These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25247817)
41. Sex differences in the effects of acute stress on behavior in the ultimatum game. Youssef FF; Bachew R; Bissessar S; Crockett MJ; Faber NS Psychoneuroendocrinology; 2018 Oct; 96():126-131. PubMed ID: 29940425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Deception and Retribution in Repeated Ultimatum Bargaining. Boles TL; Croson RT; Murnighan JK Organ Behav Hum Decis Process; 2000 Nov; 83(2):235-259. PubMed ID: 11056070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. How much is our fairness worth? The effect of raising stakes on offers by Proposers and minimum acceptable offers in Dictator and Ultimatum Games. Novakova J; Flegr J PLoS One; 2013; 8(4):e60966. PubMed ID: 23580080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Reputation in an economic game modulates premotor cortex activity during action observation. Farmer H; Apps M; Tsakiris M Eur J Neurosci; 2016 Sep; 44(5):2191-201. PubMed ID: 27364606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Distinctive roles of mPFC subregions in forming impressions and guiding social interaction based on others' social behaviour. Lim G; Kim H Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2022 Dec; 17(12):1118-1130. PubMed ID: 35579251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Relationship between platelet serotonin content and rejections of unfair offers in the ultimatum game. Emanuele E; Brondino N; Bertona M; Re S; Geroldi D Neurosci Lett; 2008 May; 437(2):158-61. PubMed ID: 18448251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. The value of a real face: Differences between affective faces and emojis in neural processing and their social influence on decision-making. Weiß M; Mussel P; Hewig J Soc Neurosci; 2020 Jun; 15(3):255-268. PubMed ID: 31581887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. You are excusable! Neural correlates of economic neediness on empathic concern and fairness perception. Wang A; Zhu L; Lyu D; Cai D; Ma Q; Jin J Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2022 Feb; 22(1):99-111. PubMed ID: 34374029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Suffering makes you egoist: acute pain increases acceptance rates and reduces fairness during a bilateral ultimatum game. Mancini A; Betti V; Panasiti MS; Pavone EF; Aglioti SM PLoS One; 2011; 6(10):e26008. PubMed ID: 22022492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Shall I Show My Emotions? The Effects of Facial Expressions in the Ultimatum Game. Ferracci S; Giuliani F; Brancucci A; Pietroni D Behav Sci (Basel); 2021 Dec; 12(1):. PubMed ID: 35049619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Lateral OFC activity predicts decision bias due to first impressions during ultimatum games. Kim H; Choi MJ; Jang IJ J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Feb; 24(2):428-39. PubMed ID: 21942764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Fairness concerns predict medial frontal negativity amplitude in ultimatum bargaining. Boksem MA; De Cremer D Soc Neurosci; 2010; 5(1):118-28. PubMed ID: 19851940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Chimpanzees engage in competitive altruism in a triadic ultimatum game. Sánchez-Amaro A; Maurits L; Haun DBM Sci Rep; 2024 Feb; 14(1):3393. PubMed ID: 38336923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Fairness norms and theory of mind in an ultimatum game: judgments, offers, and decisions in school-aged children. Castelli I; Massaro D; Bicchieri C; Chavez A; Marchetti A PLoS One; 2014; 9(8):e105024. PubMed ID: 25118863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Age-related differences in social economic decision making: the ultimatum game. Bailey PE; Ruffman T; Rendell PG J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2013 May; 68(3):356-63. PubMed ID: 22929390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Neural correlates of successful costly punishment in the Ultimatum game on a trial-by-trial basis. Mussel P; Weiß M; Rodrigues J; Heekeren H; Hewig J Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2022 Jun; 17(6):590-597. PubMed ID: 35077566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. [Reciprocity and identity protection: reasons for rejection in the ultimatum game]. Horita Y; Yamagishi T Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2007 Oct; 78(4):446-51. PubMed ID: 18027592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Dissociation between medial frontal negativity and cardiac responses in the ultimatum game: Effects of offer size and fairness. Van der Veen FM; Sahibdin PP Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2011 Dec; 11(4):516-25. PubMed ID: 21786030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Electrophysiological Correlates of Social Decision-making: An EEG Investigation of a Modified Ultimatum Game. Moore M; Katsumi Y; Dolcos S; Dolcos F J Cogn Neurosci; 2021 Dec; 34(1):54-78. PubMed ID: 34673955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Individual differences in decision making: Drive and Reward Responsiveness affect strategic bargaining in economic games. Scheres A; Sanfey AG Behav Brain Funct; 2006 Oct; 2():35. PubMed ID: 17049091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]