434 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25247973)
1. Introduction of an effective method for the optimization of CT protocols using iterative reconstruction algorithms: comparison with patient data.
Kordolaimi SD; Saradeas I; Ploussi A; Pantos I; Argentos S; Efstathopoulos EP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Oct; 203(4):W434-9. PubMed ID: 25247973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Initial phantom study comparing image quality in computed tomography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and new adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction v.
Lim K; Kwon H; Cho J; Oh J; Yoon S; Kang M; Ha D; Lee J; Kang E
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(3):443-8. PubMed ID: 25654782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improvements to image quality using hybrid and model-based iterative reconstructions: a phantom study.
Aurumskjöld ML; Ydström K; Tingberg A; Söderberg M
Acta Radiol; 2017 Jan; 58(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 26924832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reducing CT radiation dose with iterative reconstruction algorithms: the influence of scan and reconstruction parameters on image quality and CTDIvol.
Klink T; Obmann V; Heverhagen J; Stork A; Adam G; Begemann P
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Sep; 83(9):1645-54. PubMed ID: 25037931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparative study based on image quality and clinical task performance for CT reconstruction algorithms in radiotherapy.
Li H; Dolly S; Chen HC; Anastasio MA; Low DA; Li HH; Michalski JM; Thorstad WL; Gay H; Mutic S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):377-390. PubMed ID: 27455472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance of iterative reconstruction and automated tube voltage selection on the image quality and radiation dose in abdominal CT scans.
Desai GS; Fuentes Orrego JM; Kambadakone AR; Sahani DV
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2013; 37(6):897-903. PubMed ID: 24270111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of radiation dose and iterative reconstruction algorithms for measurement accuracy and reproducibility of pulmonary nodule volumetry: A phantom study.
Kim H; Park CM; Song YS; Lee SM; Goo JM
Eur J Radiol; 2014 May; 83(5):848-57. PubMed ID: 24572380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Submillisievert chest CT with filtered back projection and iterative reconstruction techniques.
Padole A; Singh S; Ackman JB; Wu C; Do S; Pourjabbar S; Khawaja RD; Otrakji A; Digumarthy S; Shepard JA; Kalra M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Oct; 203(4):772-81. PubMed ID: 25247943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Combining low tube voltage and iterative reconstruction for contrast-enhanced CT imaging of the chest-initial clinical experience.
Li Q; Yu H; Zhang L; Fan L; Liu SY
Clin Radiol; 2013 May; 68(5):e249-53. PubMed ID: 23428340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reduction in radiation and contrast medium dose via optimization of low-kilovoltage CT protocols using a hybrid iterative reconstruction algorithm at 256-slice body CT: phantom study and clinical correlation.
Itatani R; Oda S; Utsunomiya D; Funama Y; Honda K; Katahira K; Morishita S; Yamamura S; Namimoto T; Yamashita Y
Clin Radiol; 2013 Mar; 68(3):e128-35. PubMed ID: 23245269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Knowledge-based iterative model reconstruction: comparative image quality and radiation dose with a pediatric computed tomography phantom.
Ryu YJ; Choi YH; Cheon JE; Ha S; Kim WS; Kim IO
Pediatr Radiol; 2016 Mar; 46(3):303-15. PubMed ID: 26546568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Iterative reconstruction algorithm for abdominal multidetector CT at different tube voltages: assessment of diagnostic accuracy, image quality, and radiation dose in a phantom study.
Schindera ST; Diedrichsen L; Müller HC; Rusch O; Marin D; Schmidt B; Raupach R; Vock P; Szucs-Farkas Z
Radiology; 2011 Aug; 260(2):454-62. PubMed ID: 21493795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Coronary CT angiography: comparison of a novel iterative reconstruction with filtered back projection for reconstruction of low-dose CT-Initial experience.
Takx RA; Schoepf UJ; Moscariello A; Das M; Rowe G; Schoenberg SO; Fink C; Henzler T
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Feb; 82(2):275-80. PubMed ID: 23177187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sinogram affirmed iterative reconstruction in head CT: improvement of objective and subjective image quality with concomitant radiation dose reduction.
Korn A; Bender B; Fenchel M; Spira D; Schabel C; Thomas C; Flohr T; Claussen CD; Bhadelia R; Ernemann U; Brodoefel H
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Sep; 82(9):1431-5. PubMed ID: 23587902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Systematic error in lung nodule volumetry: effect of iterative reconstruction versus filtered back projection at different CT parameters.
Willemink MJ; Leiner T; Budde RP; de Kort FP; Vliegenthart R; van Ooijen PM; Oudkerk M; de Jong PA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Dec; 199(6):1241-6. PubMed ID: 23169714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Successful Dose Reduction Using Reduced Tube Voltage With Hybrid Iterative Reconstruction in Pediatric Abdominal CT.
Berlin SC; Weinert DM; Vasavada PS; Martinez-Rios C; Parikh RA; Wien MA; Jordan DW; Novak RD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Aug; 205(2):392-9. PubMed ID: 26204293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Filtered back projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and a model-based iterative reconstruction in abdominal CT: an experimental clinical study.
Deák Z; Grimm JM; Treitl M; Geyer LL; Linsenmaier U; Körner M; Reiser MF; Wirth S
Radiology; 2013 Jan; 266(1):197-206. PubMed ID: 23169793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Determination of optimal imaging settings for urolithiasis CT using filtered back projection (FBP), statistical iterative reconstruction (IR) and knowledge-based iterative model reconstruction (IMR): a physical human phantom study.
Choi SY; Ahn SH; Choi JD; Kim JH; Lee BI; Kim JI; Park SB
Br J Radiol; 2016; 89(1058):20150527. PubMed ID: 26577542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hybrid iterative reconstruction technique for abdominal CT protocols in obese patients: assessment of image quality, radiation dose, and low-contrast detectability in a phantom.
Schindera ST; Odedra D; Mercer D; Thipphavong S; Chou P; Szucs-Farkas Z; Rogalla P
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Feb; 202(2):W146-52. PubMed ID: 24450696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. System for verifiable CT radiation dose optimization based on image quality. part I. Optimization model.
Larson DB; Wang LL; Podberesky DJ; Goske MJ
Radiology; 2013 Oct; 269(1):167-76. PubMed ID: 23784878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
