These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25247817)
61. Distinct neural activation patterns underlie economic decisions in high and low psychopathy scorers. Vieira JB; Almeida PR; Ferreira-Santos F; Barbosa F; Marques-Teixeira J; Marsh AA Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2014 Aug; 9(8):1099-107. PubMed ID: 23748499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Blocking incidental frustration during bargaining. Vargas MES; Brown AL; Durkee CM; Sim H Cogn Emot; 2019 Mar; 33(2):146-156. PubMed ID: 29419354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Listening to your heart and feeling yourself: effects of exposure to interoceptive signals during the ultimatum game. Lenggenhager B; Azevedo RT; Mancini A; Aglioti SM Exp Brain Res; 2013 Oct; 230(2):233-41. PubMed ID: 23873493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Equal status in Ultimatum Games promotes rational sharing. Han X; Cao S; Bao JZ; Wang WX; Zhang B; Gao ZY; Sánchez A Sci Rep; 2018 Jan; 8(1):1222. PubMed ID: 29352130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Power and fairness in a generalized ultimatum game. Ciampaglia GL; Lozano S; Helbing D PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e99039. PubMed ID: 24905349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. A neural signature of the creation of social evaluation. Osinsky R; Mussel P; Ohrlein L; Hewig J Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2014 Jun; 9(6):731-6. PubMed ID: 23547246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Resting-state network predicts the decision-making behaviors of the proposer during the ultimatum game. Li Y; Yang Q; Liu Y; Wang R; Zheng Y; Zhang Y; Si Y; Jiang L; Chen B; Peng Y; Wan F; Yu J; Yao D; Li F; He B; Xu P J Neural Eng; 2023 Sep; 20(5):. PubMed ID: 37659391 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
68. Rejection in Bargaining Situations: An Event-Related Potential Study in Adolescents and Adults. Zanolie K; de Cremer D; Güroğlu B; Crone EA PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0139953. PubMed ID: 26445134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. The role of emotion regulation and choice repetition bias in the ultimatum game. Chung JCY; Bhatoa RS; Kirkpatrick R; Woodcock KA Emotion; 2023 Jun; 23(4):925-936. PubMed ID: 36048029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Chimpanzees and bonobos use social leverage in an ultimatum game. Sánchez-Amaro A; Rossano F Proc Biol Sci; 2021 Nov; 288(1962):20211937. PubMed ID: 34727713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Higher Heart-Rate Variability Is Associated with Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex Activity and Increased Resistance to Temptation in Dietary Self-Control Challenges. Maier SU; Hare TA J Neurosci; 2017 Jan; 37(2):446-455. PubMed ID: 28077722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Effects of age-related differences in empathy on social economic decision-making. Beadle JN; Paradiso S; Kovach C; Polgreen L; Denburg NL; Tranel D Int Psychogeriatr; 2012 May; 24(5):822-33. PubMed ID: 22237008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. The private rejection of unfair offers and emotional commitment. Yamagishi T; Horita Y; Takagishi H; Shinada M; Tanida S; Cook KS Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2009 Jul; 106(28):11520-3. PubMed ID: 19564602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Strategic Motives Drive Proposers to Offer Fairly in Ultimatum Games: An fMRI Study. Chen YH; Chen YC; Kuo WJ; Kan K; Yang CC; Yen NS Sci Rep; 2017 Apr; 7(1):527. PubMed ID: 28373714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Beauty affects fairness: facial attractiveness alters neural responses to unfairness in the ultimatum game. Pan Y; Jin J; Wan Y; Wu Y; Wang F; Xu S; Zhu L; Xu J; Rao H Brain Imaging Behav; 2022 Dec; 16(6):2497-2505. PubMed ID: 35821158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. The Benefit of Gratitude: Trait Gratitude Is Associated With Effective Economic Decision-Making in the Ultimatum Game. Park G; vanOyen-Witvliet C; Barraza JA; Marsh BU Front Psychol; 2021; 12():590132. PubMed ID: 33959062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Taking it easy when playing ultimatum game with a Down syndrome proposer: Effects on behavior and medial frontal negativity. Rêgo GG; Campanhã C; do Egito JHT; Boggio PS Soc Neurosci; 2017 Oct; 12(5):530-540. PubMed ID: 27237685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Social information and economic decision-making in the ultimatum game. Gaertig C; Moser A; Alguacil S; Ruz M Front Neurosci; 2012; 6():103. PubMed ID: 22783164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Human responses to unfairness with primary rewards and their biological limits. Wright ND; Hodgson K; Fleming SM; Symmonds M; Guitart-Masip M; Dolan RJ Sci Rep; 2012; 2():593. PubMed ID: 22919460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Gut feelings and the reaction to perceived inequity: the interplay between bodily responses, regulation, and perception shapes the rejection of unfair offers on the ultimatum game. Dunn BD; Evans D; Makarova D; White J; Clark L Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2012 Sep; 12(3):419-29. PubMed ID: 22618636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]