2014 Apr; 21(4):345-60. PubMed ID: 21548809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Further improvements to linear mixed models for genome-wide association studies.
    Widmer C; Lippert C; Weissbrod O; Fusi N; Kadie C; Davidson R; Listgarten J; Heckerman D
    Sci Rep; 2014 Nov; 4():6874. PubMed ID: 25387525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. GAPIT: genome association and prediction integrated tool.
    Lipka AE; Tian F; Wang Q; Peiffer J; Li M; Bradbury PJ; Gore MA; Buckler ES; Zhang Z
    Bioinformatics; 2012 Sep; 28(18):2397-9. PubMed ID: 22796960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Fast and Powerful Empirical Bayes Method for Genome-Wide Association Studies.
    Chang T; Wei J; Liang M; An B; Wang X; Zhu B; Xu L; Zhang L; Gao X; Chen Y; Li J; Gao H
    Animals (Basel); 2019 May; 9(6):. PubMed ID: 31159215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. BLUPmrMLM: A Fast mrMLM Algorithm in Genome-wide Association Studies.
    Li HF; Wang JT; Zhao Q; Zhang YM
    Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics; 2024 Sep; 22(3):. PubMed ID: 39348630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.