375 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25248524)
1. Severe obesity effect on low back biomechanical stress of manual load lifting.
Singh D; Park W; Hwang D; Levy MS
Work; 2015 Jun; 51(2):337-48. PubMed ID: 25248524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Low-back loading in lifting two loads beside the body compared to lifting one load in front of the body.
Faber GS; Kingma I; Bakker AJ; van Dieën JH
J Biomech; 2009 Jan; 42(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 19084840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical Assessment of the NIOSH Lifting Equation in Asymmetric Load-Handling Activities Using a Detailed Musculoskeletal Model.
Behjati M; Arjmand N
Hum Factors; 2019 Mar; 61(2):191-202. PubMed ID: 30222936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dynamically and statically determined low back moments during lifting.
McGill SM; Norman RW
J Biomech; 1985; 18(12):877-85. PubMed ID: 4077856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical analysis of manual material handling movement in healthy weight and obese workers.
Corbeil P; Plamondon A; Handrigan G; Vallée-Marcotte J; Laurendeau S; Ten Have J; Manzerolle N
Appl Ergon; 2019 Jan; 74():124-133. PubMed ID: 30487091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predictive equations for lumbar spine loads in load-dependent asymmetric one- and two-handed lifting activities.
Arjmand N; Plamondon A; Shirazi-Adl A; Parnianpour M; Larivière C
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Jul; 27(6):537-44. PubMed ID: 22265249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Underestimation of object mass in lifting does not increase the load on the low back.
van der Burg JC; van Dieën JH
J Biomech; 2001 Nov; 34(11):1447-53. PubMed ID: 11672719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of mental processing on low back load while lifting an object.
Katsuhira J; Matsudaira K; Iwakiri K; Kimura Y; Ohashi T; Ono R; Sugita S; Fukuda K; Abe S; Maruyama H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jun; 38(13):E832-9. PubMed ID: 23722573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Age related differences in mechanical demands imposed on the lower back by manual material handling tasks.
Shojaei I; Vazirian M; Croft E; Nussbaum MA; Bazrgari B
J Biomech; 2016 Apr; 49(6):896-903. PubMed ID: 26556714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A dynamic 3D biomechanical evaluation of the load on the low back during different patient-handling tasks.
Skotte JH; Essendrop M; Hansen AF; Schibye B
J Biomech; 2002 Oct; 35(10):1357-66. PubMed ID: 12231281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Postural effects on biomechanical and psychophysical weight-lifting limits.
Chaffin DB; Page GB
Ergonomics; 1994 Apr; 37(4):663-76. PubMed ID: 8187750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A biomechanical analysis of methods used for transferring totally dependent patients.
Ulin SS; Chaffin DB; Patellos CL; Blitz SG; Emerick CA; Lundy F; Misher L
SCI Nurs; 1997 Mar; 14(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 9165952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluating lifting tasks using subjective and biomechanical estimates of stress at the lower back.
Waikar A; Lee K; Aghazadeh F; Parks C
Ergonomics; 1991 Jan; 34(1):33-47. PubMed ID: 2009848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical response of a lumbar intervertebral disc to manual lifting activities: a poroelastic finite element model study.
Natarajan RN; Lavender SA; An HA; Andersson GB
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Aug; 33(18):1958-65. PubMed ID: 18708928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lift performance and lumbar loading in standing and seated lifts.
Middleton KJ; Carstairs GL; Ham DJ
Ergonomics; 2016 Sep; 59(9):1242-50. PubMed ID: 26772388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relative performances of artificial neural network and regression mapping tools in evaluation of spinal loads and muscle forces during static lifting.
Arjmand N; Ekrami O; Shirazi-Adl A; Plamondon A; Parnianpour M
J Biomech; 2013 May; 46(8):1454-62. PubMed ID: 23541615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) Recommended Weight Generates Different Spine Loads in Load-Handling Activity Performed Using Stoop, Semi-squat and Full-Squat Techniques; a Full-Body Musculoskeletal Model Study.
Dehghan P; Arjmand N
Hum Factors; 2024 May; 66(5):1387-1398. PubMed ID: 36433743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The load on the lumbar spine during asymmetrical bi-manual materials handling.
Jäger M; Luttmann A
Ergonomics; 1992; 35(7-8):783-805. PubMed ID: 1633789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Low-back stresses when learning to use a materials handling device.
Chaffin DB; Stump BS; Nussbaum MA; Baker G
Ergonomics; 1999 Jan; 42(1):94-110. PubMed ID: 9973874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The assessment of material handling strategies in dealing with sudden loading: the effects of load handling position on trunk biomechanics.
Ning X; Zhou J; Dai B; Jaridi M
Appl Ergon; 2014 Nov; 45(6):1399-405. PubMed ID: 24766903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
