These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25247959)
1. Significant dose reduction for pediatric digital subtraction angiography without impairing image quality: preclinical study in a piglet model. Racadio J; Strauss K; Abruzzo T; Patel M; Kukreja K; Johnson N; den Hartog M; Hoornaert B; Nachabe R AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Oct; 203(4):904-8. PubMed ID: 25247959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of a noise reduction imaging technology in iliac digital subtraction angiography: noninferior clinical image quality with lower patient and scatter dose. van Strijen MJ; Grünhagen T; Mauti M; Zähringer M; Gaines PA; Robinson GJ; Railton NJ; van Overhagen H; Habraken J; van Leersum M J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2015 May; 26(5):642-50.e1. PubMed ID: 25770373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of radiographic techniques (kVp and mAs) on image quality and patient doses in digital subtraction angiography. Gkanatsios NA; Huda W; Peters KR Med Phys; 2002 Aug; 29(8):1643-50. PubMed ID: 12201409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reducing radiation dose while maintaining diagnostic image quality of cerebral three-dimensional digital subtraction angiography: an in vivo study in swine. Pearl MS; Torok CM; Messina SA; Radvany M; Rao SN; Ehtiati T; Thompson CB; Gailloud P J Neurointerv Surg; 2014 Nov; 6(9):672-6. PubMed ID: 24122004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radiation doses to patients from digital subtraction angiography. Goni H; Tsalafoutas IA; Tzortzis G; Pappas P; Bouzas N; Loulakas J; Georgiou A; Georgiou E; Yakoumakis EN Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):251-5. PubMed ID: 16461514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Automated low-kilovoltage selection in pediatric computed tomography angiography: phantom study evaluating effects on radiation dose and image quality. Siegel MJ; Ramirez-Giraldo JC; Hildebolt C; Bradley D; Schmidt B Invest Radiol; 2013 Aug; 48(8):584-9. PubMed ID: 23563195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Novel X-Ray Imaging Technology Allows Substantial Patient Radiation Reduction without Image Quality Impairment in Repetitive Transarterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Wen X; Jiang X; Li R; Zhang J; Yang P; Shen B Acad Radiol; 2015 Nov; 22(11):1361-7. PubMed ID: 26472122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multidetector computed tomography chest examinations with low-kilovoltage protocols in adults: effect on image quality and radiation dose. Kim MJ; Park CH; Choi SJ; Hwang KH; Kim HS J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(3):416-21. PubMed ID: 19478637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. System for verifiable CT radiation dose optimization based on image quality. part I. Optimization model. Larson DB; Wang LL; Podberesky DJ; Goske MJ Radiology; 2013 Oct; 269(1):167-76. PubMed ID: 23784878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pediatric CT dose reduction for suspected appendicitis: a practice quality improvement project using artificial Gaussian noise--part 1, computer simulations. Callahan MJ; Kleinman PL; Strauss KJ; Bandos A; Taylor GA; Tsai A; Kleinman PK AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jan; 204(1):W86-94. PubMed ID: 25539280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Removal of Antiscatter Grids for Spinal Digital Subtraction Angiography: Dose Reduction without Loss of Diagnostic Value. Orrù E; Mekabaty AE; Millan DS; Pearl MS; Gailloud P Radiology; 2020 May; 295(2):390-396. PubMed ID: 32125257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Radiation dose and image quality of X-ray volume imaging systems: cone-beam computed tomography, digital subtraction angiography and digital fluoroscopy. Paul J; Jacobi V; Farhang M; Bazrafshan B; Vogl TJ; Mbalisike EC Eur Radiol; 2013 Jun; 23(6):1582-93. PubMed ID: 23250112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Radiation dose reduction with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) technique for chest CT in children: an intra-individual comparison. Lee SH; Kim MJ; Yoon CS; Lee MJ Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81(9):e938-43. PubMed ID: 22795526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bone marrow edema pattern identification in patients with lytic bone lesions using digital subtraction angiography-like bone subtraction on large-area detector computed tomography. Gondim Teixeira PA; Hossu G; Lecocq S; Razeto M; Louis M; Blum A Invest Radiol; 2014 Mar; 49(3):156-64. PubMed ID: 24220254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A new era in computed tomographic dose optimization: the impact of iterative reconstruction on image quality and radiation dose. Kordolaimi SD; Argentos S; Pantos I; Kelekis NL; Efstathopoulos EP J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2013; 37(6):924-31. PubMed ID: 24270114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of pediatric radiation dose and vessel visibility on angiographic systems using piglets as a surrogate: antiscatter grid removal vs. lower detector air kerma settings with a grid - a preclinical investigation. Strauss KJ; Racadio JM; Abruzzo TA; Johnson ND; Patel MN; Kukreja KU; den Hartog MJ; Hoonaert BP; Nachabe RA J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):408-417. PubMed ID: 26699297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A theoretical comparison of x-ray angiographic image quality using energy-dependent and conventional subtraction methods. Tanguay J; Kim HK; Cunningham IA Med Phys; 2012 Jan; 39(1):132-42. PubMed ID: 22225282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance of iterative reconstruction and automated tube voltage selection on the image quality and radiation dose in abdominal CT scans. Desai GS; Fuentes Orrego JM; Kambadakone AR; Sahani DV J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2013; 37(6):897-903. PubMed ID: 24270111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Characteristics of a New X-Ray Imaging System for Interventional Procedures: Improved Image Quality and Reduced Radiation Dose. Schernthaner RE; Haroun RR; Nguyen S; Duran R; Sohn JH; Sahu S; Chapiro J; Zhao Y; Radaelli A; van der Bom IM; Mauti M; Hong K; Geschwind JH; Lin M Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2018 Mar; 41(3):502-508. PubMed ID: 29090348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]