These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25247886)

  • 1. Manipulation detection and preference alterations in a choice blindness paradigm.
    Taya F; Gupta S; Farber I; Mullette-Gillman OA
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(9):e108515. PubMed ID: 25247886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. These two are different. Yes, they're the same: Choice blindness for facial identity.
    Sauerland M; Sagana A; Siegmann K; Heiligers D; Merckelbach H; Jenkins R
    Conscious Cogn; 2016 Feb; 40():93-104. PubMed ID: 26774209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. I choose, therefore I like: preference for faces induced by arbitrary choice.
    Nakamura K; Kawabata H
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(8):e72071. PubMed ID: 23977211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Infant's visual preferences for facial traits associated with adult attractiveness judgements: data from eye-tracking.
    Griffey JA; Little AC
    Infant Behav Dev; 2014 Aug; 37(3):268-75. PubMed ID: 24793735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Facial-Attractiveness Choices Are Predicted by Divisive Normalization.
    Furl N
    Psychol Sci; 2016 Oct; 27(10):1379-1387. PubMed ID: 27565534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interactions among the effects of head orientation, emotional expression, and physical attractiveness on face preferences.
    Main JC; DeBruine LM; Little AC; Jones BC
    Perception; 2010; 39(1):62-71. PubMed ID: 20301847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Preference for attractive faces is species-specific.
    Damon F; Li Z; Yan Y; Li W; Guo K; Quinn PC; Pascalis O; Méary D
    J Comp Psychol; 2019 May; 133(2):262-271. PubMed ID: 30550303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of face skin tone on perceived facial attractiveness: A study realized with an innovative methodology.
    Vera Cruz G
    J Soc Psychol; 2018; 158(5):580-590. PubMed ID: 29257930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Similarities in human visual and declared measures of preference for opposite-sex faces.
    Griffey JA; Little AC
    Exp Psychol; 2014; 61(4):301-9. PubMed ID: 24351988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of partner beauty on opposite-sex attractiveness judgments.
    Little AC; Caldwell CA; Jones BC; DeBruine LM
    Arch Sex Behav; 2011 Dec; 40(6):1119-27. PubMed ID: 21901646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. When flexibility is stable: implicit long-term shaping of olfactory preferences.
    Coppin G; Delplanque S; Porcherot C; Cayeux I; Sander D
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(6):e37857. PubMed ID: 22761661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of the beholder's age on the perception of facial attractiveness.
    Kissler J; Bäuml KH
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2000 May; 104(2):145-66. PubMed ID: 10900703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Failure to detect mismatches between intention and outcome in a simple decision task.
    Johansson P; Hall L; Sikström S; Olsson A
    Science; 2005 Oct; 310(5745):116-9. PubMed ID: 16210542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Familiarity with Own Population's Appearance Influences Facial Preferences.
    Batres C; Kannan M; Perrett DI
    Hum Nat; 2017 Sep; 28(3):344-354. PubMed ID: 28516361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of sexual dimorphism on the attractiveness evaluation of one's own face.
    Li Z; Hu Z; Liu H
    Vision Res; 2020 Mar; 168():1-8. PubMed ID: 32044585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Are attractive facial characteristics peculiar to the sex of a face?
    Casey SJ; Mernagh M; Newell FN
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 May; 62(5):833-43. PubMed ID: 19132630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Body shape preferences: associations with rater body shape and sociosexuality.
    Price ME; Pound N; Dunn J; Hopkins S; Kang J
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(1):e52532. PubMed ID: 23300976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is the Emotional Dog Blind to Its Choices?
    Vranka MA; Bahník Š
    Exp Psychol; 2016 Jun; 63(3):180-8. PubMed ID: 27404986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The masculinity paradox: facial masculinity and beardedness interact to determine women's ratings of men's facial attractiveness.
    Dixson BJ; Sulikowski D; Gouda-Vossos A; Rantala MJ; Brooks RC
    J Evol Biol; 2016 Nov; 29(11):2311-2320. PubMed ID: 27488414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Facial aesthetics: babies prefer attractiveness to symmetry.
    Samuels CA; Butterworth G; Roberts T; Graupner L; Hole G
    Perception; 2013; 42(11):1244-52. PubMed ID: 24601036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.